Vindman Tried to Alter Call Transcript. Failed

[Eagle_Eye]

It's endlessly amusing to me how you all constantly repeat the lies that "Hillary is just as dirty as Trump" as if 1) that absolves Trump of being a criminal, and 2) as if that were true. Despite countless years, uncounted dollars, and multiple investigations -- you all have yet to pin anything other than lying about a BJ on the Clintons. Yeah, yeah, Deep State garblegherkyaddyyaddy. If Hillary is as criminal as Trump, why on Earth did he do nothing about that when he had majorities in both chambers of Congress?

Waiting for the spin.......

as if 1) that absolves Trump of being a criminal,

Nope never said nor hinted that! but you keep repeating the lie.

you all have yet to pin anything other than lying about a BJ on the Clintons

Oh the old fall back excuse she wasn't charged with anything while completely ignoring the fact that the FBI said she committed the infractions but choose not to prosecute. That my dear does not make her innocent by any stretch of the word. As to Billy Bob he didn't just lie (sounds little) he committed perjury and was disbarred for it. No you can't white wash the crimes away.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Nope never said nor hinted that! but you keep repeating the lie.

What lie would that be? That Trump is accused of criminal wrong-doing? Why do you all keep bringing up Hillary then? Why aren't you addressing the concerns over Trump selling us down the river?

Oh the old fall back excuse she wasn't charged with anything while completely ignoring the fact that the FBI said she committed the infractions but choose not to prosecute. That my dear does not make her innocent by any stretch of the word. As to Billy Bob he didn't just lie (sounds little) he committed perjury and was disbarred for it. No you can't white wash the crimes away.

Wait a second. Trump claims that the Mueller report "completely exonerated" him... yet it did not. There was plenty of evidence of, among other things, obstruction of justice yet Mueller declined to recommend bringing charges ONLY because of the belief/tradition/internal rule that a sitting POTUS can not be indicted. Somehow, in your mind, that makes him clean while the exact same thing makes Hillary dirty? This still doesn't explain why Trump did nothing in the two years of complete control of the govt., to bring her to justice. Talk about a nothingburger!

 

[Ralph]

Yesterday, Lt Col Alexander Vindman, a member of the National Security Council, testified in Adam Schiff’s kangaroo court in the basement of the Capitol Building…the coup continues.
Several things became readily apparent:
1) NSC members are not supposed to wear their uniforms (the theatrical presence), and
2) Adam Schiff shut down ANY Republican questions, only allowing Democrats to question the witness, 3) Vindman admitted attempting to alter the President’s transcript of the Ukraine call but was unsuccessful in two cases,
4) Vindman admitted attempting to share the President’s classified call to other operatives.

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

Vindman claimed that there were at least two omissions in the White House transcript, so he set about to alter it to put the omissions back.
But the left wing NYT said that even with the phrases gone, the understanding of the transcript wasn’t changed.
But of course, the left is seizing on the transcript not being “exact” and shrieking that it was not a true transcript.

Vindman believes that if the Ukraine pursued the investigation of Hunter Biden, they would lose bipartisan support. So the coup continues again.


We have undue influence or crimes possibly committed by an American connected to a high government official that may have caused serious national security issues and he didn’t want the US or the Ukraine to investigate it. What are his connections to Biden and the Democrats?

We have the possibility that this Lt Col violated US code 18 USC 798 in sharing a classified call with others.
~~

When Rep Jordan attempted to ask Vindman who he shared the information with, Adam Schiff shut down the question.

Vindman’s testimony causes serious problems for the President, even though it is fraught with the admission of leaking, altering a document, etc. If arrogance was against the US Code, we could probably prosecute Vindman for that.

What I find amusing? His statements that the imbedded "none elected" bureaucrats have a duty and the power to usurp the authority and constitutional rights of the Executive branch "duly elected" POTUS. That's the mind set of these fascist assholes. Simply look at the historical heritage of this latest rat bastard asshole.....he grew up within a fascist system and was given liberty in the Untied States of America. Now he is attempting to import and force his engrained political heritage on our Republic. I say....to hell with UKRAINE and all their puppets...its time to give them back to their mother nation.....RUSSIA.

 

[Eagle_Eye]

What lie would that be? That Trump is accused of criminal wrong-doing? Why do you all keep bringing up Hillary then? Why aren't you addressing the concerns over Trump selling us down the river?



Wait a second. Trump claims that the Mueller report "completely exonerated" him... yet it did not. There was plenty of evidence of, among other things, obstruction of justice yet Mueller declined to recommend bringing charges ONLY because of the belief/tradition/internal rule that a sitting POTUS can not be indicted. Somehow, in your mind, that makes him clean while the exact same thing makes Hillary dirty? This still doesn't explain why Trump did nothing in the two years of complete control of the govt., to bring her to justice. Talk about a nothingburger!

Why aren't you addressing the concerns over Trump selling us down the river?

And just what river would that be?

Wait a second. Trump claims that the Mueller report "completely exonerated" him... yet it did not. There was plenty of evidence of, among other things, obstruction of justice yet Mueller declined to recommend bringing charges

That sounds remarkably similar to Comey and Hillary. but you all claim they never found anything on Hilary. LOL


You seem to forget I'm not a fan of Trump but unlike you I can see this get Trump at all costs has become a vendetta to you lefties.

 

[rjhenn]

Yesterday, Lt Col Alexander Vindman, a member of the National Security Council, testified in Adam Schiff’s kangaroo court in the basement of the Capitol Building…the coup continues.
Several things became readily apparent:
1) NSC members are not supposed to wear their uniforms (the theatrical presence), and
2) Adam Schiff shut down ANY Republican questions, only allowing Democrats to question the witness, 3) Vindman admitted attempting to alter the President’s transcript of the Ukraine call but was unsuccessful in two cases,
4) Vindman admitted attempting to share the President’s classified call to other operatives.

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

Vindman claimed that there were at least two omissions in the White House transcript, so he set about to alter it to put the omissions back.
But the left wing NYT said that even with the phrases gone, the understanding of the transcript wasn’t changed.
But of course, the left is seizing on the transcript not being “exact” and shrieking that it was not a true transcript.

Vindman believes that if the Ukraine pursued the investigation of Hunter Biden, they would lose bipartisan support. So the coup continues again.


We have undue influence or crimes possibly committed by an American connected to a high government official that may have caused serious national security issues and he didn’t want the US or the Ukraine to investigate it. What are his connections to Biden and the Democrats?

We have the possibility that this Lt Col violated US code 18 USC 798 in sharing a classified call with others.
~~

When Rep Jordan attempted to ask Vindman who he shared the information with, Adam Schiff shut down the question.

Vindman’s testimony causes serious problems for the President, even though it is fraught with the admission of leaking, altering a document, etc. If arrogance was against the US Code, we could probably prosecute Vindman for that.

There's no coup. What there is, is a so far unsuccessful attempt to hold Trump responsible for his crimes. The accusations against the Bidens are, most likely, just another GOP witch hunt, such as they kept pushing at Hillary without any resulting charges. It's all just BS political theater, as we've come to expect from the GOP. Just another diversion from the reality of Trump.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

“I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained. This would all undermine U.S. national security. Following the call, I again reported my concerns to NSC’s lead counsel.” Lt Lt Col Vindman

~~

so we are not supposed to ask Zelensky to investigate because it might put aid at risk? WTF?

Vindmen has also been advising Ukraine on dealing around Guliani w/State instead.
WTF?
Does he work in the NSC or the USA -or for Ukraine?


More NSC moles left over from Obama

He works for the NSC, not the imperial (and unconstitutional) Presidency.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Lol, yes, he wanted what was omitted placed back in. He also objected to them putting it in the classified server. He objected to what the WH lawyers omitted, imagine that. He wanted the truth.

Truth is anathema to the GOP and Trump supporters.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

I do not believe his story will change, he appears to be a man of character, unlike Trump, who wouldn’t testify because his lawyers are afraid he’ll lie.

You mean because his lawyers know he'll lie, or cry like a baby.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Let's see the Col. is a registered Democrat, close to Biden of course his testimony would never be biased in any way.

Have you got anything to support that, or is it just the usual wishful thinking?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

You're absolutely wrong. In a court the transcript that was released would be suspect because witnesses may testify that it did not contain all that was said. Another way to look at it: Two parties in court are arguing about a contract breach. One party produces a copy of the contract but a page is missing, and that page possibly changes the outcome of the contract breach complaint. If the other party can show that a page is missing, how do you think the judge will rule? Okay to go ahead with the partial contract, or with the entire document?

You guys need some better arguments.

That would require rational thought.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[Darth Omar]

Have you got anything to support that, or is it just the usual wishful thinking?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

The Vindman dude is sketchy.

 

[rjhenn]

This is the same thing the republican party did to John Kerry


a hero with many medals of bravery and honorable service


The republican party has hated military service for a long time folks

It's not military service that they hate. It's truth that they hate. And military veterans are more likely to tell truths that the GOP doesn't like.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

starting to stink??

Yes this WB is a Democratic operative - who colluded with the Schiff staff

More partisan BS.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

areyou clueless about everything? asking Zelensky for a favor to investigate corruption is perfectly fine

Except that it's a violation of campaign finance law.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[Darth Omar]

Except that it's a violation of campaign finance law.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

No it isn’t lol.

 

[Eagle_Eye]

Have you got anything to support that, or is it just the usual wishful thinking?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Voter records show he is register Democrat and worked with Biden in the Obama administration. It's all documented get off your ass and prove me wrong, if you doubt me.

 

[rjhenn]

you don't understand the process,when you do then you can debate it

You don't believe that there is an actual process.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Brennan's plant believes he is Above the Law, as do many in the CIA, as we have learned....

Trump believes that he is above the law.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

There is nothing damning about the transcript you partisan twat. Yeah, it was so damning Trump released with total transparency.

You leftists are morons on steroids and mentally retarded to parrot the bullshit Adam Schiff feeds you.

Of course, Trump had the transcript altered before releasing it. You are a typical Trump cultist, blindly swallowing all the shit that Trump throws at you.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Don't try to put words in my mouth. Do a bio on Vindman and you will see he is a registered Democrat (no big deal) but then you find that he worked directly for Biden and as an higher ranking officer I would have expected him to remain neutral and only come forward if he had witnessed illegal activity, which has not been proven happened at this point. Thus far I have yet to see a real smoking gun. The only info we get is biased for and against. Now that this kangaroo court has been brought into the light we may finally start getting some real answers.


Vindman claims he voiced his concerns to his superiors and they did nothing. Are you suggesting these people most likely veterans also aren't honest? That is what you are saying about me.


Now I put it to you if a person running for office has committed or abetted in shall we say devious dealings and his opponent believes it may have happened isn't that person bound to bring that to light?

It's just the usual right-wing witch hunt.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk