fuck Mueller and his "exonerations" what is he -the Pope?
Prosecutors NEVER EXONERATE.. he threw out a red herring and you idiots lapped it up
Fox News says Mueller report did NOT clear Trump
- Thread starter reagansghost
- Start date
Prosecutors NEVER EXONERATE.. he threw out a red herring and you idiots lapped it up
FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION”
A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
C. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia Investigation
D. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Corney
E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort,
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen
Indeed.
Until now, I don't recall reading of any prosecutor ever stating that although a person under investigation was not being indicted, they aren't being cleared.
spamming is not a rebuttal
FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION”
A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
C. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia Investigation
D. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Corney
E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort,
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen
repeated spamming is your style, however
One of these days, you just might comprehend it. Doubtful, though.
FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION”
A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
C. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia Investigation
D. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Corney
E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort,
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen
“So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”
What is your primary language? Not English.
Plagiarizing pussy
Members banned from this thread: Cypress, charver, White privilege is real, Jarod, Mott the Hoople, blackascoal, midcan5, evince, ZappasGuitar, signalmankenneth, Phantasmal, Rune, moon, iolo, Text Drivers are Killers, CFM, jbander, Bill, domer76, sear, archives, bhaktajan, Nomad, Micawber, TTQ64, zymurgy, crowonapost, Tomas Fabregas, J.kennedy, mak2, floridafan, CharacterAssassin, Anne and Margot, JqYaqui, ThatOwlWoman, Tranquillus in Exile, katzgar, DonaldvoTrumpovich, Jade Dragon, Nordberg, Crazy Cat Lady, Bourbon, Frank Apisa, TrippyHippy, Anne Frank, Gotcha68, Q-Tip, Centerleftfl, kudzu, volsrock, tff, PoliTalker, rjhenn, Patricktm, guno, Rigby5, jbander1, Fentoine Lum, Tacomaman, Rat Robbersson, Jack, Magaraja, magellan, rhym3pays, LV426, Old Trapper, jacka, Lesh, taribalko2, NiftyNiblick, TempleEvenson, thumbsupkid, Chloé, SkinnyTS, jimmymccready, reagansghost, Apple Lung-Li-Chiao, Alis, Oneuli, Adolf_Twitler, Wilhelm Zenz, Yurty and BryanJ
84
countryboy
Verified User
That is a Department of Justice Rule, and could be challenged in court easily. Furthermore, he can be indicted after he is out of office, and long before any statute of limitations would take effect.
Nor did he indicate there was reason to go farther and closed his office! No collusion no evidence of obstruction!
will you ever post more then a rant? not likely at this rate
countryboy
Verified User
The libs and never trumper's at Fox News have been saying this since the Mueller report came out. Where the fuck have you been?
FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION”
A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
C. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia Investigation
D. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Corney
E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort,
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen
Darth Omar
Russian asset
But Trump is not not guilty lol.
As Victor Hanson put it, they invented a new category just for Trump.
Southern Chicken
Verified User
A prosecutor doesn’t exonerate. He either finds enough evidence to charge someone or he doesn’t