Abortion Question.

Eagle_Eye

Eagle_Eye

Well-known member
Row V Wade has been the law for nearly 50 years. Medical science has made tremendous advances in medicine in that time.

Abortion becomes a moral and legal issue when a fetus reaches a certain stage, per the laws enacted by politicians.

Instead of politicians deciding when a woman can or cannot have an abortion, how about letting the medical community decide at which point an abortion is manslaughter? Take the politics out of the formula. Let the decision be between a woman and her doctor based on AMA rulings.
 
Eagle_Eye said:
Row V Wade has been the law for nearly 50 years. Medical science has made tremendous advances in medicine. Abortion becomes a moral and legal issue when a fetus reaches a certain stage, per the laws enacted by politicians. Instead of politicians deciding when a woman can or cannot have an abortion, how about letting the medical community decide at which point an abortion is manslaughter? Take the politics out of the formula. Let the decision be between a woman and her doctor based on AMA rulings.
Click to expand...

Doctors don’t make law. Legislators do.
 
Eagle_Eye said:
Row V Wade has been the law for nearly 50 years. Medical science has made tremendous advances in medicine in that time.

Abortion becomes a moral and legal issue when a fetus reaches a certain stage, per the laws enacted by politicians.

Instead of politicians deciding when a woman can or cannot have an abortion, how about letting the medical community decide at which point an abortion is manslaughter? Take the politics out of the formula. Let the decision be between a woman and her doctor based on AMA rulings.
Click to expand...

Or you right wing nuts stop telling women what do with their own lives and bodies.
 
Eagle_Eye said:
Row V Wade has been the law for nearly 50 years.
Click to expand...

No, it hasn't. A Supreme Court ruling is not legislation. A minor point, you may think, but a critical one.

Roe vs Wade is a court decision that is cited as an example or analogy to resolve similar questions of law in later cases. It is not law.
 
Eagle_Eye said:
When people use that worn out phrase I often wonder why they didn't tell their mother she should have aborted them. After all it's her body!
Click to expand...

Have you noticed that they never apply "My body, my choice" to vaccine mandates?
 
Viability can be as early as 20 weeks as per medical science.

As I have stated multiple times, it changes nothing since most abortions are done within 10 weeks anyway.
 
Why are we talking about vaccine? Take it elsewhere, dumbass. Take your whataboutism and shove it up your ass.
 
Eagle_Eye said:
Row V Wade has been the law for nearly 50 years. Medical science has made tremendous advances in medicine in that time.

Abortion becomes a moral and legal issue when a fetus reaches a certain stage, per the laws enacted by politicians.

Instead of politicians deciding when a woman can or cannot have an abortion, how about letting the medical community decide at which point an abortion is manslaughter? Take the politics out of the formula. Let the decision be between a woman and her doctor based on AMA rulings.
Click to expand...

Ra-men, Brother Eagle, ra-men.
 
Legion said:
OK. Stop telling unvaccinated Americans what do with their own lives and bodies.

Deal?
Click to expand...

Deal. Instead, we'll just tell you lepers to stay home. You know, like you covidiots all said to us norms last year when governments mandated masks and social distancing to keep you fools alive.
 
AProudLefty said:
Viability can be as early as 20 weeks as per medical science.

As I have stated multiple times, it changes nothing since most abortions are done within 10 weeks anyway.
Click to expand...

Rarely some premie fetuses have survived that early, at great emotional and financial cost, and with intense medical supportive care. Even so, when a woman miscarries at that stage of gestation, we don't call it a "stillbirth." It's a "miscarriage" or "missed abortion."

The decision properly belongs between a woman and her physician. Males and child-less women have no right to input.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Ra-men, Brother Eagle, ra-men.
Click to expand...
What amazes me is people go bat shit crazy over abortion. As you know I'm against abortion being used as as a birth control measure. But I do understand a fetus does not become a person until a certain point in gestation. Who better to decide when a fetus becomes a person than a doctor?
 
A quarter of women in America have had abortions. The rightys religious beliefs are not building a consensus How many voters can you drive away?. Over 60 percent of Americans want Roe v Wade to stay in place.
 
Eagle_Eye said:
Who better to decide when a fetus becomes a person than a doctor?
Click to expand...

I am, IMO. If the mother-to-be is a DEMOCRAT, I believe I should have the right, nay, the obligation to terminate the pregnancy and the host organism with extreme prejudice. :D
 
Abortion should be mandatory for all unintended pregnancies.
Pregnancies should require, on an individual basis, licensing by a government board of family planning experts.

If a mother insists on carrying an accidental baby full term,
the baby should be confiscated by social services and both biological parents should be heavily fined if not incarcerated.

Who could argue with logical reasoning like that? Certainly nobody who isn't intellectually and morally deficient, right?
 
Eagle_Eye said:
Row V Wade has been the law for nearly 50 years. Medical science has made tremendous advances in medicine in that time.

Abortion becomes a moral and legal issue when a fetus reaches a certain stage, per the laws enacted by politicians.

Instead of politicians deciding when a woman can or cannot have an abortion, how about letting the medical community decide at which point an abortion is manslaughter? Take the politics out of the formula. Let the decision be between a woman and her doctor based on AMA rulings.
Click to expand...

Better yet. SCOTUS reverses and sends it back to the states. Jackasses keep wailing about the death of democracy, that vote in each state would be the very definition of democracy! And it would be like gambling. People would take abortion vacations to blue shitholes and spend their money(which would be taxed out the wazoo, of course)! Maybe, all the jackasses would move BACK those blue shitholes instead of moving to red states and trying to turn them blue.

One of the drawbacks though would be that unwanted 18-year-olds would be running for their lives. That's what I would call a truly "liberal" policy!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top