"52 ballots from a 2 bedroom home" - Former AZ Secretary of State

"On Monday, one day before voters who opt to vote in-person head to the polls, Wolf signed an executive order to extend the deadline for election offices in several of the state’s most populous counties – Allegheny, Dauphin, Delaware, Erie, Montgomery and Philadelphia – to accept absentee or mail-in ballot by mail until 5 p.m. June 9. The ballots that are mailed from voters in those counties still must be postmarked or hand-delivered to the county election office by 8 p.m. on Tuesday, just like in the state’s 61 other counties. But the difference is the mailed ballots from the other 61 counties must be in the county election office by 8 p.m. Tuesday to be counted whereas the ones from voters in those six counties don’t have to be received by their county election office until the following Tuesday and still will be counted."

Unfortunately for you...that refers to the primary, doesn't it?
 
Pennsylvania election officials have asked the state Supreme Court to allow them to count ballots without a postmark as long as they're received within three days of Election Day.

https://www.npr.org/2020/08/18/903490612/another-post-office-election-challenge-makings-sure-ballots-are-postmarked

"Election officials have asked..." on 8/18/20. And the Supreme Court answered on 10/19/20. I guess your beef is with the Chief Justice. :D

"The U.S. Supreme Court said Monday that election officials in Pennsylvania can count absentee ballots received as late as the Friday after Election Day so long as they are postmarked by Nov. 3.

The court declined without comment to take up one of the highest-profile election law cases in the final stretch before Election Day. Pennsylvania Republicans had sought to block the counting of late-arriving ballots, which the state's Supreme Court had approved last month.

Republicans sought the emergency stay, arguing that it is up to the state's legislature — not the court — to set rules for how elections are conducted. They also said the court's ruling could allow ballots cast after Election Day to be counted.

The court's most conservative justices — Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas — said they would have agreed to the stay request. But Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court's three most liberal members to reject the request."

https://www.npr.org/2020/10/19/9224...can-count-ballots-received-after-election-day

 
Who told you that?

Now, answer the question.

Who fact-checked Politifact, which is owned by the Poynter Institute?

Democracy Docket, Pennsylvania, 2020
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Order, Nov. 28, 2020
NBC, Hawley makes claim about legality of vote in Pennsylvania, Jan. 6, 2021
Pennsylvania, Voting in Pennsylvania, 2021
Washington Post, Two Republican lawyer-senators look for loopholes in democracy, Jan. 3, 2021
Sen. Josh Hawley, Sen. Hawley Will Object During Electoral College Certification Process On Jan 6, Dec. 30, 2020
Philadelphia Inquirer, The Trump campaign is suing Pennsylvania over mail ballot drop boxes, June 29, 2020
Philadelphia Inquirer, Pa.’s election system is on the verge of the largest changes in decades — in time for the 2020 election, Oct. 23, 2019
Philadelphia Inquirer, Pennsylvania Supreme Court tosses GOP congressman’s suit seeking to throw out all ballots cast by mail, Nov. 28, 2020
PolitiFact, Fact-checking Trump's false claims about Pennsylvania's election, Jan. 7, 2021
NBC Philadelphia, Pulling Apart U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley's Argument About Pennsylvania's 2020 Election, Jan. 7, 2021
Washington Post, Two Republican lawyer-senators look for loopholes in democracy, Jan. 3, 2020
Email interview, Adam Bonin, political law compliance lawyer and lead Philadelphia county counsel to the Biden-Harris campaign, Jan. 7, 2021
Email interview, University of Texas law professor Steve Vladeck on Jan. 7, 2021
Telephone interview, Edward Foley, Ohio State University law professor, Jan. 7, 2021
Email interview with Richard L. Hasen, law professor at the University of California-Irvine, Jan. 7, 2021
Email interview, Ellen Ford, Pennsylvania Department of State spokesperson, Jan. 8, 2021

https://www.politifact.com/factchec...hawleys-claim-about-pennsylvania-mai/#sources
 
Christiecrite "forgot" this little detail:

"Pennsylvania election officials have asked the state Supreme Court to allow them to count ballots without a postmark as long as they're received within three days of Election Day."


https://www.npr.org/2020/08/18/903490612/another-post-office-election-challenge-makings-sure-ballots-are-postmarked
 
03a092eefa60d39b5a7753ae3a14eb88.png


Poor Anchovies.

Leprosy, are we suppose to believe without questioning all those right wing disinformation site that, that you QAnon believers use??????????????
 
I guess your claim was debunked.

I'm not sure why you think that. On 10/19/20, "The U.S. Supreme Court said Monday that election officials in Pennsylvania can count absentee ballots received as late as the Friday after Election Day so long as they are postmarked by Nov. 3.

I also guess your pathetic attempt to pass off a June EO as pertaining to the General Election was debunked, too.

So you say. In the primary they were also given 3 extra days for counting, so long as the ballots were postmarked on Election Day.

Pennsylvania 2020 Primary Election/Act 35 of 2020 Report

Requiring ballots to be sent to voters earlier will only solve part of this problem,however. Some voters will not receive their ballots until only a day or two before an election; others will receive their ballot earlier but may not return it until closer to the election. To allow for all of these votes to be counted, the Department recommends that counties be required to count votes that are received by the county board of elections no later than the Friday following an election, provided that the envelopes have been postmarked by Election Day. Allowing ballots to be returned by the Friday after Election Day will allow ample time for all votes to be counted prior to the statutory deadline to order a statewide recount of any race that is decided by less than a 0.5% margin. Coupled with a change of date for counties to begin delivering or mailing ballots to voters, this change would provide eligible voters the greatest ability to cast their vote

https://www.dos.pa.gov/VotingElections/Documents/2020-08-01-Act35Report.pdf


:D
 
I'm not sure why you think that.

That's because you didn't read.

Christiecrite "forgot" this little detail:

"Pennsylvania election officials have asked the state Supreme Court to allow them to count ballots without a postmark as long as they're received within three days of Election Day."


https://www.npr.org/2020/08/18/903490612/another-post-office-election-challenge-makings-sure-ballots-are-postmarked
 
Christiecrite "forgot" this little detail:

"Pennsylvania election officials have asked the state Supreme Court to allow them to count ballots without a postmark as long as they're received within three days of Election Day."

https://www.npr.org/2020/08/18/903490612/another-post-office-election-challenge-makings-sure-ballots-are-postmarked

The little detail Y O U forgot is that whatever they asked the state Supreme Court became moot when the case went to SCOTUS.
 
Yes, 43,000 spread between AZ, WI and GA. Just like trump won in 2016 with 107,000 spread between PA, WI and MI. But Biden won the entire popular vote by 81.2 million v. 74.2 million, so even if trump had won that 43K he still would have lost the election.

Don't really understand your point. Laurence Tribe who is certainly no friend of Trump said the exact same thing.

 
The little detail Y O U forgot is that whatever they asked the state Supreme Court became moot when the case went to SCOTUS.

Is that so?

Did the SCOTUS tell Pennsylvania election officials they couldn't ballots without a postmark as long as they were supposedly received within three days of Election Day?
 
Leprosy, how much merit does the Gateway pundit deserve???????????????????

You sure are stupid, cum gargler.

There's a difference between debunking a report based on known facts and dismissing it without inspection because you don't like the source.
 
Yet you cited them in this thread.

I don't recall stating that I don't believe them.

I do recall asking who fact-checked them. And you can't, or won't answer.

I'm also not the one who cited them as proof of her claims.

My answer is that if one doesn't believe any fact-checker, it's incumbent on one to do his own fact-checking. You could be citing some RW rag that fact-checked Politifact but you didn't. Why is that, leggiecrite? Could it be the RW rags can't find fault with them?
 
Back
Top