What if there was an Impeachment and nobody cared?
- Thread starter anatta
- Start date
So you think a president should demand that nobody in the administration and anyone else who worked with him testify to congress, they should ignore subpoenas and court orders. That is a horrible abuse of power. Bill Clinton testified under oath. Nixon provided all the paperwork that was demanded. Trump refused to honor the norms and standards that presidents used to follow. That is the actions of a guilty man. That was a terrible abuse of power.
FastLane
Verified User
You need to prepare yourself for 4 more years of Trump . You don't seam to be functioning in reality. I don't want 2020 to be a shock on your psyche like 2016 apparently was. In short...seek help!
ROFL..sure the Dems picked the Articles without one crime listed...for what was it?? benefit of Republicans??
FastLane
Verified User
And Nixon and Clinton had much more due process than The Three Stooges Nancy, Schiff and Nadler gave Trump. Trump would have to be crazy to play with a stacked deck against him. If the process had been fair Trump would have cooperated.
FastLane
Verified User
Quid pro quo err bribery err never mind. They lied lied lied then they just forgot about it.ROFL..sure the Dems picked the Articles without one crime listed...for what was it?? benefit of Republicans??
No, he hasn't. Not a crime.
High crimes and misdemeanors
^Idiot doesn’t know shit about the Constitution or impeachment.
Just another dime-a-dozen RW tard.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-do-scholars-say-about-impeachment-power
https://www.heritage.org/political-process/commentary/how-the-impeachment-process-works
One doesn't ask a mentally retarded dumbass like DUMBER IQ of 76 anything; one points at a mentally retarded dumbass like DUMBER IQ of 76 and laughs.
High crimes and misdemeanors
^Idiot doesn’t know shit about the Constitution or impeachment.
Just another dime-a-dozen RW tard.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-do-scholars-say-about-impeachment-power
https://www.heritage.org/political-process/commentary/how-the-impeachment-process-works
Hurting Democrats feelings does not constitute High crimes and misdemeanors, you insufferable dumbass.
Hurting Democrats feelings does not constitute High crimes and misdemeanors, you insufferable dumbass.
^Still ignorant of the meaning, even though references have been provided.
Willfully ignorant, illiterate fucktard.
The OP is on point.
The "plaintiff's" in this case against Trump were totally overwhelming.
I am a litigation attorney. This was not even a contest. Trump team simply rolled over and basically didn't care.
In the whole of it, they had one witness, the Turley lying sellout whore versus 3 other experts, and then there were 8-12 other
fact witnesses, and NO defense at all. I understand they will have NO witnesses in the Senate either.
Basically they have decided, Yes he is a crook, but he is our crook, and the system doesn't work, but it is broken in our favor this time so fuck it.
But as a case? LMAO. Trump was totally dominated and the "defense" such as it was, was clownish, antics based, non substantive
and simply gainsaid the obvious import of every fact. An honest jury would deliberate 5 minutes before convicting Trump. Not even close.
The "plaintiff's" in this case against Trump were totally overwhelming.
I am a litigation attorney. This was not even a contest. Trump team simply rolled over and basically didn't care.
In the whole of it, they had one witness, the Turley lying sellout whore versus 3 other experts, and then there were 8-12 other
fact witnesses, and NO defense at all. I understand they will have NO witnesses in the Senate either.
Basically they have decided, Yes he is a crook, but he is our crook, and the system doesn't work, but it is broken in our favor this time so fuck it.
But as a case? LMAO. Trump was totally dominated and the "defense" such as it was, was clownish, antics based, non substantive
and simply gainsaid the obvious import of every fact. An honest jury would deliberate 5 minutes before convicting Trump. Not even close.
Yes, you are.
High crimes and misdemeanors
^Idiot doesn’t know shit about the Constitution or impeachment.
Just another dime-a-dozen RW tard.
Willful ignorance is your strong suit, cunt.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-do-scholars-say-about-impeachment-power
FastLane
Verified User
You need to prepare yourself for 4 more years of Trump . You don't seam to be functioning in reality. I don't want 2020 to be a shock on your psyche like 2016 apparently was. In short...seek help!
FastLane
Verified User
Its all about the swing states. 
Across 6 Battleground States Voters Oppose Impeaching & Removing Trump 52-44%
https://scri.siena.edu/2019/10/30/a...oters-oppose-impeaching-removing-trump-52-44/
Across 6 Battleground States Voters Oppose Impeaching & Removing Trump 52-44%
https://scri.siena.edu/2019/10/30/a...oters-oppose-impeaching-removing-trump-52-44/
FastLane
Verified User
You guys don't get it. States like NY and Ca swell the polls for impeachment but they won't go for Trump in 2020 anyway. Its all about the swing states. And the swing states aren't going for impeachment. The swing states are what gave trump the victory in 2016 and they will play a critical role in 2020.
FastLane
Verified User
Hurting Democrats feelings does not constitute High crimes and misdemeanors, you insufferable dumbass.
Y’all should sometimes look at the comments on decidedly left wing Yahoo! News articles which are overwhelmingly anti-Trump. The comments are at least 90% in favor of Trump or anti-Schiff/Pelosi/democrats in general.
floridafan
Verified User
Prove to us that swing states aren't going for impeachment!! You have no idea what you are talking about.