Look a little closer buddy, your hate group is being disposed of by the voters across this country, Your hate group is toast, Either through this unveiling of the true drive being hate or in just a few years demographics making you old fat white men a minority. Tell me how your going to get a person of color to vote for you in enough numbers to help your hate group stay in power, that after treating them like shit for decades ,
Now they admit to a Quid Pro Quo...
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Conservatism is antithetical to democracy; they've spent the last 55 years trying to destroy the institution of government in order to serve greedy, racist interests.
How does that provide "balance"?
As I said, there already are "conservative" voices in the Democratic Party...several of them are running for President.
Conservatism has spent the last 55 years doing everything they could to destroy the institution of government.
So why include them in anything?
The problem isn't the party, it's the ideology. No matter what, Conservatism will always end up as a force intended to destroy government. So since they are hostile to our Republic and the government that runs it, they should have no part in it at all. No matter what, Conservatism will always be the voice for the racists, for rich and corporate interests, and for religious fundamentalism. The whole belief system is morally, ethically, and fiscally bankrupt. It cannot be allowed to survive and it affords nothing beneficial to society.
Keeping "conservatism" around for the sake of balance is pointless; Conservatism is nothing but bad faith.
There are two perspectives in the whole world as far as politics is concerned , Liberal and conservative. All countries that have more then one party has one that is liberal and one that is conservative. If it has only one political perspective a liberal and conservative, it's a dictatorship, if you outlaw a perspective or party it is a dictatorship, if you have a country where there is two party's both being conservative or progressive , it's a dictatorship hiding behind the trappings of a democracy. What your suggesting is a dictatorship. We can end this debate easily, you can't make me support having a dictatorship and in no way will I support what your saying and you have no argument to justify supporting a dictatorship. So all we are going to do is continue to say the exact things over and over. I have my position that obviously you don't support and you have a position I would never support.
No, that's a gross ovesimplification that wades into BoThSiDeRiSm which is exactly the problem. BoTh SiDeS legitimizes bad faith conservatism, and leads to greater division and polarization. BoTh SiDeS are not the same, and conservatism isn't a balance to liberalism. Given the evil Conservatism has perpetuated the last 55 years, it's hard to see how including it as a voice in politics benefits anyone other than the narrow interests that are propping it up.
Conservatism is like a walker in The Walking Dead; it eats everything around it, it infects those it touches, and it needs to be put down.
And the "conservative" parties in all those countries is made up of racists, frauds, liars, and cheats. We're seeing that play out right now in the UK.
The only way it would be "outlawed" is if the elected representatives passed a bill to do so. And they would only be able to do that if they won the elections. And we've banned political parties in the past, so it's not unprecedented. So it's hard to see how destroying the GOP leads to a dictatorship when it would only be destroyed by the lawmakers who were elected by the democratic process.
As I said, there are plenty of Conservative voices in the Democratic Party. In fact, most of the Democrats running for President are conservative.
No, a dictatorship is when one person leads the entire country. I'm not calling for that at all. What I'm calling for is the destruction of the party whose goal is to destroy the government.
What sense does it make to allow people in the government whose goal is to destroy it?
How many times is conservatism going to let you down before you give up on it as legitimate?
Sorry buddy at this point i won't waste anymore time reading your posts , you can keep it all for yourself , I don't believe in your conspiracy silliness.
What conspiracy?
I would wager that the "conspiracy" lies in the wisdom that you can compromise with bad faith; why would forces urge compromise with bad faith instead of its destruction?
Getin the ring
Verified User
I love how liberals are trying to ignore what Willy Barr is about to bring down on their heroes
hammer time
hammer time
You have been saying that forever, when? Oh, I know, after next November, when the investigation simply dies away.
oh yeah, I forgot that is what this thread was about. It is about made up, speculative crazy right-wing conspiracies. But for you, they all are.
Tell me Einstein what does that have to do with the thread or scum bag. Anyone you list or throw ignorance around about, can't justify what your pile of shit leader did. You clowns are so predictable . Scum bag has lied over 14000 times while in office , ya but Obama wasn't born here. Scum bag is nothing but a criminal, ya but Obama lied. Scum bag is failure in business, ya but Clinton killed people. scum bag is insane , ya but Obama lied, scum bag belongs in jail , you but Biden's 3rd cousin twice removed got a job he wasn't qualified to do/ These are the only thing you idiots have left to argue with, basically you have no response other then this type of ignorance and boy are you weaklings boring.