Wait till next week when the vaccine receives full FRA approval.
And they have a huge market.
The vaccinated are the same danger to OTHERS as the unvaccinated. They carry the same amount of virus and spread it in the same manner. And since the symptoms may be lessened, they can have it and spread it without knowing they are infected.No. Not the same rate. One fifth of the rate. Vaccines protect against hospitalization AND infection. You are five times more likely to become infected if you are unvaccinated. And the unvaccinated are far more likely to wear a mask. So no that is not ridiculous. It is completely logical. This disease is spreading because people are not getting vaccinated. Period. The unvaccinated need to be segregated as much as possible m.
A lot of idiots have here have short memories and blind faith.
Leopards do not change their spots.lookie here, democrats are returning to their old roots of segregation and discrimination
The vaccinated are the same danger to OTHERS as the unvaccinated. They carry the same amount of virus and spread it in the same manner. And since the symptoms may be lessened, they can have it and spread it without knowing they are infected.
The hospital admissions here are beginning to wane already. You realize this will stop eventually right? And there are people who cannot take the vaccine, and you advocate punishing them for not taking this experimental drug.
This is totalitarian thinking and you don't even realize it. I am very thankful this is America.
Yes, they carry the same amount of the virus. But THERE ARE FIVE TIMES FEWER OF THEM. Good grief.
This message is hidden because memorygal is on your ignore list.
Don't bother. You are beneath me.
There is no proof of exactly how many asymptomatic vaccinated carriers there are because if they have no symptoms, guess what? They don't get tested.Yes, they carry the same amount of the virus. But THERE ARE FIVE TIMES FEWER OF THEM. Good grief.
No. The FDA doesn't know the long term adverse effects are anymore than you or I do. That's because there is zero data on the long term. To approve something based on such scant data will only cheaper the reputation of the FDA and make them appear untrustworthy.Will you drop the 'experimental' tomorrow? Or are you still going to go with that argument as well? There are very few people who can't take the vaccine. That's a total red herring.
There is no proof of exactly how many asymptomatic vaccinated carriers there are because if they have no symptoms, guess what? They don't get tested.
No. The FDA doesn't know the long term adverse effects are anymore than you or I do. That's because there is zero data on the long term. To approve something based on such scant data will only cheaper the reputation of the FDA and make them appear untrustworthy.
Where's data on long term adverse effects?False. There have been many studies that have demonstrated the efficacy of the vaccines in preventing infection. The actual evidence also exists. If you choose to simply deny fully established facts there is no hope for you.
for sure. good adviceGet the N95s. I don't think the other ones work either.
Where's data on long term adverse effects?
THERE ARE NONE.
Longer than a few months. I'm surprised you so easily gamble with your health and life with an experimental vaccine. And I damn well won't gamble with mine to please anyone.How long term would you like? Don't want to take the chicken pox vaccination yet? LOL at you. You are an anti-vaxxer. You were right, leopards don't change their spots.