Yesterday, Lt Col Alexander Vindman, a member of the National Security Council, testified in Adam Schiff’s kangaroo court in the basement of the Capitol Building…the coup continues.
Several things became readily apparent:
1) NSC members are not supposed to wear their uniforms (the theatrical presence), and
2) Adam Schiff shut down ANY Republican questions, only allowing Democrats to question the witness, 3) Vindman admitted attempting to alter the President’s transcript of the Ukraine call but was unsuccessful in two cases,
4) Vindman admitted attempting to share the President’s classified call to other operatives.
Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/
Vindman claimed that there were at least two omissions in the White House transcript, so he set about to alter it to put the omissions back.
But the left wing NYT said that even with the phrases gone, the understanding of the transcript wasn’t changed.
But of course, the left is seizing on the transcript not being “exact” and shrieking that it was not a true transcript.
Vindman believes that if the Ukraine pursued the investigation of Hunter Biden, they would lose bipartisan support. So the coup continues again.
We have the possibility that this Lt Col violated US code 18 USC 798 in sharing a classified call with others.
~~
When Rep Jordan attempted to ask Vindman who he shared the information with, Adam Schiff shut down the question.
Vindman’s testimony causes serious problems for the President, even though it is fraught with the admission of leaking, altering a document, etc. If arrogance was against the US Code, we could probably prosecute Vindman for that.
Several things became readily apparent:
1) NSC members are not supposed to wear their uniforms (the theatrical presence), and
2) Adam Schiff shut down ANY Republican questions, only allowing Democrats to question the witness, 3) Vindman admitted attempting to alter the President’s transcript of the Ukraine call but was unsuccessful in two cases,
4) Vindman admitted attempting to share the President’s classified call to other operatives.
Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/
Vindman claimed that there were at least two omissions in the White House transcript, so he set about to alter it to put the omissions back.
But the left wing NYT said that even with the phrases gone, the understanding of the transcript wasn’t changed.
But of course, the left is seizing on the transcript not being “exact” and shrieking that it was not a true transcript.
Vindman believes that if the Ukraine pursued the investigation of Hunter Biden, they would lose bipartisan support. So the coup continues again.
We have undue influence or crimes possibly committed by an American connected to a high government official that may have caused serious national security issues and he didn’t want the US or the Ukraine to investigate it. What are his connections to Biden and the Democrats?
We have the possibility that this Lt Col violated US code 18 USC 798 in sharing a classified call with others.
~~
When Rep Jordan attempted to ask Vindman who he shared the information with, Adam Schiff shut down the question.
Vindman’s testimony causes serious problems for the President, even though it is fraught with the admission of leaking, altering a document, etc. If arrogance was against the US Code, we could probably prosecute Vindman for that.
