If the DNC cheats Bernie, will we see a replay of 1968 in Milwaukee?

If the DNC cheats Bernie, will we see a replay of 1968 in Milwaukee?

  • Total voters
    14
  • Poll closed .
Those poor dumb bernie Bro's. No clue what they are walking into in Milwaukee. They dont understand that a great many actually WANT them to get out of hand. This way they can be dealt with. The Reichstag fire decree= Milwaukee fire. :thinking:
 
Stone said:
Those poor dumb bernie Bro's. No clue what they are walking into in Milwaukee. They dont understand that a great many actually WANT them to get out of hand. This way they can be dealt with. The Reichstag fire decree= Milwaukee fire.
Click to expand...


Those who refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.


 
"The Reichstag Fire Decree permitted the regime to arrest and incarcerate political opponents without specific charge, dissolve political organizations, and to suppress publications. It also gave the central government the authority to overrule state and local laws and overthrow state and local governments."
 
Bernie was not cheated last time. He was an independent who was allowed to debate Hillary on the Dems dime. His national reputation was thanks to the Dems. He was never close to beating her. Once a right wing mantra is established, the rights repeat it like Catholics at church. HUMAHUMMA HUMMA,We all pray.
 
Nordberg said:
Bernie was not cheated last time. He was an independent who was allowed to debate Hillary on the Dems dime. His national reputation was thanks to the Dems. He was never close to beating her. Once a right wing mantra is established, the rights repeat it like Catholics at church. HUMAHUMMA HUMMA,We all pray.
Click to expand...

Tell that to a bernie bro,....see how they react. LOL
 
Nerdberg said:
Bernie was not cheated last time. He was an independent who was allowed to debate Hillary on the Dems dime. His national reputation was thanks to the Dems. He was never close to beating her. .
Click to expand...

Donna Brazile begs to differ.

No,” Bernie Sanders responded in an April 2016 interview when asked by NBC’s Chuck Todd whether he thought the DEMOCRAT Party had been fair to him in his primary challenge against Hillary Clinton, the presumptive presidential nominee. “Look, we’re taking on the establishment. That’s pretty clear.”

Days earlier, on the eve of the DEMOCRAT primary in New York, the Vermont senator had accused the Clinton campaign of improperly subsidizing the former secretary of state’s presidential bid through the Hillary Victory Fund, the joint vehicle her campaign set up with the DEMOCRAT National Committee and 32 state party committees.

Although he eventually campaigned for Clinton after she clinched the nomination, Sanders spent the next several months claiming that the primary system was “rigged” against him, only to be roundly dismissed by party leadership. But according to Donna Brazile, who served as the interim D.N.C. chairwoman after Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s ouster, Sanders’s accusations were hardly baseless.

Brazile says she found concrete “proof” that the Clinton campaign stacked the deck: an August 2015 document outlining the “Joint Fund-Raising Agreement between the D.N.C., the Hillary Victory Fund, and Hillary for America” that effectively allowed Clinton to control the D.N.C.’s purse strings.

With the D.N.C. millions of dollars in debt after Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election bid, the organization was in desperate need of cash, leaving the party with little choice but to rely on Clinton’s donors to recapitalize. But much of the money was ultimately routed back to Clinton. As she learned, the Hillary Victory Fund was little more than a “fund-raising clearing house” for the Clinton campaign.

The questionable nature of the Hillary Victory Fund was no secret during the DEMOCRAT primary. As details of the arrangement emerged in the spring of 2016, the joint fund-raising effort drew a great deal of scrutiny from the Sanders camp, the Vermont senator’s supporters, and the state party committees that signed on.

In July, e-mails released by WikiLeaks revealed that party officials and the Clinton campaign sought to bury the particulars of the deal and tamp down criticism directed at the fund.


https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/11/donna-brazile-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders
 
Teflon Don said:
No it does not. It means they are pragmatic
Click to expand...

So try to help me with the current conspiracy theories, because the Right keeps changing them.
The Left is Marxist, but the Democrats are more pragmatic. So they do want Marxism, but not a candidate who openly uses scary words like "Socialism," right?
 
Nordberg said:
Bernie was not cheated last time. He was an independent who was allowed to debate Hillary on the Dems dime. His national reputation was thanks to the Dems. He was never close to beating her. Once a right wing mantra is established, the rights repeat it like Catholics at church. HUMAHUMMA HUMMA,We all pray.
Click to expand...

YUP
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top