federal gun control is unconstitutional and unlawful

That isn't true, at all. Very few rights are unlimited.

It's really like saying slander is protected under the Constitution, because it's speech.
 
Thing1 said:
That isn't true, at all. Very few rights are unlimited.

It's really like saying slander is protected under the Constitution, because it's speech.
Click to expand...

there is no right to commit a crime, so what you're trying to show as no rights are absolute, is bunk. all rights are absolute. committing crimes is not a right.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
there is no right to commit a crime, so what you're trying to show as no rights are absolute, is bunk. all rights are absolute. committing crimes is not a right.
Click to expand...

2A is repealed, owning a gun is now a crime. There, problem solved. You can still defend yourself, you just can't use a gun to do it. Fix your arguments.
 
Last edited:
SmarterthanYou said:
when owning a gun becomes a crime, I will not only be a criminal, but I will also be a freedom fighter restoring the constitution from those who have usurped it.
Click to expand...

But such a change would require an outstanding mandate from "we the people" as you'd call them.
 
If all federal gun control is unconstitutional, how do you feel about the current restrictions put on fully automatic weapons?
 
Mr.Badguy said:
If all federal gun control is unconstitutional, how do you feel about the current restrictions put on fully automatic weapons?
Click to expand...

they're bogus and should be ignored. the problem lies with a majority who don't understand the constitution or don't care about the constitution
 
Thing1 said:
That isn't true, at all. Very few rights are unlimited.

It's really like saying slander is protected under the Constitution, because it's speech.
Click to expand...

Either you believe the right to free speech and self defense are inherent rights or you don’t.

We know you don’t. You believe your rights come from government which means they can be taken away

It is always amazing to watch you lefties twist yourselves in knots since you have no underlying principles

You believe wholeheartedly in a right that was never outlined in the Constitution yet shit on one that is clear and explicit

The intent of the US Constitution was to apply solely to the federal government. Individual states could restrict guns. If you truly believed in federalism you would have no argument with me, but you don’t believe in federalism.
 
I Love America said:
Either you believe the right to free speech and self defense are inherent rights or you don’t.

We know you don’t. You believe your rights come from government which means they can be taken away

It is always amazing to watch you lefties twist yourselves in knots since you have no underlying principles

You believe wholeheartedly in a right that was never outlined in the Constitution yet shit on one that is clear and explicit

The intent of the US Constitution was to apply solely to the federal government. Individual states could restrict guns. If you truly believed in federalism you would have no argument with me, but you don’t believe in federalism.
Click to expand...

None of that had anything to do w/ what I said. Oh, and you still have that issue of projecting what you think "Joe Liberal" would say onto me, without even a word to back it up. That's an instant fail, just so's you know.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top