Covid Jab Follies: The more you know.

Right, so there's absolutely no connection between COVID variants / strains and the midterms.

Right, the Wuhan Designer Virus® was unleashed on America to corrupt a presidential election in 2020, not affect midterms.

But democrats figure that since gerrymandering has failed them - they should once again engage in biological warfare against the American people.
 
Right, the Wuhan Designer Virus® was unleashed on America to corrupt a presidential election in 2020, not affect midterms.
You spelled "the world" wrong.
But democrats figure that since gerrymandering has failed them - they should once again engage in biological warfare against the American people.
Which Democrats are orchestrating and executing this biological warfare?
 

Claim 1:​

“The weapon was unleashed in Hong Kong first, to quell the uprising against the CCP. Then it was shipped directly to Seattle, WA.”
Verdict: Completely false.

  • There is no credible evidence that COVID‑19 was a bioweapon deliberately “unleashed” in Hong Kong or “shipped” to Seattle.
  • The origin of SARS‑CoV‑2 is still not definitively proven, but the weight of scientific evidence points to a zoonotic (animal-to-human) origin, likely linked to wildlife trade and markets in Wuhan, not Hong Kong.
  • The “Hong Kong → Seattle bioweapon pipeline” is pure conspiracy fiction, not supported by any reputable scientific body, investigation, or intelligence consensus.

Claim 2:​

“Anthony Fauci… orchestrating and executing this biological warfare.”
Verdict: False and defamatory.

  • There is no evidence that Anthony Fauci “orchestrated” or “executed” biological warfare.
  • Conspiracy claims that Fauci “created” or “funded the creation” of COVID‑19 have been repeatedly debunked or rated unproven by fact‑checking organizations.
  • Even debates about lab leak vs. natural origin do not support the leap to “Fauci ran a bioweapon op.” That’s rhetoric, not evidence.
 
The weapon was unleashed in Hong Kong first, to quell the uprising against the CCP.
The COVID lockdowns actually cause and uprising and protests.
Then it was shipped (literally) directly to Seattle, WA.
How was it "shipped'?
Anthony Fauci, to start with.
So, Anthony Fauci, because Democrats may not be as successful as desired with redistricting, somehow infected multiple bird watchers in Argentina to not cause a Hantavirus pandemic in the US?
 
More lies from you, not surprised


FACT CHECK: “COVID was shipped”

Claim:

COVID‑19 was “shipped” to the U.S. or elsewhere as part of a deliberate operation.

Verdict:

No credible evidence supports this. The Diamond Princess case — the article you linked — actually shows the opposite: COVID spread through normal person‑to‑person transmission in a confined environment, not through shipping or intentional transport.


1. What the Diamond Princess case actually shows

The Boston University Hospitality Review article describes:

  • A cruise ship departing Yokohama in January 2020
  • A passenger who had been in Hong Kong testing positive
  • Rapid onboard spread due to shared air, close quarters, and poor containment
Nothing in the article suggests:

  • intentional transport
  • bioweapon activity
  • “shipping” the virus to any country
It is a case study in accidental spread, not deliberate movement.


2. Why cruise‑ship outbreaks happened

Cruise ships are ideal environments for respiratory virus spread:

  • enclosed spaces
  • shared ventilation
  • high-density living
  • long exposure times
This is why multiple ships had outbreaks early in 2020 — not because they were “shipping COVID,” but because they were floating petri dishes.


3. What the scientific consensus says

Authoritative sources (CDC, WHO, peer‑reviewed studies):

  • COVID‑19 spread globally through travelers, not shipments.
  • Early spread was driven by air travel, tourism, and community transmission, not cargo or deliberate transport.
  • Cruise ships were among the first superspreader environments.

4. Why “shipped” is a biased framing

The phrase “shipped” implies:

  • intentionality
  • coordination
  • malicious transport
None of which is supported by evidence.

The Diamond Princess article is being misused to imply a conspiracy it does not describe.


5. Bias check

The original claim uses:

  • Loaded language (“shipped”)
  • Implied intent without evidence
  • Cherry‑picking (using a cruise‑ship outbreak to imply global conspiracy)
  • False causation (outbreak on a ship ≠ virus being shipped)
This is a classic misinterpretation pattern: taking a real event and stapling a false motive onto it.
 
Back
Top