Evidence suggests a massive scandal is brewing at the FBI

https://www.ft.com/content/33285dfa-...8-d3778b55a923
Dirty money: Trump and the Kazakh connection
FT probe finds evidence a Trump venture has links to alleged laundering network




https://www.ft.com/content/33285dfa-...8-d3778b55a923
Dirty money: Trump and the Kazakh connection
FT probe finds evidence a Trump venture has links to alleged laundering network



http://www.newsweek.com/trump-drugs-...ndering-714891
Trump Made Millions of Dollars From Drug Money Laundering in Panama: Report
By Cristina Maza On 11/17/17 at 11:17 AM



http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...national-crime
Trump building in Panama tied to Russian mafia, international crime: report
By John Bowden - 11/17/17 08:49 AM EST
 
There will never be a charge of Obstruction.

...

1) The uniqueness of the president’s role creates a whole host of legal, constitutional, and political obstacles here.

2) Trump’s allegedly obstructive conduct doesn’t quite match the two presidential precedents we have here. The obstruction of justice impeachment articles Presidents Nixon and Clinton faced accused them of destroying or withholding evidence and telling witnesses to lie under oath.

3) Finally, Trump’s possible motive is more difficult to prove than many are acknowledging with the evidence we have so far. That’s because he can still make the case that rather than acting to cover up crimes, he acted because he genuinely believes the Russia investigation is “fake news” and that he did nothing wrong.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vo...16868268/trump-obstruction-of-justice-mueller
 
evince said:
https://www.ft.com/content/33285dfa-...8-d3778b55a923
Dirty money: Trump and the Kazakh connection
FT probe finds evidence a Trump venture has links to alleged laundering network




https://www.ft.com/content/33285dfa-...8-d3778b55a923
Dirty money: Trump and the Kazakh connection
FT probe finds evidence a Trump venture has links to alleged laundering network



http://www.newsweek.com/trump-drugs-...ndering-714891
Trump Made Millions of Dollars From Drug Money Laundering in Panama: Report
By Cristina Maza On 11/17/17 at 11:17 AM



http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...national-crime
Trump building in Panama tied to Russian mafia, international crime: report
By John Bowden - 11/17/17 08:49 AM EST
Click to expand...

So all landlords are responsible for their tenants? If you owned a home and rented it and your tenants are involved in illegal activity, does that mean your automatically guilty?
 
evince said:
what landlord are you jabbering on about idiot?
Click to expand...

You really don't know? You mean to tell me you have never heard of tenant's breaking the law and that your simple mind can't comprehend the scenario?

Again, IF YOU owned a house and rented it out, are you automatically responsible for your tenants activities?
 
https://www.ft.com/content/33285dfa-...8-d3778b55a923
Dirty money: Trump and the Kazakh connection
FT probe finds evidence a Trump venture has links to alleged laundering network



http://www.newsweek.com/trump-drugs-...ndering-714891
Trump Made Millions of Dollars From Drug Money Laundering in Panama: Report
By Cristina Maza On 11/17/17 at 11:17 AM



http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...national-crime
Trump building in Panama tied to Russian mafia, international crime: report
By John Bowden - 11/17/17 08:49 AM EST
 
Superfreak said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstruction_of_justice

"Generally, obstruction charges are laid when it is discovered that a person questioned in an investigation, other than a suspect, has lied to the investigating officers. However, in most common law jurisdictions, the right to remain silent can be used to allow any person questioned by police merely to deny answering questions posed by an investigator without giving any reason for doing so. (In such a case, the investigators may subpoena the witness to give testimony under oath in court, though the witness may then exercise their rights, for example in the Fifth Amendment, if they believe their answer may serve to incriminate themselves.) If the person willfully and knowingly tried to protect a suspect (such as by providing a false alibi) or to hide from investigation of their own activities (such as to hide their involvement in another crime), this may leave them liable to prosecution. Obstruction charges can also be laid if a person alters, destroys, or conceals physical evidence.[1] Obstruction charges may also be laid in unique situations such as refusal to aid a police officer, escape through voluntary action of an officer and refusing to assist prison officers in arresting escaped convicts.

Obstruction can include crimes committed by judges, prosecutors, attorneys general, and elected officials in general. It is misfeasance, malfeasance or nonfeasance in the conduct of the office. Most commonly it is prosecuted as a crime for perjury by a non governmental official primarily because of prosecutorial discretion."

No... he does not understand it any better than you do. You both are ignorant as to what it means.
Click to expand...

You've humiliated yourself enough now. Here's your lesson for the day. Have a 10 year old read and explain it to you.

"Obstruction of justice is defined in the omnibus clause of 18 U.S.C. § 1503, which provides that "whoever . . . . corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be (guilty of an offense)." Persons are charged under this statute based on allegations that a defendant intended to interfere with an official proceeding, by doing things such as destroying evidence, or interfering with the duties of jurors or court officers."

Lazy fucktard. It takes about 5 seconds to find that reference.
 
Superfreak said:
An individual at the FBI being terminated does nothing to obstruct an ongoing investigation by the FBI on the whole. He would have to actively seek to stop the investigation completely or interfere with it. Given Comey's negligence in how he handled the Clinton email situation, he should have been fired and more competent people appointed to run the investigation into collusion.

Again... what was obstructed?
Click to expand...
Recall trump has the right to fire Comey
Obstructionism would have to clearly show Trump fired Comey because he refused to go easy on Flynn-
the subject of that conversation - and Trump was DIRECTLY THREATENING Comey he would be fired.

That has to be stated and not implied. IOWS Trump threatens Comey to commit malfeasance to keep his job
 
domer76 said:
You've humiliated yourself enough now. Here's your lesson for the day. Have a 10 year old read and explain it to you.

"Obstruction of justice is defined in the omnibus clause of 18 U.S.C. § 1503, which provides that "whoever . . . . corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be (guilty of an offense)." Persons are charged under this statute based on allegations that a defendant intended to interfere with an official proceeding, by doing things such as destroying evidence, or interfering with the duties of jurors or court officers."

Lazy fucktard. It takes about 5 seconds to find that reference.
Click to expand...

What threats? What was destroyed or what duties of juror or court officers were impeded or influenced.

You see, illiterate shit, you can't cherry pick a statute like you did. It needs to be read in its entirety. When fully read there isn't even a scintilla of evidence he did any of those things.

You are so Dumb, Dumber.
 
Yaya said:
What threats? What was destroyed or what duties of juror or court officers were impeded or influenced.

You see, illiterate shit, you can't cherry pick a statute like you did. It needs to be read in its entirety. When fully read there isn't even a scintilla of evidence he did any of those things.

You are so Dumb, Dumber.
Click to expand...

Illiterate fuck can’t find a 10 year old to read to him. How the fuck do you manage in life? Do you not even understand the meaning of the word “or”?

Damn! I have never seen such a fucking idiot. I even highlighted the pertinent parts for you and you still fuck it up. Pitiable.

Plenty of evidence. He tried to intimidate Comey in their meetings and asked him to let the Flynn investigation go. He told the Russians that he fired Comey because of the investigation and admitted it to Holt in that interview. Now, I see he ordered Mueller to be fired, but backed off when the WH Counsel threatened to wuit.

Your desperation is showing, pal. Try self-medicating.
 
Havana Moon said:
Desh in the flesh!
daf105d5e00b72839e1b91ca5760367b.jpg


Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

remember how pissed she was when Dorothy killed her sister?.....
 
domer76 said:
Illiterate fuck can’t find a 10 year old to read to him. How the fuck do you manage in life? Do you not even understand the meaning of the word “or”?

Damn! I have never seen such a fucking idiot. I even highlighted the pertinent parts for you and you still fuck it up. Pitiable.

Plenty of evidence. He tried to intimidate Comey in their meetings and asked him to let the Flynn investigation go. He told the Russians that he fired Comey because of the investigation and admitted it to Holt in that interview. Now, I see he ordered Mueller to be fired, but backed off when the WH Counsel threatened to wuit.

Your desperation is showing, pal. Try self-medicating.
Click to expand...

You don't know how to read a statute. You conveniently left out the ELEMENTS you dirty Dumb Dumber.

He must commit certain actions for the bolded to be chargeable you effing eternal Dumb Dumber.
 
Yaya said:
What threats? What was destroyed or what duties of juror or court officers were impeded or influenced.

You see, illiterate shit, you can't cherry pick a statute like you did. It needs to be read in its entirety. When fully read there isn't even a scintilla of evidence he did any of those things.

You are so Dumb, Dumber.
Click to expand...
It is hard to decide who is more dopey, Runeatic or Domer?

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
domer76 said:
Illiterate fuck can’t find a 10 year old to read to him. How the fuck do you manage in life? Do you not even understand the meaning of the word “or”?

Damn! I have never seen such a fucking idiot. I even highlighted the pertinent parts for you and you still fuck it up. Pitiable.

Plenty of evidence. He tried to intimidate Comey in their meetings and asked him to let the Flynn investigation go. He told the Russians that he fired Comey because of the investigation and admitted it to Holt in that interview. Now, I see he ordered Mueller to be fired, but backed off when the WH Counsel threatened to wuit.

Your desperation is showing, pal. Try self-medicating.
Click to expand...
Domer always get agitated when cornered, typical rat like behaviour.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top