Haven't looked up yet, have you, lazy ass? It's easy to tell.
Get back to me when you have educated yourself.
Evidence suggests a massive scandal is brewing at the FBI
- Thread starter dukkha
- Start date
Haven't looked up yet, have you, lazy ass? It's easy to tell.
Get back to me when you have educated yourself.
Ruh roh. There's the stalker again.
Another one demonstrating (still) his massive ignorance.
Really, can any of you cretins read?
Superfreak
Verified User
Again moron, i know precisely what it means. You clearly do not. Which is why you refuse to answer the question... WHAT was obstructed?
Are you going to continue running in fear little boy?
I think there's at lease two FBI Directors that Donald asked to Obstruct ...
This will be the easy part ... just playing back Donald's own TV Interviews and Tweets
When you ask that question, you continue to demonstrate your ignorance of the word.
Keep floundering. I'll school you soon. After you humiliate yourself a few more times.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Cite. And again, what was obstructed?
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Try an investigation. That's what Trump attempted to obstruct.
Superfreak
Verified User
An individual at the FBI being terminated does nothing to obstruct an ongoing investigation by the FBI on the whole. He would have to actively seek to stop the investigation completely or interfere with it. Given Comey's negligence in how he handled the Clinton email situation, he should have been fired and more competent people appointed to run the investigation into collusion.
Again... what was obstructed?
Superfreak
Verified User
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstruction_of_justice
"Generally, obstruction charges are laid when it is discovered that a person questioned in an investigation, other than a suspect, has lied to the investigating officers. However, in most common law jurisdictions, the right to remain silent can be used to allow any person questioned by police merely to deny answering questions posed by an investigator without giving any reason for doing so. (In such a case, the investigators may subpoena the witness to give testimony under oath in court, though the witness may then exercise their rights, for example in the Fifth Amendment, if they believe their answer may serve to incriminate themselves.) If the person willfully and knowingly tried to protect a suspect (such as by providing a false alibi) or to hide from investigation of their own activities (such as to hide their involvement in another crime), this may leave them liable to prosecution. Obstruction charges can also be laid if a person alters, destroys, or conceals physical evidence.[1] Obstruction charges may also be laid in unique situations such as refusal to aid a police officer, escape through voluntary action of an officer and refusing to assist prison officers in arresting escaped convicts.
Obstruction can include crimes committed by judges, prosecutors, attorneys general, and elected officials in general. It is misfeasance, malfeasance or nonfeasance in the conduct of the office. Most commonly it is prosecuted as a crime for perjury by a non governmental official primarily because of prosecutorial discretion."
No... he does not understand it any better than you do. You both are ignorant as to what it means.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Evidence suggests that you Trumptards are complete fucking morons.
The 'Secret Society' is coming after Trump.
WOWUn-fucking-believable ;0)
Superfreak
Verified User
Again... no he did not. That is complete nonsense. What are you claiming he did to 'attempt to obstruct'???
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
So he didn't obstruct anything. At least one of you finally admit it.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Don't get it twisted. I make no attempt to convince a Trump Supporter of ANYTHING. I'm simply pointing out the facts as determined by people who like facts.
If you really question whether an obstruction case can be made .. 'trump case for obstruction' .. google it.
Superfreak
Verified User
I do not support trump. But I am calling bullshit on this bogus investigation and on the bogus claims he attempted to or did obstruct the investigation. He did neither. That is the FACT of the matter.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
I apologize for calling you a Trump supporter. However, with all due respect, last I checked, you were not the Keeper of Facts. That will be determined by legal minds and an investigation.
If you're suggesting that there is no basis for the investigation, then surely you can see why I thought you were a Trump supporter. No idea how you came to that conclusion otherwise.
Superfreak
Verified User
I did not say that there wasn't a basis for the investigation, but I am saying that they have found no evidence of collusion nor have they found any evidence of obstruction (at least not that has been made public). That said, I do think it is bogus to continue as they should have been able to prove a case by now.
As you can see from this thread, the simpletons cannot even point to what they THINK MIGHT BE OBSTRUCTION. So forgive me for potentially lumping you in with them, because from your post above, you are waiting on the investigation to come to a close before making up your mind.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
How do you know what they've found?
Serious investigations do not investigate through the media.
If Trump and his supporters have nothing to fear .. why do they act as though they do?
We'll go a couple more times to maximize your self-humiliation, then we might proceed with your education.
BINGO! Another person in the know.