Airstrip One
Completely Effed
still waiting for that little ice age genius? lol
The 1970s are calling:
still waiting for that little ice age genius? lol
while you make absurd claims and then run away when asked to back them up... you are no better than he is.
Houstonians have been directly affected by climate change in that the intensity of hurricanes and torrential rains that have hit Houston in recent years, causing not only a 100 year flood, but a 500 year flood, by the devaluation of their homes for being in a flood plain. It has also increased their insurance, and required flood insurance if they carry a mortgage.
So you can't describe the difference, eh? That means you can't describe a change.Thanks for proving that you are an idiot on this topic.
That IS what I said. The point is that climate is not a quantifiable value, and there is no way to describe a 'change'.'mathematical difference'??? LMAO.
So?You do understand that the Earth has not always been as it is today?
So? Not climate.That tectonic shifts can alter the landscape?
So? Not climate. Temperature is not climate.That sun activity can alter the temperature around the globe?
So? Not climate.That magnetic north has shifted constantly,
Climate doesn't change...ever.suggesting forces deep within the earth affecting our climate?
No paradox. You simply can't describe a change.The stupidity of your demands shows that you lack any fundamental ability for rational thought.
You seem to think you can describe a change in climate. Still waiting.Quite possibly one of the dumbest comments on this board... EVER. Which is saying a LOT given that we have Garud, Desh and Cypress spouting moronic comments daily.
Where have you been ? He ( Sock 1) has been denying the existence of paleoclimatology, global weather and even global weather stations for weeks. He's just a troll spitting common-or-garden Denier canards. He's stupid enough to earn his own gif.
Into the Night Soil;
fgm7.15; ( Sock #2 )
![]()
Define 'climate change'. What is the global weather right now? Where is there a single weather station measuring the temperature of the Earth?
Lie.I don't make absurd claims at all.
I report on observable climatic anomalies which contribute to the global consensus of impending climatic disaster. RUN, asshole- because you're in the way of the wave.
liberals are enemies of science. They make adjustments to record and forever destroy the clarity of our scientific understanding. They claim some urgent cause that they blatantly manufacture and they act like a religious cult.
liberals are enemies of science. They make adjustments to record and forever destroy the clarity of our scientific understanding. They claim some urgent cause that they blatantly manufacture and they act like a religious cult.
who's adjusting what records pilgrim?
So you can't describe the difference, eh? That means you can't describe a change.
That IS what I said. The point is that climate is not a quantifiable value, and there is no way to describe a 'change'.
So?
So? Not climate.
So? Not climate. Temperature is not climate.
So? Not climate.
Climate doesn't change...ever.
No paradox. You simply can't describe a change.
You seem to think you can describe a change in climate. Still waiting.
Define 'climate change'. What is the global weather right now? Where is there a single weather station measuring the temperature of the Earth?
who's adjusting what records pilgrim?
anonymoose said:What's your solution?
Because you can define the problem. Define 'climate change'.I do not have one.
But you DO invent, contrive, and bullshit your way into claiming there is a problem.I am not one of those obscure message board arm chair experts who feels my ego is at risk if I do not invent, contrive, and bullshit my way into an answer.
Sort what out? Define 'climate change'.I leave it to the trained experts to sort out, in the same way I leave brain surgery to neurosurgeons.
Define 'climate change'.My limited layperson understanding suggests that we need a mix of
adaptation (modifying our infrastructure and public works to be resilient in the face of climate change),
No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.and mitigation (reducing GHG emissions and increasing GHG sinks).
What do you mean, "an experiment"?
Like Bill Nye did for mouth-breathers? Here's the link: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/videos/category/science/climate-change-101-with-bill-nye-the-science/
Now it's four minutes long, which might be too long for your attention span, but Nye uses a lot of colors so you should be able to focus.
Of course the climate changed before man...no one is denying that.
What you're denying is that man can change the climate, and you're denying that simply because admitting you were wrong would end up having a cascading effect on everything else you believe, ultimately coming down to questioning of your personal judgment and instincts. So basically, since you're so wrong about man's affect on climate, wouldn't that mean that poor judgment steered you wrong in other places? Like taxes, defense, guns, etc.?
If you were so wrong about something so simple and obvious, that casts doubt on your judgment when it comes to other things.