Everyone knows that the first "spy" is no longer credible since he LIED on the face of the complaint, that there are untruths in the complaint and he must have had help crating the complaint.
So HEY look here we got another one!
So why didn’t this “eye witness” file the initial complaint?
Next.
Everyone knows that the first "spy" is no longer credible since he LIED on the face of the complaint, that there are untruths in the complaint and he must have had help crating the complaint.
So HEY look here we got another one!
So why didn’t this “eye witness” file the initial complaint?
Next.
Indeed!
From CNN:
The lawyer for the first intelligence whistleblower who came forward with accusations concerning President Donald Trump and his interactions with Ukraine said Sunday he is representing a second whistleblower regarding the President's actions.
Attorney Mark Zaid confirmed to CNN that he and other lawyers on his team are now representing the second person. Zaid told CNN that the second whistleblower is from the intelligence community and has spoken to the intelligence community's inspector general, but has not filed their own complaint and doesn't need to as anyone who speaks to inspector watchdog is considered to have made a protected disclosure and is a whistleblower under law.
Attorney Andrew Bakaj, also representing the whistleblowers, tweeted Sunday, "I can confirm that my firm and my team represent multiple whistleblowers in connection to the underlying August 12, 2019, disclosure to the Intelligence Community Inspector General. No further comment at this time."
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/06/politics/second-whistleblower-trump-ukraine/index.html
Time to flush the orange turd!
We will be seeing more and more coming forward.
Deep State Part Two - So Orchestrated it is past contrived.
Trump impeachment: Second whistleblower emerges
![]()
A second whistleblower has come forward in the impeachment case against US President Donald Trump, according to lawyers representing the first one.
Mark Zaid told ABC News the second person was also an intelligence official and they had spoken to the inspector general.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-49953225
Having first-hand knowledge of a call that was completely legal, makes no difference. The second-hand knowledge whistleblower was not going to be able to make the case against Trump, so Schiff and company scrambled to find somebody with ‘first-hand’ knowledge. Unless any one of them can prove wrongdoing with the call, they’ll both blow Schiff’s chances for a coup against Trump.
Second-hand/first-hand: unless they can fabricate and prove something different from what’s in the call transcript, it’s game over !
It was the world's most perfect phone call.
From CNN:
The lawyer for the first intelligence whistleblower who came forward with accusations concerning President Donald Trump and his interactions with Ukraine said Sunday he is representing a second whistleblower regarding the President's actions.
Attorney Mark Zaid confirmed to CNN that he and other lawyers on his team are now representing the second person. Zaid told CNN that the second whistleblower is from the intelligence community and has spoken to the intelligence community's inspector general, but has not filed their own complaint and doesn't need to as anyone who speaks to inspector watchdog is considered to have made a protected disclosure and is a whistleblower under law.
Attorney Andrew Bakaj, also representing the whistleblowers, tweeted Sunday, "I can confirm that my firm and my team represent multiple whistleblowers in connection to the underlying August 12, 2019, disclosure to the Intelligence Community Inspector General. No further comment at this time."
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/06/politics/second-whistleblower-trump-ukraine/index.html
Time to flush the orange turd!