Abortion Question.

In about six months, the Grand Architect of the Universe will look down and be pleased that the policy, supported by the ilk of Jarod, to allow the murder of their own unborn children, will go away.

The Cartels will be upset with you skimming their fentanyl, amigo.

Americans will lose respect for SCOTUS; another American institution destroyed by the New Republican Party.
 
It seems like it's a woman's personal decision.

Your 'within the Law' bullshit is meaningless.
What if Abortions are banned. And women that have abortions go to jail for 20 years for Murder.
(yes, we all know Bounty Hunter EE would be hot on the trail of 'Violators')

Utter and total BS.
Why the States Did Not Prosecute Women for Abortion Before Roe v. Wade The political claim—that women were or will be prosecuted or jailed under abortion laws—has been made so frequently by Planned Parenthood, NARAL, and NOW over the past 40 years that it has become an urban legend. It shows the astonishing power of contemporary media to make a complete falsehood into a truism.

For 30 years, abortion advocates have claimed—without any evidence and contrary to the well-documented practice of ALL 50 states—that women were jailed before Roe and would be jailed if Roe falls (or if state abortion prohibitions are reinstated).

This claim rests on not one but two falsehoods:

First, the almost uniform state policy before Roe was that abortion laws targeted abortionists, not women. Abortion laws targeted those who performed abortion, not women. In fact, the states expressly treated women as the second “victim” of abortion; state courts expressly called the woman a second “victim.” Abortionists were the exclusive target of the law.

Second, the myth that women will be jailed relies, however, on the myth that “overturning” Roe will result in the immediate re-criminalization of abortion. If Roe was overturned today, abortion would be legal in at least 42-43 states tomorrow, and likely all 50 states, for the simple reason that nearly all of the state abortion prohibitions have been either repealed or are blocked by state versions of Roe adopted by state courts.
https://aul.org/2010/04/23/why-the-states-did-not-prosecute-women-for-abortion-before-roe-v-wade/

Tell me Dr. Mengele who is more qualified to decide the question of abortion, doctors or politicians?

Keep up the hysteria. Abortion laws will change hopefully for the better.

BTW
If it's the woman's body and she has total control that must mean she owns the fetus and has total control over whether it lives or dies. Then logically doesn't she own the human she produced and has the right to decide it's fate for as long as it lives?
 
“If it's the woman's body and she has total control that must mean she owns the fetus and has total control over whether it lives or dies. Then logically doesn't she own the human she produced and has the right to decide it's fate for as long as it lives?”

I have seen this question often. I have yet to see a lefty answer it with even a modicum of truth.
 
Mothers who murder their own unborn children will not be looked upon favorably by the Grand Architect.
 
Or you right wing nuts stop telling women what do with their own lives and bodies.

Or men, and women, start taking better precautions, and showing self control, so murdering babies aren't needed! Rape, and incest, lead to the death penalty! Period! Also equal protection under the law for men!
 
Utter and total BS.
https://aul.org/2010/04/23/why-the-states-did-not-prosecute-women-for-abortion-before-roe-v-wade/

Tell me Dr. Mengele who is more qualified to decide the question of abortion, doctors or politicians?

Keep up the hysteria. Abortion laws will change hopefully for the better.

BTW
If it's the woman's body and she has total control that must mean she owns the fetus and has total control over whether it lives or dies. Then logically doesn't she own the human she produced and has the right to decide it's fate for as long as it lives?



EE. Admit you are a Fascist. Admit you want to Dominate women.

EE: "Abortion laws will change hopefully for the better."
Jack: What's wrong with letting women decide ?

EE: "If it's the woman's body and she has total control that must mean she owns the fetus and has total control over whether it lives or dies. Then logically doesn't she own the human she produced and has the right to decide it's fate for as long as it lives?"
Jack: (shaking head) You've really gone off the Deep End this time, Eagle Eye)





:smh:
 
Mothers who murder their own unborn children will not be looked upon favorably by the Grand Architect.

The Grand Architect was the one who killed mothers and children in the flood. He also was the one who commanded his people to kill women and children.

With that kind of track record, I wouldn't rely on him for morals if I were you.
 
What amazes me is people go bat shit crazy over abortion. As you know I'm against abortion being used as as a birth control measure. But I do understand a fetus does not become a person until a certain point in gestation. Who better to decide when a fetus becomes a person than a doctor?

Wrong at conception! As soon as that child comes out as anything but human, we will talk!
 
What amazes me is people go bat shit crazy over abortion. As you know I'm against abortion being used as as a birth control measure. But I do understand a fetus does not become a person until a certain point in gestation. Who better to decide when a fetus becomes a person than a doctor?

GOD! Birth control is all it is used for !
 
Cool. Why is the Supreme Court involved?

They should have never been involved! The Constitution does not confer upon the federal government a specifically enumerated power to grant or deny "personhood" under the Fourteenth Amendment.
 
Exactly. Both parties want to win votes. Where have you been?

DUH!

The only people who have been making it divisive are the pro-lifers, especially the fundies.

That is an outright lie and damned lame. The only reason this case reached the Supreme Courts was because of the lefts desire to murder the unborn on demand. :palm:

Appealing to the past is a fallacy.

It's not an "appeal" to anything. It is historical fact. History is important to know and to learn so that one does not keep repeating the same mistakes. :palm:
 
Perhaps DEMOCRATS still don't consider Black or brown people to be human.

abortion-pie-chart-2.4.png


CMgfMcvUwAA5Atg.jpg

The Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses continues to cling to its racist past. :thumbsup:
 
Back
Top