"52 ballots from a 2 bedroom home" - Former AZ Secretary of State

If my maths are correct they both would have ended up on 269. How does the contingent election work?

What's it to you, what the election results are in this country, don't you have election results in your own country to worry about?????????????????
 
If my maths are correct they both would have ended up on 269. How does the contingent election work?


this....
It takes 270toWin. If neither candidate gets a majority of the 538 electoral votes, the election for President is decided in the House of Representatives, with each state delegation having one vote. A majority of states (26) is needed to win. Senators would elect the Vice-President, with each Senator having a vote. A majority of Senators (51) is needed to win.
https://www.270towin.com/content/electoral-college-ties/

I am assuming it would have been the 2020 House and Senate that voted, which would have likely given us a President Trump and a VP Harris.......
 
The other counties weren't under a disaster emergency.

"Wolf justified his decision saying the six counties are part of a disaster emergency declaration that he signed on Saturday in response to the civil unrest over the death of George Floyd, an unarmed 46-year-old black man who died in the custody of a Minneapolis police officer. He said the volume of applications in these six counties caused by the COVID-19 crisis combined with the civil disturbance make it necessary to extend the deadline for receiving ballots."

https://www.pennlive.com/news/2020/...ng-mail-in-ballot-deadline-in-6-counties.html

HAHAHA. So he rewrote the election laws because some black serial felon in minnesota died??
 
Hahaha. That's as good a theory as anything the RWs ever dreamed up. :good4u:

IDK, this one is right up there.

June 15 2021
Emails reveal Trump’s chief of staff shared conspiracy theory that Italian satellites stole election.

Known online as #ItalyGate, the conspiracy theory alleged that an employee of an Italian defense, security, and aerospace company openly admitted to switching votes from Trump to then-candidate Joe Biden using satellites.
 
so 52 votes from the same address doesn't look suspicious to you?......

I'm still waiting for someone to post some evidence that this actually happened.

What is suspicious to me is the fact this nebulous claim from the partisan Right Wing site Gateway Pundit has been made over and over and NO ONE at JPP has provided any proof it actually happened.
 
so 52 votes from the same address doesn't look suspicious to you?......

The failure to provide evidence of that happening looks suspicious to me.

Does it look suspicious to you that over 30,000 ballot envelopes had the return address of the Az Republican party headquarters? (You will notice I have as much evidence of that as you have of 52 people voting from the same address.)
 
The failure to provide evidence of that happening looks suspicious to me.

Does it look suspicious to you that over 30,000 ballot envelopes had the return address of the Az Republican party headquarters? (You will notice I have as much evidence of that as you have of 52 people voting from the same address.)

you do?......I don't see that in the OP......
 
christiefan could, if they weren't intellectually lazy.

The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) was set up by Poynter, a leftist "journalism nonprofit", and in 2019, was almost entirely funded by eBay founder Pierre Omidyar—a major DEMOCRAT donor—as well as Google LLC and billionaire George Soros.

Who gets certified and who doesn’t is decided by the IFCN’s advisory board.

One member is Glenn Kessler, former foreign policy reporter and now the head of the "fact-checking" feature at The Washington Post.

Kessler and his team recently published a book called “Donald Trump and His Assault on Truth.” How impartial is that?

The other American is Angie Drobnic Holan, editor-in-chief at left-leaning PolitiFact, which is owned by Poynter. Holan characterizes the other board members as “very knowledgeable about U.S. politics and fact-checking practices.”

Its largest financial sponsor is major DEMOCRAT donor Pierre Omidyar’s Democracy Fund.

“Thousands of statements labeled as untrue or misleading are more properly considered the habitual verbal excess for a man known for his immoderate form of communication,” commented Mark Hemingway, senior writer at RealClearInvestigations.

“Further, a great many of the objections to conservative statements amount to argumentative quibbles that aren’t really ‘fact checks.’”

On Sept. 18, the IFCN announced a collaboration project of 10 fact-checkers and the two largest Spanish-language American broadcasters, Univision and Telemundo, “to fight mis/disinformation” and “expose the record 32 million Latino voters in the U.S. to accurate election-related information from Sept. 15, 2020 through Inauguration Day in 2021.”

The sponsor of the effort is WhatsApp, which is owned by Facebook.

Facebook positioned itself as a major and unprecedented influence in the lead-up to the 2020 presidential election after its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, announced new election-related content rules, a $300 million donation to local DEMOCRAT campaigns, and a drive to "help" 4 million people register and vote.






https://www.theepochtimes.com/faceb...-funding-personnel-organizations_3508014.html
 
Lenny's back for more spanking.

nOFsHCP.gif
 
These audits are going on everywhere in america and are finding proof of massive vote fraud and still the TV networks censor the story!!!

If it is even true that 52 ballots came from a single home- THAT IS PROOF RIGHT THERE THAT THE SYSTEM WORKED AND THEY WERE EXPOSED.

AND EVEN IF IT DID HAPPEN- 52 votes would not have changed the outcome!

NOTHING TO SEE HERE FOLKS!

NEXT STUPID CRYBABY THREAD PLEASE!
 
Remember what Hillary asked about Benghazi? "What difference does it make?" She meant it's over; it's old news; why rehash it now? Nothing will change. Of course, that was convenient for her and Obama.

DEMOCRATS seem to be asking the same thing about the 2020 election. What difference does it make, they want to know. The election is certified, and you have no proof because we won't allow any to be examined, they howl. Biden is the president, they aver. Nothing will change, they assure us. You're wasting your time, they say.

Again, that's pretty convenient.

Forensic audits would uncover the truth.

Why are they so opposed?
 
The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) was set up by Poynter, a leftist "journalism nonprofit", and in 2019, was almost entirely funded by eBay founder Pierre Omidyar—a major DEMOCRAT donor—as well as Google LLC and billionaire George Soros.

Who gets certified and who doesn’t is decided by the IFCN’s advisory board.

One member is Glenn Kessler, former foreign policy reporter and now the head of the "fact-checking" feature at The Washington Post.

Kessler and his team recently published a book called “Donald Trump and His Assault on Truth.” How impartial is that?

The other American is Angie Drobnic Holan, editor-in-chief at left-leaning PolitiFact, which is owned by Poynter. Holan characterizes the other board members as “very knowledgeable about U.S. politics and fact-checking practices.”

Its largest financial sponsor is major DEMOCRAT donor Pierre Omidyar’s Democracy Fund.

“Thousands of statements labeled as untrue or misleading are more properly considered the habitual verbal excess for a man known for his immoderate form of communication,” commented Mark Hemingway, senior writer at RealClearInvestigations.

“Further, a great many of the objections to conservative statements amount to argumentative quibbles that aren’t really ‘fact checks.’”

On Sept. 18, the IFCN announced a collaboration project of 10 fact-checkers and the two largest Spanish-language American broadcasters, Univision and Telemundo, “to fight mis/disinformation” and “expose the record 32 million Latino voters in the U.S. to accurate election-related information from Sept. 15, 2020 through Inauguration Day in 2021.”

The sponsor of the effort is WhatsApp, which is owned by Facebook.

Facebook positioned itself as a major and unprecedented influence in the lead-up to the 2020 presidential election after its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, announced new election-related content rules, a $300 million donation to local DEMOCRAT campaigns, and a drive to "help" 4 million people register and vote.






https://www.theepochtimes.com/faceb...-funding-personnel-organizations_3508014.html

Zuckerberg somehow hired and paid a significant percentage of election workers in 2020.

I knew a Kessler, I liked that dude.

That was a man that didn't bullshit and had no frills or schemes. Yeah, they don't make them like that much anymore.
 
Back
Top