DeSantis attempting to kill Florida Cruise Industry

You do not have natural immunity from COVID if you've already been infected with COVID.

You are just as vulnerable to variants as unvaccinated people are.

Another study last week out of Qatar, which has also used the Pfizer vaccine, estimated the effectiveness of the vaccine against any B.1.351 infection was about 75% — a strong result, if a drop from its performance in clinical trials before the emergence of B.1.351. Overall, however, the vaccine was 97.4% effective against severe, critical, or fatal disease caused by any variant that was circulating in the country, including B.1.351. “The reduced protection against infection with the B.1.351 variant did not seem to translate into poor protection against the most severe forms of infection,” the researchers wrote.
https://www.statnews.com/2021/05/13/vaccines-work-variants-complicated/
Pfizer COVID vaccine protects against worrying coronavirus variants
Data from Qatar provide strongest evidence yet that COVID-19 vaccines can stop strains thought to pose a threat to immunization efforts.
Ewen Callaway

Gloved hands holding Pfizer vaccines.
Doses of the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine being prepared in Toronto, Canada.Credit: Steve Russell/Toronto Star/Getty

Qatar’s second wave of COVID-19 was a double whammy. In January, after months of relatively few cases and deaths, the Gulf nation saw a surge driven by the fast-spreading B.1.1.7 variant, which was first identified in the United Kingdom. Weeks later, the B.1.351 strain, which is linked to reinfections and dampened vaccine effectiveness, took hold.

Amid this storm, researchers in Qatar have found some of the strongest evidence yet that current vaccines can quell variants such as B.1.351. Clinical trials in South Africa — where B.1.351 was first identified — had suggested that vaccines would take a hit against such variants. But this study offers a fuller picture of what countries battling such variants can expect.


Who received the first billion COVID vaccinations?

People in Qatar who received two doses of the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine were 75% less likely to develop a case of COVID-19 caused by B.1.351 than were unvaccinated people, and had near-total protection from severe disease caused by that strain.

The findings — published on 5 May in The New England Journal of Medicine1 — suggest that current RNA vaccines are a potent weapon against the most worrisome immune-evading variants. Pfizer, based in New York City, and BioNTech, in Mainz, Germany, are developing an updated RNA vaccine targeting B.1.351, as is Moderna, based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Early results from Moderna’s efforts suggest that a booster shot of the updated vaccine triggers a strong response against B.1.351.

“I think this variant is probably the worst of all the variants we know,” says Laith Jamal Abu-Raddad, an infectious-disease epidemiologist at Weill Cornell Medicine—Qatar in Doha, who led the Qatari study. “We have the tools, despite these variants, to control at least the severe forms of infection — and this should work quite well on transmission.”

Weaker protection
Researchers in South Africa identified B.1.351 in late 2020, and it’s now the predominant strain there. Laboratory studies show that the variant harbours mutations that blunt the effects of virus-blocking antibodies, and trials suggest that some COVID-19 vaccines are significantly less effective against the strain than against others.

Early lab research suggested that RNA vaccines, including the Pfizer–BioNTech jab, would be weakened by B.1.351, but probably not fully compromised. In April, the companies announced that a small trial in South Africa had found the vaccine to be fully effective against B.1.351, but the study of 800 people recorded a total of just 6 infections caused by B.1.351 in the placebo group, so efficacy might have been much lower.


First evidence that COVID vaccines protect people against new variants

Abu-Raddad’s team analysed tens of thousands of COVID-19 cases that occurred between the start of Qatar’s vaccination campaign in late December and the end of March. Genome sequencing showed that B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 were the predominant coronavirus lineages during this period and, from mid-February, each accounted for about half of the country’s cases.

The researchers compared SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in vaccinated people with those in unvaccinated controls. People who received two vaccine doses were about 90% less likely to develop an infection caused by B.1.1.7, echoing findings from Israel, the United Kingdom and elsewhere. The researchers identified around 1,500 ‘breakthrough’ infections caused by the B.1.351 variant in vaccinated individuals, but only 179 of these occurred more than 2 weeks after the second dose. There were hardly any severe cases of COVID-19 caused by either B.1.1.7 or B.1.351 among fully vaccinated individuals.

“Even though there were breakthrough infections, they didn’t lead to hospitalization and death, except very, very rarely,” says Abu-Raddad. Two people died of COVID-19 caused by B.1.351 after receiving their second vaccine dose, but it is very likely that they were infected before the protective effects of the booster shot began. “If, a year ago, I told somebody we would have 75% effectiveness against the worst variants we had, they would consider this extremely good news,” Abu-Raddad adds.






But Madhi expects that other vaccines will also prevent severe disease caused by that variant. In another 5 May New England Journal of Medicine study2, his team reported that the jab produced by biotechnology company Novavax in Gaithersburg, Maryland, lowered the risk of getting COVID-19 by 60% in participants without HIV in a South African trial involving more than 6,000 people. As-yet unpublished data show that the vaccine was highly effective against severe cases of COVID-19 caused by B.1.351, with no cases in vaccinated individuals and five in the placebo arm.

If vaccine efficacy is lower against B.1.351, even highly successful immunization programmes in countries affected by the variant might not reduce cases to the same extent as in countries dealing with less troublesome strains, says Madhi. “Nevertheless, by protecting high-risk individuals, we could still return to a relatively normal lifestyle, even with ongoing circulation.”

Qatar, where more than one-third of the population has received at least one dose of the vaccine, might provide an early glimpse at how the worst coronavirus variants can be controlled. Abu-Raddad says there is evidence that the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine might also be highly effective at blocking transmission of B.1.351. And after cases of the variant peaked in mid-April, he says, “things have been going extremely well, the numbers are going down very, very rapidly”.

Nature 593, 325-326 (2021)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01222-5
 
Lasting immunity found after recovery from COVID-19[

*Lasting immunity...FOR A FEW MONTHS, according to your study:

However, 95% of the people had at least 3 out of 5 immune-system components that could recognize SARS-CoV-2 up to 8 months after infection.

And lasting immunity...FOR EIGHT MONTHS AGAINST THAT SPECIFIC VARIANT, but not others.

Also, your study here was of just 200 people.
 
LOL at you. You just posted that the vaccine was effective against other variants. Which has nothing to do with your claim that infection by one variant protects you from the others.

Your comedy act is hilarious, poser.
 
Says the sociopath who does nothing but. Buy a mirror you dishonest douchebag. :palm:

I haven't lied about myself because I don't talk about myself.

I don't feel the need to exaggerate or embellish personal details about myself in order to lend my arguments credibility they don't otherwise have.

Where were you on 1/6?
 
*Lasting immunity...FOR A FEW MONTHS, according to your study:
And lasting immunity...FOR EIGHT MONTHS AGAINST THAT SPECIFIC VARIANT, but not others.
Also, your study here was of just 200 people.

tenor.gif
 
So you are quoting a non-peer reviewed study that simply says that as of the time of the study, previously infected individuals appeared to have the same immunity as vaccinated individuals. The end date of the study was 3/12/2021.
It just came out. Give it time for new studies to confirm it. It came out from Cleveland Clinic which has high standards though its not a junk study. :laugh:
 
LOL at you. You just posted that the vaccine was effective against other variants. Which has nothing to do with your claim that infection by one variant protects you from the others.
Your comedy act is hilarious, poser.

I wish your stupidity was hilarious. But pathetic, ignorant, insufferable and moronic are the only adjectives that come to mind. :palm:
 
I haven't lied about myself because I don't talk about myself.
I don't feel the need to exaggerate or embellish personal details about myself in order to lend my arguments credibility they don't otherwise have.
Where were you on 1/6?

^This, is why you cannot argue with low IQ, lunatic dumb fucks like LyingVagina426. They make shit up that no one has typed. :palm:

tenor.gif


giphy.gif
 
that right there is just one example of your emotionally unstable outbursts. I want people to make their own choices. I don't want to FORCE others to do something they don't want to do.

What outburst? You're the one who is arguing against vaccinations.


I want people to make their own choices

The problem is that poor choices here end up affecting everyone else.

Your poor choices aren't made in a vacuum, and they will have societal impacts.

It's not freedom you're defending here.


I don't want to FORCE others to do something they don't want to do.

Well, unfortunately this very juvenile mindset doesn't conform with this thing called society.

What's clear is that you don't believe you have any social responsibility, and the reason you don't believe you have that is because you've never been held accountable for anything in your pathetic, mediocre, underachieving life.

No one has ever challenged you to be a better version of who you are, and because of that, you think everyone must accommodate YOU instead of the other way around.

Well, fuck you...if you contract COVID and die, I won't even be able to rub it in your fat, stupid face.
 
What outburst? You're the one who is arguing against vaccinations.

The problem is that poor choices here end up affecting everyone else.

Your poor choices aren't made in a vacuum, and they will have societal impacts.

It's not freedom you're defending here.

Well, unfortunately this very juvenile mindset doesn't conform with this thing called society.

What's clear is that you don't believe you have any social responsibility, and the reason you don't believe you have that is because you've never been held accountable for anything in your pathetic, mediocre, underachieving life.

No one has ever challenged you to be a better version of who you are, and because of that, you think everyone must accommodate YOU instead of the other way around.

Well, fuck you...if you contract COVID and die, I won't even be able to rub it in your fat, stupid face.

more emotional outbursts of ignorance and instability......you just cant quit yourself, can you?
 
more idiotic assumptions on your part. you just like making shit up when you're humiliated, don't you?

I notice how you always rush to this same tired nonsense whenever we try to have an honest conversation.

You just unilaterally declare these things, expecting everyone to accommodate that bad faith.

Get the vaccine or fucking die...I really don't care which.
 
I wish your stupidity was hilarious. But pathetic, ignorant, insufferable and moronic are the only adjectives that come to mind. :palm:

These fucking idiots are lining up for a vaccine to a virus that has a 98% recovery rate and doesnt prevent you from getting the virus it was supposedly created to deal with. Plus they still wear masks and then want to fuck people who don't get the vaccine. Fuck them
 
These fucking idiots are lining up for a vaccine to a virus that has a 98% recovery rate and doesnt prevent you from getting the virus it was supposedly created to deal with. Plus they still wear masks and then want to fuck people who don't get the vaccine. Fuck them

It's worse than just that. They then tell us that it doesn't matter whether or not you're vaccinated. You still need to distance and wear a mask. ;)
 
^This, is why you cannot argue with low IQ, lunatic dumb fucks like LyingVagina426. They make shit up that no one has typed.


You and your "very fine people" have this really bad habit where you invent people, circumstances, or scenarios that just so happen to confirm your biases, yet you refuse to verify any of it.
 
Back
Top