How many people did Democrats murder by knowingly lying about Hydroxochloroquine?

Well, it's better than stringing together a long, rambling, incoherent post that ultimately says nothing...like what you do.

And you posted five responses, seconds apart, to me! LOL.

Why is it that whenever you accuse someone of doing something, it's something you've already done yourself?

You mean the OP, where all the evidence you spent 30 pages trying to deny away the existence of is located? That's not posting nothing...that's posting the most important parts of the thread, imbecile...the basis of my argument.
 
I refer you to the literally first twenty fucking times I already did that.

You didn't do that, lazy boy.

All you did was respond with that thoughtless sentence, over and over.

So explain this fallacy, by all means...I don't think you can.


Not endlessly going in circles with you over an utterly retarded fucking fallacy that I've already debunked over and over, and over again.

No, you just called it a fallacy and then didn't explain why. And the fallacy you said it was isn't even a fallacy.

So how come you didn't do shit about the stolen election?

Don't you believe it was stolen, or do you just want other people to do the things you're too chickenshit to do yourself? That's why you posted for months the election was stolen, but then hid on JPP on 1/6 instead of doing anything about it.
 
What?

I've given you no reason to be sincere?

Think about what you post before you post it, dummy.

The most hilarious thing the most retarded "debater" on this site (you) could possibly come up with to say right now, and you found it. Calling someone else a dummy for correctly comprehending English where you failed to understand it, after you're epic failure to do anything but be wrong, get caught lying, and look like a total moron throughout this entire thread.

:rofl2:
 


Again with simply pretending away what is right there in the record for all to see. First you blindly denied the links I posted, over and over and over, and now you deny the answers I've posted, over, and over, and over. You are literally too retarded for adult conversation.

Yes, the record is plain for all to see and on this thread, you completely avoided answering for yourself.

I think we both know why...you're full of shit.
 
This is a good place to stop for now. You've sufficiently humiliated and discredited yourself enough for now. :laugh:

Good luck with that reading comprehension struggle. :cool:
 


Asked and answered. About 20 times now. Learn how to use the scroll button, Captain Literacy.

No it wasn't.

You all do this all the time, you say something stupid and then when asked to clarify, you refuse.

I can't help it that you can't keep track of what you say from post to post, nor can I help it that you egg people on to do the things you're too scared to do yourself.
 


I mean, it's right there for everyone to see that you're the one who's lying. Lie all you want. The proof is readily available, as long as you're able to read.

Which is why you haven't linked to it, copied it, or pasted it.

Because it doesn't exist and you're lying about it.

Just like how you lied about HCQ working.

Just like how you lied about the election being stolen.

Your goal is to goad someone into taking the action you are too chickenshit to take yourself.
 
You didn't go to some event. Therefore I've decided that you can't oppose election theft.

You said for months that the election was stolen, and that's significant...that's a direct threat to the Republic.

So explain why your actions didn't and don't rise to the level of the threat you were trying to posture?
 
This utterly retarded fallacy of yours...is an ad hominem fallacy, because it is attempting to shift the debate to attacking the debater instead of the argument they're making.

That's not ad hominem.

Ad hominem would be calling you a stupid, inbred, drooling, mouth-breathing sucker.

So, THIS is an ad hominem attack: You are a fucking moron who doesn't know what the fuck he's saying from post to post.

That's ad hominem, and your free English composition lesson for the day.

Throwing your argument into question because you've already lied in another argument also isn't ad hominem.

You have yet to establish credibility that can even be attacked on an ad hominem basis.

Wow, you are so full of shit. More than most Conservatives.
 
Nothing I said indicates anything like that, crack-smoker. :laugh:[/SIZE]

Everything you've said indicates that!

The three months of lies about the election being stolen, with no resulting action from you to do anything about it, indicates that you don't really believe the election was stolen.

After all, a stolen election would be a first for America, and a pretty fucking big deal.

And also, if the election was stolen by Biden, then it was also stolen by McConnell, Graham, Collins, and Tillis, so their election results need to be invalidated and they need to be removed from power, since everyone was on the same ballot.
 


ad hominem "only terrorists can oppose election theft" fallacy...

That's not a fallacy.

You avoiding your actions that day is the fallacy.

You want us to pretend you believe the election was stolen so long as it's convenient for you.
 


You mean the OP, where all the evidence you spent 30 pages trying to deny away the existence of is located? That's not posting nothing...that's posting the most important parts of the thread, imbecile...the basis of my argument.

You still can't account for why there is $2M worth of HCQ that has been sitting in Oklahoma for over a year.
 
The most hilarious thing the most retarded "debater" on this site (you) could possibly come up with to say right now, and you found it.

I've come up with two things, and you've avoided both:

1. If HCQ is a miracle, how come OK has been sitting on $2M worth of it for over a year?

2. If the election was truly stolen, how come you didn't do anything about it?

You avoided both of those questions, then lied about answering them.

You're just not an honest person.
 
Calling someone else a dummy for correctly comprehending English where you failed to understand it, after you're epic failure to do anything but be wrong, get caught lying, and look like a total moron throughout this entire thread.

This run-on sentence is incoherent babble.

You're a dummy because you think you're clever enough to pull a con on HCQ and your absence from anything meaningful on 1/6.

You're not as clever as you think you are.
 
Everything you've said indicates that!

The three months of lies about the election being stolen, with no resulting action from you to do anything about it, indicates that you don't really believe the election was stolen.

After all, a stolen election would be a first for America, and a pretty fucking big deal.

And also, if the election was stolen by Biden, then it was also stolen by McConnell, Graham, Collins, and Tillis, so their election results need to be invalidated and they need to be removed from power, since everyone was on the same ballot.

Actually, the first and only was Bush v. Gore and it should have caused a major uprising.

Bush v. Gore: The stolen election of 2000
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2010/12/elec-d13.html
 
Last edited:
This is a good place to stop for now. You've sufficiently humiliated and discredited yourself enough for now.


This is what insecure people tell themselves when their bullshit gets called out.

You're just a fucking phony coward, too chickenshit to act on your pretend convictions, too chickenshit to fight for the Republic, too chickenshit to even answer a question on an anonymous message board.

What a disappointment you must be to your parents.
 
I've come up with two things, and you've avoided both:

1. If HCQ is a miracle, how come OK has been sitting on $2M worth of it for over a year?

2. If the election was truly stolen, how come you didn't do anything about it?

You avoided both of those questions, then lied about answering them.

You're just not an honest person.
If it was stolen how come you didn't do anything about it. If it wasn't how come you didn't defend the Capital?
 
Back
Top