Some of my less learned posters need a primer on impeachable offences.

Micawber said:
Anyone who is OK with any President making calls asking a foreign country to start an investigate his political rival
is morally bankrupt. Trump did that. He used coercion to do it that risked lives. His administration tried to hide it
by misusing secret computer servers. None of the foregoing is a topic of reasonable dispute. It you are OK with that
for any reason, you are a scumbag traitor to the United States. Own your treason scumlicking dogs.
Click to expand...

That would be Bama. His FBI, CIA, Clinton and DNC sought foreign assistance for Clinton's effort in 2016.
 
Gonzomin said:
You smell something you are unfamiliar with, the truth.No desperation. This is going along steadily and carefully. It is rightys that see the hole Trump dug and are scared of.
Click to expand...

No. I smell the stench of desperation from the left. It smells like fear. No mistaking it.
 
Cinnabar said:
There are some very filthy low-lives on the right that are driving the conversation within the echo chamber. Listen to what one of the biggest POS in the party admitted to after Nancy Pelosi acquiesced to taking a vote...



This scumbag cares nothing about the rule of law or the oath he took to uphold it.
Click to expand...

"acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence"
There were 10 "opportunities" which were never brought to fruition.

Teacher: Little Johnny began a good science fair entry and was capable of getting an 'A'.
Mom: Well, why didn't he then?
Teacher: He didn't follow through and finish his project.
 
Lock him up...


It appears the "transcript" of the call was redacted to remove the worst of it before being released, reminds me of Nixon's 6 minute gap. They should subpoena the actual transcript.
 
Jarod said:
Lock him up...


It appears the "transcript" of the call was redacted to remove the worst of it before being released, reminds me of Nixon's 6 minute gap. They should subpoena the actual transcript.
Click to expand...

I am shocked you are not offering your legal skills to the Democrats pro-bono. You know, to fight the cause. LMAO!
 
Jarod said:
Lock him up...


It appears the "transcript" of the call was redacted to remove the worst of it before being released, reminds me of Nixon's 6 minute gap. They should subpoena the actual transcript.
Click to expand...

Um hmmm. Vandlin never filed a complaint back in July. Get over it.
He passed his info from what he heard on the call to whoever the wb is
and now we have the transcript.
He never even protested against any "inaccuracies" when the transcript was released.
It screwed up all the Dems plans when Trump surprised everyone by making it public
practically overnight. Transparency! :awesome:
 
Jarod said:
In Federalist 65, one of the principal architects of the Constitution Alexander Hamilton wrote that impeachable offenses are those that arise from the "misconduct of public men, or in other words from the abuse or violation of some public trust."He explains that "high crimes and misdemeanors" is a common law term used to describe offences that are "political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself.

As you may or not have learned in your provencal schools, the executive is not the only constitutional officer who can be impeached. Judicial officers have more often been the subject of impeachment, using the same standard laid out by the Constitution, and in those cases less than a third have been impeached due to statutorily criminal offences. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44260.pdf (page 9) Interestingly, Federal Judge John Pickering was impeached and convicted for, among other things,
appearing on the bench “in a state of total intoxication.” ibid. This was not a crime.

President Johnson was specifically impeached for violating the Tenure of Office Act, which was not a criminal statute and violation of it was not a criminal act. HE was also impeached for criticizing Congress and questioning its legislative authority. These are not criminal acts.

As you can see, historical precedent illustrates, that while it appears that President Trump has committed several criminal acts, impeachment does not require such.


So PLEASE stop spewing your uneducated crap. Thank you!
Click to expand...

Poor little Garud, so desperate to come up with something so he can once again shout "THIS IS IT".

You are an idiot, stop trying to pretend you have a clue what you are talking about.
 
Superfreak said:
Poor little Garud, so desperate to come up with something so he can once again shout "THIS IS IT".

You are an idiot, stop trying to pretend you have a clue what you are talking about.
Click to expand...

You are an ignorant fool, but you would have to give up your insistence on being all knowing in order to learn anything.
 
Jarod said:
The rabble do not understand impeachment and should simply leave it to the more educated.
Click to expand...

Comical coming from a buffoon like Garud. You should take the advice above moron. You have proven time and again you don't know what you are talking about.
 
Cypress said:
Trump was not the choice of the American people.
Hillary Clinton was the choice of the American people.
Hillary Clinton was preferred by the American people by millions more votes than for Trump.

In 2018, the American people also offered a referendum on what they thought of Trump's performance by handing Democrats a historic mid term blue wave victory, with Trump personally being responsible for the GOP losing the House of Reps.
Click to expand...

Here comes the deranged degenerate Cypress again... once again proving what an idiot he is. He is too ignorant to comprehend how our President is elected. Too stupid to understand how the electoral college works.

Trump was the choice of the people. He dominated the electoral college vote. But poor idiots like Cypress still cling to the belief that California should decide the election because they voted overwhelmingly for the idiot that lost to Trump.
 
Jarod said:
The will of the people is the majority, Trump one based on the electoral college which does not represent the will of the people.
Click to expand...

wrong again idiot. You should leave the discussion to those who actually understand our system of government and how the President is elected. Except Maine and Nebraska, every state is a popular vote. The WILL of the people of that state. Winner take all for the electoral votes of that state.
 
Superfreak said:
Here comes the deranged degenerate Cypress again... once again proving what an idiot he is. He is too ignorant to comprehend how our President is elected. Too stupid to understand how the electoral college works.

Trump was the choice of the people. He dominated the electoral college vote. But poor idiots like Cypress still cling to the belief that California should decide the election because they voted overwhelmingly for the idiot that lost to Trump.
Click to expand...

It is concerning how many liberals on this board think popular vote means something. The electoral college is genius. Not to mention the obvious fact it may someday work in Democrats favor. Obviously they are not generally bright enough to see that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top