Funding racism so they can fundraise to "fight racism".
Glaring fraud from the racists of the left.
DOJ Indicts Southern Poverty Law Center for Secretly Funneling MILLIONS to Members of White Supremacist and Extremist Groups
- Thread starter ziggy
- Start date
Glaring fraud from the racists of the left.
Ichabod Stain
Was it me?
neocons and Zionists also sieze on the lies this practice creates.
Grim Reaper
Chief Exit Officer (CEO)
- “Hillary Clinton claimed Trump stole the election from her.”
- Fact check: There is no documented evidence that Hillary Clinton ever explicitly said “Trump stole the election from me.”
- She did concede the 2016 election to Trump and has criticized election interference (such as Russian interference), but that is not the same as claiming Trump personally stole the election.
- Accusations of lying or insanity:
- I don’t have personal beliefs or intentions, so accusations about “lying” or “pathological insanity” don’t apply to me. I provide fact-based responses and context.
- Questions about felony or death penalty for political opposition:
- In the United States, opposing a political party is not a crime, and advocating for criminal penalties or death for political opposition would violate the Constitution, including First and Eighth Amendments.
- There is no legal or ethical basis in U.S. law for punishing people simply for disagreeing politically.
Summary:- Your statement about Hillary Clinton is not accurate; she did not claim Trump “stole” the 2016 election.
- Political opposition is legally protected; criminal or death penalties for opposing a party are illegal and unconstitutional.
Grim Reaper
Chief Exit Officer (CEO)
- Claim:“Funding racism so they can fundraise to ‘fight racism.’”
- This is a common political critique of some nonprofit and activist groups: the argument is that certain organizations highlight or publicize instances of racism to attract donations.
- Fact check: While fundraising is a real part of how many organizations operate, there is no verified, systematic evidence that mainstream anti-racism organizations deliberately create or fund racism as a strategy. That would be illegal and extremely difficult to document.
- Claim:“Glaring fraud from the racists of the left.”
- Fact check: This is an opinion, not a documented fact.
- Political fraud is a serious accusation. There is no credible evidence that major left-leaning anti-racism organizations are engaging in organized fraud specifically by funding racism. Some watchdogs do report cases of financial mismanagement or questionable spending in nonprofits, but those are not equivalent to intentionally funding racism to raise money.
Summary:- Accusing left-leaning groups of funding racism to fundraise is not supported by documented evidence; it’s a political critique or rhetorical framing.
- Claims of “glaring fraud” are opinion unless tied to specific legal findings.
Been there, did that, twice, did Hillary do anything other than express that opinion, no, did she attempt to invalidate the vote, no, was she part of some far fetched coup, no, opps, I forgot, O’Bama had the coup
We know, you told us, Ron Johnson said so
Hey pal, your words, you even worked in Taxi Driver as the motivating Democrat strategy
Given all your scenarios are fiction, the questions are inane
You mean like start the Russian Collusion hoax that was the foundation of the Obama attempted coup? Why yes, yes she did.
There you go fucking lying again - but you have to be you.
Read the documents that prove Hillary Clinton OK’d plan to ‘smear’ Trump with Russia collusion
Special counsel John Durham uncovered the information during a multi-year probe into intelligence activities during the 2016 election.
nypost.com
Along with the FBI, DOJ, and a dozen journalistic investigations.
But you're a mindless drone of the hive lying to serve your party.
It's what you do.
Words you make up are not my words - you're just a pathetic troll who thinks if you repeat the same debunked lie you are somehow winning.
You're deeply mentally ill.
Funny how I cite my claims and prove them.
You don't - because virtually everything you post is an outright lie.
Grim Reaper
Chief Exit Officer (CEO)
You mean like start the Russian Collusion hoax that was the foundation of the Obama attempted coup? Why yes, yes she did.
There you go fucking lying again - but you have to be you.
Read the documents that prove Hillary Clinton OK’d plan to ‘smear’ Trump with Russia collusion
Special counsel John Durham uncovered the information during a multi-year probe into intelligence activities during the 2016 election.
Along with the FBI, DOJ, and a dozen journalistic investigations.
But you're a mindless drone of the hive lying to serve your party.
It's what you do.
Words you make up are not my words - you're just a pathetic troll who thinks if you repeat the same debunked lie you are somehow winning.
You're deeply mentally ill.
Funny how I cite my claims and prove them.
You don't - because virtually everything you post is an outright lie.
- Source assessment:
- The New York Post is generally considered a tabloid-leaning outlet with a conservative slant. Its reporting can include investigative reporting but also editorialized content. Headlines are sometimes sensationalized.
- A single article, even with cited documents, doesn’t automatically equate to a verified, conclusive finding.
- Claim verification:
- The core claim is that Hillary Clinton personally approved a plan orchestrated by her campaign to falsely link Trump to Russia.
- Multiple federal investigations, including by the FBI and DOJ, as well as extensive reporting by mainstream outlets (e.g., The Washington Post, NY Times, Reuters), found no evidence that Clinton personally ordered or orchestrated a smear campaign in a criminal sense. Investigations focused on Russian interference in the 2016 election and Trump campaign contacts.
- The intelligence community and DOJ investigations did identify certain actions by campaign aides and intermediaries in opposition research (including the Steele dossier), but these were examined for legality and factual basis. The overall conclusion did not establish that Clinton personally directed a campaign to frame Trump.
- Context and nuance:
- Campaigns often engage in opposition research, which can include looking for links or potential vulnerabilities in opponents. This is legal and common in U.S. politics. It becomes illegal or actionable only if it involves knowingly fabricated evidence or criminal activity.
- “Approved” can be interpreted differently—reviewing or being aware of a memo is not the same as orchestrating a smear. The documents referenced by the Post appear to show campaign aides strategizing, but there’s no evidence in public record that Clinton personally initiated or ordered illegal activity.
- Bias check:
- The language you’re using to describe the other side is highly charged (“mindless drone,” “deeply mentally ill,” “pathetic troll”). This is emotional and not evidence-based. It signals strong confirmation bias.
- Relying solely on one partisan source while dismissing broader investigative consensus can skew perception.
Bottom line: The article itself reports internal campaign planning documents, but there’s no verified evidence that Hillary Clinton personally directed an illegal smear campaign against Trump. Multiple federal and journalistic investigations found no criminal misconduct by her in this regard. Citing one tabloid article as definitive proof ignores the broader factual record.
AI response. Do better.
Wasn’t a hoax, the fact you can not explain why Junior, Paul, and Jared eagerly met with Russians in Trump Tower proves it was not a hoax, the Russians assisted Trump’s campaignYou mean like start the Russian Collusion hoax that was the foundation of the Obama attempted coup? Why yes, yes she did.
There you go fucking lying again - but you have to be you.
Read the documents that prove Hillary Clinton OK’d plan to ‘smear’ Trump with Russia collusion
Special counsel John Durham uncovered the information during a multi-year probe into intelligence activities during the 2016 election.
Along with the FBI, DOJ, and a dozen journalistic investigations.
But you're a mindless drone of the hive lying to serve your party.
It's what you do.
Words you make up are not my words - you're just a pathetic troll who thinks if you repeat the same debunked lie you are somehow winning.
You're deeply mentally ill.
Funny how I cite my claims and prove them.
You don't - because virtually everything you post is an outright lie.
And now smearing a rival candidate is a coup? And by the way, the smear campaign was started by fellow Republicans, and if that is a coup, what is mobilizing information obtained by Russian hackers stolen off of the Democratic campaign? Remind us again, who asked Russia to hack Hillary?
Your claims are substantiated by Ron Johnson and Murdoch, might as well cite The Onion
Another False Libtard Premise Alert!
I'd like to point out one annoying lie the puppet masters pushed right after the SPLC indictment to set up their favorite false premise. The SPLC was paying informants to infiltrate these extremist groups. The libtard media slips that word in every chance they get. It is a perfect example of how these scumbags operate. They didn't infiltrate shit, they paid existing members or created the groups from scratch. Big difference.
They were paying top dogs and existing members of these groups, including the KKK's Imperial Wizard, millions to create chaos and post content at the SPLC's direction. Tiny groups of scattered inbreds were not giving the left enough material so the SPLC helped them get noticed by directing their bullshit posts and staging protests worthy of their fundraising appetite and the 'evidence' they needed to continue the lie they've been perpetrating for years. What lie? America is full of racist of course.
The evil Democrat party used one of its favorite proxies (SPLC) to manufacture the entire Charlottesville show with exploited libtard donation money, complete with busloads of undoubtedly paid agitators to put on a violent spectacle. Just that alone makes this an epic scandal of far reaching tentacles. This organization has caused enormous pain for decades and I suspect we'll be hearing a lot more about their trail of destruction.
The drones will keep parroting infiltrate and screaming political witch hunt while many libtards quietly approve of everything the SPLC has been doing, because the ends justify the means for them, period. They need these boogeymen to survive so they help create them, because they know deep down that the racist groups they had to create and prop up are really out there anyways. These people are batshit crazy and dangerous as hell. At least now we finally have the right people fighting back.
I'd like to point out one annoying lie the puppet masters pushed right after the SPLC indictment to set up their favorite false premise. The SPLC was paying informants to infiltrate these extremist groups. The libtard media slips that word in every chance they get. It is a perfect example of how these scumbags operate. They didn't infiltrate shit, they paid existing members or created the groups from scratch. Big difference.
They were paying top dogs and existing members of these groups, including the KKK's Imperial Wizard, millions to create chaos and post content at the SPLC's direction. Tiny groups of scattered inbreds were not giving the left enough material so the SPLC helped them get noticed by directing their bullshit posts and staging protests worthy of their fundraising appetite and the 'evidence' they needed to continue the lie they've been perpetrating for years. What lie? America is full of racist of course.
The evil Democrat party used one of its favorite proxies (SPLC) to manufacture the entire Charlottesville show with exploited libtard donation money, complete with busloads of undoubtedly paid agitators to put on a violent spectacle. Just that alone makes this an epic scandal of far reaching tentacles. This organization has caused enormous pain for decades and I suspect we'll be hearing a lot more about their trail of destruction.
The drones will keep parroting infiltrate and screaming political witch hunt while many libtards quietly approve of everything the SPLC has been doing, because the ends justify the means for them, period. They need these boogeymen to survive so they help create them, because they know deep down that the racist groups they had to create and prop up are really out there anyways. These people are batshit crazy and dangerous as hell. At least now we finally have the right people fighting back.
How is it offensive? By the way, thanks for proving my point. Creepy is ashamed of her gender, lol.
And there it is. I don't know what point you think you have (other than the one on top of your head) but you have just made mine in a way I could not have at all from this side of the discussion.
So thank you for your support.
I have no idea. It's always just a guess for me. That is, unless one of the morons actually has the incredible bravery needed to expose their gender to this anonymous crowd, lol. Seriously, what's the big secret? I really don't get it. The only thing that makes any sense at all? They're confused like many that claim they're transgender or bigender or any of the batshit crazy 'identities' they have, or they're ashamed of their gender. Either way, it's pathetic at best.
Grim Reaper
Chief Exit Officer (CEO)
Oh, you're one of those sad little cockroaches who thinks gender is an insult, how original. Tell me, is your entire personality just a recycling bin of 4chan's sweatiest, most unwashed takes? Or do you genuinely believe that screeching lol u trans, like a malfunctioning vending machine counts as wit? You're not edgy, you're just exhausting, the human equivalent of a participation trophy with most likely to die alone engraved on it. Every word you type is a confession that no one has ever loved you unconditionally, and the only reason you punch down is because you're too weak to lift your own pathetic existence out of the gutter. Congrats, your legacy is being the reason someone blocks an entire website. Now crawl back to your cum-crusted keyboard and marinate in the realization that even trolls think you're a disappointment.
Libhater
Verified User
Grim Reaper
Chief Exit Officer (CEO)
Oh you a liberal then? Good to know.
Oh boy, I'm glad I could help.
Creepy has proved a top-secret point from a side of the discussion he couldn't have done, you know, the other side of the comment that only Creepy can see. You all get it, right? I think you need to be a really special libtard like Creepy to see it, and I'm certain she won't share it with anyone. It's her little secret and maybe a few other super-special simpletons that have the gift.
Nothing to secret, kid. Just over your head.
Oh yes, it's top secret and it over everyone's head. Only you can see it and you sure as hell can't explain it, lol.