Sanders , Warren , Klobuchar are running against Trump and Booker and Harris have publicly called for Trump's impeachment. So They should recuse themselves to.Both have already made public statements of being partial.
What a crock if they are allowed to swear impartiality with no objections.
Justice Roberts, we are counting on you.
Reject both of them!
Sanders , Warren , Klobuchar are running against Trump and Booker and Harris have publicly called for Trump's impeachment. So They should recuse themselves to.
^stuck on moron.![]()
^stuck on moron.![]()
None of that correct. And Schiff did nothing wrong. it was Trump who did.
Did you read the thread at all? They were not mentioned. a righty deflecting with a lie is nothing new.
Stupid fuck, the House and the Senate have two different sets of responsibilities and rules when it comes to impeachment. By signing the oath, those fuckers either lied before or are now lying under oath.
When did Democrats show impartiality you clueless retard. Good God you give stupid a bad name.
Sanders , Warren , Klobuchar are running against Trump and Booker and Harris have publicly called for Trump's impeachment. So They should recuse themselves to.
So it was Trump who did something wrong now? Wow, that's impartial! The senate's job here is to set the rules of the trial according to the constitution and applicable laws. That's what McConnell and Graham and the rest swore to. When I say AND THE REST, I mean Roberts swore in EVERY senator. That includes the jackasses. Do you think THEY are going to be "impartial"? Shifty, the gonad and nazi nancy set the rules for the house "inquiry", they came up with all this overwhelming bombshell evidence that was supposed to have us all begging in a loud, desperate and nonpartisan voice to bury the president under the prison and never see the light of day again. You got exactly what you wanted from the partisan house, now you're gonna get exactly what we said you were gonna get from a partisan senate. Suck on it
So it was Trump who did something wrong now? Wow, that's impartial! The senate's job here is to set the rules of the trial according to the constitution and applicable laws. That's what McConnell and Graham and the rest swore to. When I say AND THE REST, I mean Roberts swore in EVERY senator. That includes the jackasses. Do you think THEY are going to be "impartial"? Shifty, the gonad and nazi nancy set the rules for the house "inquiry", they came up with all this overwhelming bombshell evidence that was supposed to have us all begging in a loud, desperate and nonpartisan voice to bury the president under the prison and never see the light of day again. You got exactly what you wanted from the partisan house, now you're gonna get exactly what we said you were gonna get from a partisan senate. Suck on it
He is talking about an oath, they are taking an oath to fulfill the duties of an impartial juror in a Senate trial, which the whole world knows is the last thing Mitch and Lindsey are going to do, they have even admitted such, so they are lying, and again the whole world knows it, even though it won't get as much as a whisper on Fox. Certainly pulls the rug out from beneath Lindsey the next time he goes into one of his phony moral outrages on TV
But that is fine, I'd expect nothing less from the likes of Mitch and Lindsey, plays right into Pelosi's aims, right from the jump the whole Senate "trial" has been exposed itself as a charade, this is just further evidence for public consumption
Has any Senate Democrat said that they have made up their mind before the articles even hit the Senate? Has any Senate Democrat said that they would work closely with the impeachment managers to make sure they get the verdict they want?
Next



Has any Senate Democrat said that they have made up their mind before the articles even hit the Senate?
Has any Senate Democrat said that they would work closely with the impeachment managers to make sure they get the verdict they want?
This whole escapade is a charade intended for public consumption lol.
Ah, no, they haven't said anything regarding their role as juror in a Senate impeachment trial nor how they intend to vote before they even heard all the evidence presented before them, Mitch and Lindsey have, and Mitch even went beyond, admitting he was working closely with the White House defense team
I'm a Cunt, the evidence against Trump is overwhelming.
Both have already made public statements of being partial.
What a crock if they are allowed to swear impartiality with no objections.
Justice Roberts, we are counting on you.
Reject both of them!
What you are missing is that no one expects the Senate to do anything other than what Mitch has pretty much said it will, put on a show trial, which is exactly what Pelosi is hoping. The jury she wants to win is public opinion not some shame Senate trial, and actions like today put it on the right path
Sure, at this point, what else it, has been since the Trump's lackeys in the House attempted to make it a circus for TV, as I said, Pelosi isn't after the verdict of a sham trial in Mitch's Senate, that isn't the jury she wants to convince of Trump's behavior, but rather public opinion, the one that will count next November
Have ANY Democrats NOT made their minds up about Trump? You can't be this mentally retarded. Seriously.![]()
Impartial??? You really are too dishonest and stupid for words. These comments are before there is even a trial shit-for-brains:
Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York, called anew for fresh evidence and testimony from key White House officials for the Senate impeachment trial.
"What is President Trump hiding?" Schumer said Monday.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) declared in April that President Trump ought to be impeached over the findings of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report — even though the report absolved him of so-called “Russia collusion”
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) supported an impeachment inquiry in May, calling the president a “pathological liar” Sanders added that he wanted President Trump impeached — before an inquiry had been completed
Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) has suggested that he will vote to remove Trump for allegedly violating his oath of office
Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO), a lower tier candidate, has already suggested he will vote to remove Trump
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), who recently dropped out of the race, supports removing the president from office:
Trump is pressuring another foreign government to dig up dirt on a political opponent.
We need a new commander in chief—and we need to absolutely begin impeachment proceedings. He’s gotta go
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), an earlier dropout from the race, supported impeachment enthusiastically, leaving little doubt that she, like her colleagues, has already made up her mind to vote to remove Trump from office:
The House should begin impeachment hearings immediately.
Enough is enough.
We can’t let the president abuse his office for political gain without accountability.
I have to laugh at leftist asshats and the PHONY media bloviating about a FAIR trial. Morons.
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media...-who-have-made-up-their-minds-on-impeachment/