How many of you kooks...

Jarod said:
I have always liked her, I am not your normal Democrat. She has 0 scandal and is very progressive.
Click to expand...

As I said you're a cunt so that makes sense. She's a kamal cunt and she didn't receive one delegate in the primaries but the cunt will be "president" after the one imbecile piglosi gets rid of the other imbecile, lying racist groping imbecile Joe. We will then have a "president" that no one wanted
 
Yakuda said:
As I said you're a cunt so that makes sense. She's a kamal cunt and she didn't receive one delegate in the primaries but the cunt will be "president" after the one imbecile piglosi gets rid of the other imbecile, lying racist groping imbecile Joe. We will then have a "president" that no one wanted
Click to expand...

How many delegates did Pence get?
 
Still I don’t give a shit how many delegates she got. Being good at getting delegates has very little to do with being a good president.
 
Jarod said:
I was asking what your meaning was in the context you used the phrase, I cant be more specific than that, thats why I asked.
Click to expand...

Trump was a Russian asset: hoax
Russia stole the election: hoax
Trump conspired with Russia to steal the election: hoax
Russian pee tapes: hoax
Steele Dossier: hoax

That should about cover it.
 
Darth Omar said:
Trump was a Russian asset: hoax
Russia stole the election: hoax
Trump conspired with Russia to steal the election: hoax
Russian pee tapes: hoax
Steele Dossier: hoax

That should about cover it.
Click to expand...

I disagree with the word 'hoax', because I don't think anyone of any consequence claimed those things to be true, other than portions of the Steele Dossier which was at least in part accurate.

I do agree that Trump was not what I would call a 'Russian asset', Russia attempted to steal the election (but was not really that successful), there is no evidence Trump* 'conspired' to steal the election, and there is no evidence of the pee tapes.

There is clear Obstruction of Justice in the investigation, and that might be why there is no evidence for some of those things.




You still haven't answered by question about who will most likely be sworn in January 20? I can understand why you would be too pussy to answer.
 
Jarod said:
I disagree with the word 'hoax', because I don't think anyone of any consequence claimed those things to be true, other than portions of the Steele Dossier which was at least in part accurate.

I do agree that Trump was not what I would call a 'Russian asset', Russia attempted to steal the election (but was not really that successful), there is no evidence Trump* 'conspired' to steal the election, and there is no evidence of the pee tapes.

There is clear Obstruction of Justice in the investigation, and that might be why there is no evidence for some of those things.






You still haven't answered by question about who will most likely be sworn in January 20? I can understand why you would be too pussy to answer.
Click to expand...

The alleged president elect Biden will most likely be sworn in January.
 
And the hoax Russian investigation was a pretext to get Trump to obstruct ‘the investigation’ and it nearly worked. I was pretty sure it would, at one point.

These things aren’t hard to figure out.
 
Darth Omar said:
And the hoax Russian investigation was a pretext to get Trump to obstruct ‘the investigation’ and it nearly worked. I was pretty sure it would, at one point.

These things aren’t hard to figure out.
Click to expand...

So you admit he obstructed?
 
Darth Omar said:
Indulge us.

You goof balls went on for over three years over the Russian hoax.
Click to expand...

Hoax? How many Trumpies aware convicted for exactly that? Ask Popadopolous, Manafort, Stone and others who Trump will have to be pardoned from their crimes of working with Russia.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top