Tennessee bans teaching critical race theory in schools
- Thread starter Text Drivers are Killers
- Start date
^ Good post.
You're a doosh, but I generally agree with you on the larger issue.
Just keep in mind that it IS within the purview of locals to determine what the kiddies learn, at least up to a point.
So Drag 101 in Los Angeles, and no CRT in Memphis.
So what you are saying is ... "IT IS OK FOR THE FEDS TO CRAM CRT DOWN THE STATES THROATS ... BUT IT IS NOT OKAY FOR THE STATES TO REFUSE IT"
Methinks there is something WRONG with that picture
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
When you look closely at the origins of critical race theory, you find that it is thoroughly Marxist. Critical race theory was derived from critical legal theory and that from critical pedagogy. Critical pedagogy was the invention of radical Marxist Paulo Freire, a Brazilian Communist and revolutionary. The central tenant of critical pedagogy is that all education is indoctrination and propaganda to further the cause of the revolution.
Offshoots like critical race theory take that same line of thinking and apply it to other areas of thinking. In the case of critical race theory, it is applied to race. That is, the purpose of critical race theory is to turn those exposed to it into mindless, unthinking racists and bigots. It pits one race against another to create chaos and division that furthers a Marxist revolution.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/critical-race-theory
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...heory-heres-why-its-controversial/5046548001/
https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/critical-race-theory-fight/
All of the leading "academics" in the fields of critical pedagogy and critical race theory are avowed and openly Marxist. Their goal is to undermine society and create enough strife and hate through tribalism to incite a revolution that will allow the Marxists to take over and create a new Communist utopia, just as they've done in so many countries before.
Critical race theory, like critical pedagogy, is dangerous. It doesn't look to hold a debate or institute a discussion of ideas, but rather to indoctrinate through propaganda those exposed to it for the purposes of creating a violent Marxist revolution.
Offshoots like critical race theory take that same line of thinking and apply it to other areas of thinking. In the case of critical race theory, it is applied to race. That is, the purpose of critical race theory is to turn those exposed to it into mindless, unthinking racists and bigots. It pits one race against another to create chaos and division that furthers a Marxist revolution.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/critical-race-theory
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...heory-heres-why-its-controversial/5046548001/
https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/critical-race-theory-fight/
All of the leading "academics" in the fields of critical pedagogy and critical race theory are avowed and openly Marxist. Their goal is to undermine society and create enough strife and hate through tribalism to incite a revolution that will allow the Marxists to take over and create a new Communist utopia, just as they've done in so many countries before.
Critical race theory, like critical pedagogy, is dangerous. It doesn't look to hold a debate or institute a discussion of ideas, but rather to indoctrinate through propaganda those exposed to it for the purposes of creating a violent Marxist revolution.
crazy talk. by all accounts CRT is a Marxist indoctrination technique.Banning and censorship are anti-freedom.
Fuck Russia. Fuck China. Both love banning shit and love dictating to people what the think and believe. This law, and any like it, are on the dark path to enslaving their own people.....with your full support which is no surprise.
And you say we have to stand around with our thumbs up our ass and just take it?
WTF? dude do you have any kids? would you want them brainwashed??
Don't be surprised if he says YES
Dutch is a rigid old school thinker.
But he's also a self described asshat - so who knows?
gemini104104
Verified User
Aside from your fact free bullshit, not all of Tennessee banned it because not all of Tennessee has it heads in a GQP shithole against Democracy, the common decency of society and its well being as another GQP violation of U.S. Constitutional law.
As long as all can be backed up with facts, I'm good with it.
I don't agree with several aspects of CRT; it's a perspective, but IMO it's not a complete one. More Unicorns and Rainbows than fact.
That said, I'm against citizens empowering their States to censor and I'm especially against the Federal government censoring anything.
It's one thing to restrict information such as porn from minors just as we restrict alcohol from minors or don't let them drive, but a full adult citizen shouldn't have to look to their State or the fucking Feds for permission to learn about something.
What happens when some do-gooders decide this book should be censored? https://www.militarynewbie.com/wp-c...ions-Handbook-1969-Department-of-the-Army.pdf
Improvised Munitions Book
Each state has the power to censor and, to an extent, so do the Feds. I do not trust such power in the hands of others because it can be too easily abused. First it's this CRT bullshit. Next it will be something more important since, as the Democrats have been doing for years with gun control, this is how it starts; one step at a time.
While I agree, banning and censorship are authoritarian solutions. Good in Russia and China, not so good for the US of A.
Which parts didn't ... LINK
Darth Omar
Russian asset
TN chose a path away from indoctrinating their public school kids with poison.
More power to them.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
CRT isn't "knowledge" it's bullshit hate wypipo Commie stuff designed to divide Americans.
I'm from a different era. There wasn't racism everywhere when I was growing up in America. Actually, it was fine from the late 60s until Obama.
generalized gobbledegook. Like I said you have a rigid mind
Agreed on the importance of learning from history as the George Santayana quote states.
CRT isn't history; it's a perspective on racism in the US...and a perspective that is flawed IMO. Although I'm against banning it, I'm also not a supporter of teaching it....at least as a stand alone theory.
Most of the "white privilege" bullshit is simple democracy. 13% of the population is African-American. About 60% is Euro-American and about 19% is Hispanic, which is a culture and a blend of South/Central Americans and Euro-Americans.
Rounding that off, in a room with 10 people, 6 are white, 2 are Hispanic and, 1 is black and 1 represents everyone leftover. In a vote to name a science building with the choices of Albert Einstein, Luis Walter Alvarez, George Washington Carver or Chien-Shiung Wu, if Albert Einstein wins, is that "white privilege" or democracy in action? Hint: It's democracy. Only the race-baiting assholes claim it's racist.
https://usafacts.org/data/topics/pe...-and-demographics/population-data/population/
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualizing-u-s-population-by-race/
s of 2019, here is the current distribution of the U.S. population by race and ethnicity:
White: 60.1% (Non-Hispanic)
Hispanic: 18.5%
Black: 12.2%
Asian: 5.6%
Multiple Races: 2.8%
American Indian/Alaska Native: 0.7%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander: 0.2%
Dude, you can't even comprehend why mold grows in your mop bucket.