Trump considering giving Iran Billions….

Jarod said:
No, Its just an idea being floated by the White House. Interested in your thoughts about if it happens.

I can only guess that if The PP does it, you will be fine with it.
Click to expand...
No im just tired of you whining about all the things that might happen
 
QP! said:
While Iran blocked the Strait to the rest of the world the US had granted Iran a waiver to continue selling to China, India, etc and make huge money as the price of oil was so much higher. So that was stage 1 of Trump PAYING IRAN to try and get a deal and now Trump is negotiating to give them Stage 2, which is the Mother Load payment.


India Pays in Yuan for Iranian Oil Purchases Under U.S. Waiver​

Iran continues exporting millions of barrels of oil as around 90 ships cross the Strait of Hormuz despite the war​

Click to expand...
So your answer is No
 
Yakuda said:
So your answer is No
Click to expand...
Only a magat acts like the source of money given to Iran matters and Obama just gave the 'wrong source'.

You are now arguing 'enriching Iran with Oil money while the rest of the world suffers and is blocked is ok' as long as Iran does not get 'frozen money'. New Money = GOOD to Yakuda, but frozen money equals bad.

That is just 'COPE' and if answered Jarod's question honestly you would say 'I cannot answer that as i do not know what Trump will do yet and my answer will change to ensure i can support it either way'.
 
QP! said:
Only a magat acts like the source of money given to Iran matters and Obama just gave the 'wrong source'.

You are now arguing 'enriching Iran with Oil money while the rest of the world suffers and is blocked is ok' as long as Iran does not get 'frozen money'. New Money = GOOD to Yakuda, but frozen money equals bad.

That is just 'COPE' and if answered Jarod's question honestly you would say 'I cannot answer that as i do not know what Trump will do yet and my answer will change to ensure i can support it either way'.
Click to expand...
So still No. No unfrozen funds. Thanks
 
Yakuda said:
So still No. No unfrozen funds. Thanks
Click to expand...
Yakuda - "I do not care how much money Trump directs to Iran and what method he uses. he can use any and all of them as long as he does not use 'frozen funds' as that is what Obama did and I am against him and that. So if Trump gives Iran 10 times more that are not 'frozen funds', I, Yakuda will clap like a seal'. 'Oh and if Trump does unfreeze the funds you can check back here as i will say 'i don't care' about that either'.

I am MAGAT Hear me roar!
 
QP! said:
Yakuda - "I do not care how much money Trump directs to Iran and what method he uses. he can use any and all of them as long as he does not use 'frozen funds' as that is what Obama did and I am against him and that. So if Trump gives Iran 10 times more that are not 'frozen funds', I, Yakuda will clap like a seal'. 'Oh and if Trump does unfreeze the funds you can check back here as i will say 'i don't care' about that either'.

I am MAGAT Hear me roar!
Click to expand...
Still No I see
 
Crepitus said:
You said it.



How does it feel to be right for once?
Click to expand...
it is fun seeing magats spin themselves in to lies in the way @Yakuda is doing now.

He has convinced themselves that magats would not have cared if Obama got Iran even more money as long as it was not with 'frozen funds'. He is telling himself 'sources of new funds = good to do, but allowing Iran their own frozen funds = bad to do', this despite the FACT that if you get 'new funds' you still maintain your claim on your 'frozen funds' and thus to you the 'new funds' are actually better.

But Yakuda is lying and telling himself Obama giving new funds would have been fine and the only issue is the release of 'frozen funds' and as long as Trump does not release those, that is a win, even if Trump puts together 10 different ways to give Iran multiples more funds.

That is TDS to the extreme and fun to watch.
 
QP! said:
it is fun seeing magats spin themselves in to lies in the way @Yakuda is doing now.

He has convinced themselves that magats would not have cared if Obama got Iran even more money as long as it was not with 'frozen funds'. He is telling himself 'sources of new funds = good to do, but allowing Iran their own frozen funds = bad to do', this despite the FACT that if you get 'new funds' you still maintain your claim on your 'frozen funds' and thus to you the 'new funds' are actually better.

But Yakuda is lying and telling himself Obama giving new funds would have been fine and the only issue is the release of 'frozen funds' and as long as Trump does not release those, that is a win, even if Trump puts together 10 different ways to give Iran multiples more funds.

That is TDS to the extreme and fun to watch.
Click to expand...
true. Doofus up there says this is different because the funds are in Iraq. They're still funds frozen by the US, and they will still be released by the US.

The fact it's ten times the money seems to be moot, lol.

When tRump releases the funds I'm gonna run around the forum screaming "pallets of cash!!" just like they did just to be an asshole, lol.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: QP!
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top