"52 ballots from a 2 bedroom home" - Former AZ Secretary of State

christiefan915 said:
That's a RW conspiracy theory. Our election law was passed by a bipartisan legislature with a repug majority.
Click to expand...

The part the GOP shills at JPP refuse to mention:

Trump politicized mail-in voting in 2020, but it came to PA with strong Republican support

The state law that legalized no-excuse mail-in voting was passed before COVID-19 as a compromise between Democrats and Republicans in Harrisburg.

Act 77, the Pennsylvania law that legalized no-excuse mail-in voting, came together in 2019 as a compromise between the Democratic and Republican parties. Republicans achieved their goal of abolishing straight-ticket voting, which Democrats agreed to in order to obtain the vote-by-mail expansion.

https://www.publicsource.org/trump-...-2020-pa-republicans-supported-it-originally/
 
christiefan915 said:
Boockvar is a voting-rights lawyer and there is nothing in PA law that says ballots can't be "cured." Eighteen states allow ballot curing including Florida, Iowa, Montana, Ohio and Utah, which went for trump in 2020.

Josh Hawley's conspiracy theory was debunked. "Hawley’s central argument is that a new [PA] state law about voting by mail — passed not "last year" but in the fall of 2019 — conflicts with the state’s constitution. The courts have not backed up his argument, and he omits the full story about the new law. The state constitution doesn’t have an explicit ban on mail-in voting, and the law permitting mail-in voting passed with strong Republican support."

Furthermore, there's no "in-person" voting requirement in our constitution.
Click to expand...
moving a postmark date is not curing..
Boockvar is a voting-rights lawyer
Click to expand...
JFC. you have voting rights lawyer overseeing the election?? how ripe for fraud is that??
 
anatta said:
you do realize that has nothing to do with "Trump's lawyers" SCOTUS would not hear because of standing
(which is farcical considering all the states are involved in a POTUS election)
Click to expand...

Yeah but, one state doesn't get to say how another state runs their elections. States' rights and all that.

On another note, Democrats were scheming on how to cheat the next election since 2016. First they started with the popular/electoral garbage, and it was several states all with Democrat governors doing it..

I don't think that albatross flew, but they're always scheming and kenniving.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Case after case has been brought before a judge and EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM was dismissed.
MANY of them for lack of evidence.
Click to expand...
you are repeating yourself. many were rejected for standing including the big one Tx vs. Pa

Just how do we get remediation -or ever a HEARING for remediation if the courts wont even look
claiming not "definitive" ( i forgot the legal term )-but courts rule well it wouldnt change the outcome -
so we arent going to hear it.

More importantly if we can't get transparency and rulings this time -how are we going to correct for next time??
 
Matt Dillon said:
Yeah but, one state doesn't get to say how another state runs their elections. States' rights and all that.

On another note, Democrats were scheming on how to cheat the next election since 2016. First they started with the popular/electoral garbage, and it was several states all with Democrat governors doing it..

I don't think that albatross flew, but they're always scheming and kenniving.
Click to expand...
not the basis for Tx vs. PA.
Tx claimed damages because their voters will was (in effect ) overturned by sloppy illegal
election in PA (etc.)
 
anatta said:
you are repeating yourself. many were rejected for standing including the big one Tx vs. Pa

Just how do we get remediation -or ever a HEARING for remediation if the courts wont even look
claiming not "definitive" ( i forgot the legal term )-but courts rule well it wouldnt change the outcome -
so we arent going to hear it.

More importantly if we can't get transparency and rulings this time -how are we going to correct for next time??
Click to expand...

If there is evidence of voter fraud, post it where the PUBLIC can see/read it.

SHOW people the "evidence" and create a groundswell of support.

Hiding behind the claim of "evidence" but refusing to post it where everyone can see it is the problem the GOP has right now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top