Fox News says Mueller report did NOT clear Trump

reagansghost said:
Fox News urged viewers to read Robert Mueller’s report in its entirety on Tuesday, emphasizing that the special counsel did not exonerate President Donald Trump.

While covering the battle between House Democrats and the Justice Department over the Mueller report, Smith noted that the Russia investigation found multiple instances of potential obstruction on behalf of Trump, but that the special counsel followed DOJ guidelines in declining to prosecute the sitting president.

“Remember, in his 400-plus page report — that everyone in America should read, everyone — Robert Mueller laid out ten instances of apparent obstruction of justice, criminal obstruction of justice, potentially, by President Trump,” the Fox News anchor said. “The special counsel did not exonerate the president. They said if they could’ve they would’ve but they couldn’t so they didn’t.”

“Mueller explained that if he and his team had confidence that the president did not commit obstruction, they would have said so. He also said that under Justice Department guidelines, charging the president with a crime was never an option to him. He said the Constitution requires another process,” Smith continued, referring to Mueller’s suggestion that Congress take up his report.


https://www.mediaite.com/tv/shepard...he-mueller-report-it-did-not-exonerate-trump/
Click to expand...

you gonna rino Smith you fucking dupe republicans?
 
The Barr bottom line summary of the Mueller Report said, no collusion, insufficent evidence to pursue obstruction.

“Case closed”,,,..per McConnell.
 
Superfreak said:
If they couldn't reach a conclusion on Trump. Why did they investigate?
Click to expand...

To get to the truth, if he had decided Swampy was innocent, he could have said so, could not do so the other way around.

He determined that would be up to Congress to do something about, as he could not indict.
 
Southern Chicken said:
Is that what the Mueller report said?

Or does it actually states:
In analyzing the President's conduct related to Cohen, the following evidence is relevant
to the elements of obstruction of justice.
a. Obstructive act. We gathered evidence of the President's conduct related to Cohen
on two issues: (i) whether the President or others aided or participated in Cohen's false statements
to Congress, and (ii) whether the President took actions that would have the natural tendency to
prevent Cohen from providing truthful information to the government.
i. First, with regard to Cohen's false statements to Congress, while there is
evidence, described below, that the President knew Cohen provided false testimony to Congress
about the Trump Tower Moscow project, the evidence available to us does not establish that the
President directed or aided Cohen's false testimony.


Page 153
Click to expand...

DEAR FUCKING IDIOT


it calls trump an unindicted coconspirator you shit for brains


so yes the Mueller report says Trumpy ordered Cohen to lie for him


fuck you very much
 
The Barr bottom line summary of the Mueller Report said, no collusion, insufficent evidence to pursue obstruction.

“Case closed”,,,..per McConnell.
 
Earl said:
The Barr bottom line summary of the Mueller Report said, no collusion, insufficent evidence to pursue obstruction.

“Case closed”,,,..per McConnell.
Click to expand...

they don't own the nation fuck fart


how bout McConnels swampy wife too


cheating the nation for their own benefit


He took Russian money too you stupid fucking russo bot hole
 
The Barr bottom line summary of the Mueller Report said, no collusion, insufficent evidence to pursue obstruction.

“Case closed”,,,..per McConnell.
 
Jarod said:
To get to the truth, if he had decided Swampy was innocent, he could have said so, could not do so the other way around.

He determined that would be up to Congress to do something about, as he could not indict.
Click to expand...

A prosecutor doesn’t exonerate. He either finds enough evidence to charge someone or he doesn’t.

exonerate verb
ex·​on·​er·​ate | \ ig-ˈzä-nə-ˌrāt , eg-\
exonerated; exonerating
Definition of exonerate
transitive verb

1 : to relieve of a responsibility, obligation, or hardship
2 : to clear from accusation or blame
 
Southern Chicken said:
Then we have this:
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/...claim-trump-directed-cohen-to-lie-to-congress
Remember, Michael Cohen is a convicted liar.
https://chicago.suntimes.com/2019/2/27/18477742/remember-michael-cohen-is-a-convicted-liar
Click to expand...

Why did Trump hire Cohen if Cohen is such a liar?

And no, Mueller didn't rule out Trump ordering him to lie; like with Manafort, Mueller couldn't gather the evidence...the reason because Trump refused to be interviewed by Mueller.
 
Southern Chicken said:
A prosecutor doesn’t exonerate. He either finds enough evidence to charge someone or he doesn’t.

exonerate verb
ex·​on·​er·​ate | \ ig-ˈzä-nə-ˌrāt , eg-\
exonerated; exonerating
Definition of exonerate
transitive verb

1 : to relieve of a responsibility, obligation, or hardship
2 : to clear from accusation or blame
Click to expand...

Interesting that he "exonerated" Trump of Collusion.
 
LV426 said:
Why did Trump hire Cohen if Cohen is such a liar?

And no, Mueller didn't rule out Trump ordering him to lie; like with Manafort, Mueller couldn't gather the evidence...the reason because Trump refused to be interviewed by Mueller.
Click to expand...


Mueller didn't make a conclusion! Do I need to post the paragraph from the Mueller report again?

Let's ask Trump:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...michael-cohen-because-of-favor-on-condo-board

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-hired-michael-cohen-favor-long-time-ago-1237039


"A reporter made a good point in response to these insults, asking Trump: "If Cohen is such a bum, why did you hire him and have him on your payroll for 12 years and have him do so much of your dirty work?"

Trump responded: "Because a long time ago, he did me a favor. A long time ago he did me a favor."
 
Southern Chicken said:
Means the same thing.......No conclusion!
Click to expand...

No it doesn't!

It means "inconclusive" which doesn't mean "no conclusion".

And why was it inconclusive? Because Trump refused to be interviewed under oath. <---again, you left that part out. WHY?

Cohen, however, copped to Trump ordering him to do that it in his trial, which was under oath.

Now, why would an innocent person refuse to be interviewed under oath!?!?!
 
Southern Chicken said:
A prosecutor doesn’t exonerate. He either finds enough evidence to charge someone or he doesn’t.

exonerate verb
ex·​on·​er·​ate | \ ig-ˈzä-nə-ˌrāt , eg-\
exonerated; exonerating
Definition of exonerate
transitive verb

1 : to relieve of a responsibility, obligation, or hardship
2 : to clear from accusation or blame
Click to expand...

well those the rules allow him to indict


they cant indict a sitting president


OR

do you claim he can?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top