Evidence suggests a massive scandal is brewing at the FBI

It is hard to decide who is more dopy, Runeatic or Domer?

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

That is a tough one, I'd have to go with Dumber, he truly takes stupid to a new level. Arguing for weeks that solicitation means you accept someone's offer to meet

Even Runetard didn't agree with him.
 
Domer always get agitated when cornered, typical rat like behaviour.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

He literally takes two small sentences or part, and completely ignores the elements or conduct that one must engage in to be indicted. He basically is taking a murder statute and saying see, taking a life.... And proclaiming the murder is guilty of murder when they only killed a rat.

And he runs around calling others illiterate, too funny.
 
What Moron would be stupid enough to believe that if there was some nefarious "secret society" operating within the FBI, that FBI staffers would actually be emailing each other about it?

The answer is: Republicans.

I know that because whenever the question is "who the fuck would be stupid enough ...", the answer is always Republicans.
 
"Judiciary Committee aides told us that the destruction of the laptops is particularly troubling as it means that the computers could not be used as evidence in future legal proceedings, should new information or circumstances arise.

Committee aides also asked why the FBI and DOJ would enter into a voluntary negotiation to begin with, when the laptops could be obtained condition-free via a subpoena.

The letter also asked why the DOJ agreed to limit their search of the laptops to files before Jan. 31, 2015, which would “give up any opportunity to find evidence related to the destruction of evidence or obstruction of justice related to Secretary Clinton’s unauthorized use of a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State.”

Aides expressed shock at the parameter, saying it is especially troubling as Mills and Samuelson already had immunity from the consequences of whatever might be on the laptop.

“You’re essentially extending immunity to everyone,” one aide said.

The letter to Lynch sought to determine how many documents were blocked from FBI investigators because they fell outside of the date range agreed to by the DOJ.

Fox News’ Catherine Herridge"
 
You've humiliated yourself enough now. Here's your lesson for the day. Have a 10 year old read and explain it to you.

"Obstruction of justice is defined in the omnibus clause of 18 U.S.C. § 1503, which provides that "whoever . . . . corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be (guilty of an offense)." Persons are charged under this statute based on allegations that a defendant intended to interfere with an official proceeding, by doing things such as destroying evidence, or interfering with the duties of jurors or court officers."

Lazy fucktard. It takes about 5 seconds to find that reference.

Again you fucking moron... now tell us what it is you think Trump did with regard to the above. But let me guess... you will run away AGAIN from doing so?
 
Illiterate fuck can’t find a 10 year old to read to him. How the fuck do you manage in life? Do you not even understand the meaning of the word “or”?

Damn! I have never seen such a fucking idiot. I even highlighted the pertinent parts for you and you still fuck it up. Pitiable.

Plenty of evidence. He tried to intimidate Comey in their meetings and asked him to let the Flynn investigation go. He told the Russians that he fired Comey because of the investigation and admitted it to Holt in that interview. Now, I see he ordered Mueller to be fired, but backed off when the WH Counsel threatened to wuit.

Your desperation is showing, pal. Try self-medicating.

1) You are completely making up the part about him trying to intimidate Comey.
2) The President has the right to direct the FBI investigations. Asking something is not the same as ordering it. The evidence of that is that the investigation continued. You fucking moron.
3) More anonymous sources of the supposed directive to his subordinates that he wanted to fire Mueller? Lets assume for a moment that the NY times isn't lying again about sources. Lets assume it is correct. If he asked his counsel to do something and they said it wasnt a good idea and Trump listened to his counsel, then he once again didn't do anything wrong. You fucking simpleton.

You have proven beyond a doubt that you have no clue what you are talking about.
 
An individual at the FBI being terminated does nothing to obstruct an ongoing investigation by the FBI on the whole. He would have to actively seek to stop the investigation completely or interfere with it. Given Comey's negligence in how he handled the Clinton email situation, he should have been fired and more competent people appointed to run the investigation into collusion.

Again... what was obstructed?

heres your problem idiot


what if the perp doesn't understand that ?


are they too stupid to commit a crime ?



trump fired Comey and then said to the russians he invited into the oval office (and wouldn't let American press in but let Russian press in to see the party) that he got rid of the investigation by firing Comey.



he fired him to stop the investigation


he said it to Lester Holt on national TV



the fact that he was too stupid to know it wouldnt stop the investigation is meaningless
 
You don't know how to read a statute. You conveniently left out the ELEMENTS you dirty Dumb Dumber.

He must commit certain actions for the bolded to be chargeable you effing eternal Dumb Dumber.

It’s impossible to explain something in writing, even with bolded highlights, when someone has zero literacy skills.
 
reread the part I put in parenthesis... :)

"nor have they found any evidence of obstruction (at least not that has been made public). That said, I do think it is bogus to continue as they should have been able to prove a case by now."

A. You are not a prosecutor and don't have a clue about how long such a thorough investigation should take. How long did the Watergate investigation take?

B. There is PLENTY of evidence of obstruction that even the untrained eye can see. Still wondering how you can come to your conclusions without being a Trump supporter.

C. Some history for you ..

'Saturday Night Massacre': Key figures in Nixon's 1973 Justice Department purge
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/la-ol-the-saturday-night-massacre-20170130-htmlstory.html
 
He literally takes two small sentences or part, and completely ignores the elements or conduct that one must engage in to be indicted. He basically is taking a murder statute and saying see, taking a life.... And proclaiming the murder is guilty of murder when they only killed a rat.

And he runs around calling others illiterate, too funny.

“Endeavors to impede due process of justice” doesn’t get much more straight forward, idiot. The mere order by Trump to fire Mueller meets that standard, regardless of whether the order was carried out. THAT’S the conduct, you fucking moron. Especially in the light if additional CONDUCT of firing Comey and admitting it was because of the Russian investigation.

Sad, illiterate fuck. Must be tough stumbling through life.
 
Again you fucking moron... now tell us what it is you think Trump did with regard to the above. But let me guess... you will run away AGAIN from doing so?

It's GLARINGLY OBVIOUS that firing Comey and his attempt to fire Mueller is evidence of his attempt to interfere with the investigation.

How is it that you don't know that?
 
Again you fucking moron... now tell us what it is you think Trump did with regard to the above. But let me guess... you will run away AGAIN from doing so?

I already stated that, you fucking idiot. What is with you Trumpsuckers and your inability to read?

He ORDERED Mueller to be fired. That means he endeavored to influence, obstruct or impede the due process of justice. As well as INTENDED to interfere with an official proceeding.

For all you illiterate fucks, notice that there is no requirement for him to be successful. Just that he intended to.

Do you need me to look up “endeavor” for you, moron?
 
1) You are completely making up the part about him trying to intimidate Comey.
2) The President has the right to direct the FBI investigations. Asking something is not the same as ordering it. The evidence of that is that the investigation continued. You fucking moron.
3) More anonymous sources of the supposed directive to his subordinates that he wanted to fire Mueller? Lets assume for a moment that the NY times isn't lying again about sources. Lets assume it is correct. If he asked his counsel to do something and they said it wasnt a good idea and Trump listened to his counsel, then he once again didn't do anything wrong. You fucking simpleton.

You have proven beyond a doubt that you have no clue what you are talking about.

1) Trump “Mr. Comey, do you like your job? Do you want to keep your job? I wish you could see your way clear to let the Flynn investigation go.”

2) That the investigation continued is irrelevant.

3) Corroborated by multiple sources that he ORDERED Mueller to be fired. Not merely discussed the possibility. ORDERED.

Dismissed dumbfuck. You just got your ass kicked.
 
1) Trump “Mr. Comey, do you like your job? Do you want to keep your job? I wish you could see your way clear to let the Flynn investigation go.”

2) That the investigation continued is irrelevant.

3) Corroborated by multiple sources that he ORDERED Mueller to be fired. Not merely discussed the possibility. ORDERED.

Dismissed dumbfuck. You just got your ass kicked.

Wrong again moron.

1) You making up what was said?
2) No, it is not irrelevant. Trump has every right to fire the head of the FBI. The head of the FBI works for the executive branch you fucking idiot. Firing one guy doesn't interfere with due process, the law or the investigation. Period.
3) No moron, he discussed. If it was an order, it would have been followed. You are relying on ANONYMOUS sources. Not a single person involved in the discussion has come forward to verify this.

You are truly a fucking idiot.
 
I already stated that, you fucking idiot. What is with you Trumpsuckers and your inability to read?

He ORDERED Mueller to be fired. That means he endeavored to influence, obstruct or impede the due process of justice. As well as INTENDED to interfere with an official proceeding.

For all you illiterate fucks, notice that there is no requirement for him to be successful. Just that he intended to.

Do you need me to look up “endeavor” for you, moron?

No moron. At best, assuming the anonymous sources are not just the NY Times LYING again, he discussed it with his attorneys. They talked him out of it. He did nothing to impede the investigation. You fucking simpleton.
 
Wrong again moron.

1) You making up what was said?
2) No, it is not irrelevant. Trump has every right to fire the head of the FBI. The head of the FBI works for the executive branch you fucking idiot. Firing one guy doesn't interfere with due process, the law or the investigation. Period.
3) No moron, he discussed. If it was an order, it would have been followed. You are relying on ANONYMOUS sources. Not a single person involved in the discussion has come forward to verify this.

You are truly a fucking idiot.

comey documented what trump said to him idiot
 
it is indeed ILLEGAL to fire them for reasons which include trying to derail or slow down the investigation
 
Back
Top