Fox News says Mueller report did NOT clear Trump

reagansghost said:
no it's not, ask Barr

too easy
Click to expand...

Again moron... it is a DOJ letter ruling, it doesn't stop him from reaching conclusions. I know you are not very bright, so I will spell it out for you again. Maybe this time you will comprehend what is written.

IF Mueller was going by the DOJ letter ruling, then he could have stated he had enough evidence to indict, but due to the ruling, the indictment would come after Trump was out of office.

He fully had the power to reach conclusions, in fact, that is what he was hired to do.
 
Superfreak said:
Again moron... it is a DOJ letter ruling, it doesn't stop him from reaching conclusions. I know you are not very bright, so I will spell it out for you again. Maybe this time you will comprehend what is written.

IF Mueller was going by the DOJ letter ruling, then he could have stated he had enough evidence to indict, but due to the ruling, the indictment would come after Trump was out of office.

He fully had the power to reach conclusions, in fact, that is what he was hired to do.
Click to expand...

It was as if Mullet wanted the force of a [recommended] indictment without actually just coming out and saying it.

It was a strange ending to his investigation. Small wonder he doesn’t want to talk about it.
 
Last edited:
domer76 said:
FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION”


A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
C. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia Investigation
D. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Corney
E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort,
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen
Click to expand...



This just states his account of what happened. It doesn't state conclusions. The paragraph before this even list this as an inquiry and not a conclusion.
 
reagansghost said:
Fox News urged viewers to read Robert Mueller’s report in its entirety on Tuesday, emphasizing that the special counsel did not exonerate President Donald Trump.

While covering the battle between House Democrats and the Justice Department over the Mueller report, Smith noted that the Russia investigation found multiple instances of potential obstruction on behalf of Trump, but that the special counsel followed DOJ guidelines in declining to prosecute the sitting president.

“Remember, in his 400-plus page report — that everyone in America should read, everyone — Robert Mueller laid out ten instances of apparent obstruction of justice, criminal obstruction of justice, potentially, by President Trump,” the Fox News anchor said. “The special counsel did not exonerate the president. They said if they could’ve they would’ve but they couldn’t so they didn’t.”

“Mueller explained that if he and his team had confidence that the president did not commit obstruction, they would have said so. He also said that under Justice Department guidelines, charging the president with a crime was never an option to him. He said the Constitution requires another process,” Smith continued, referring to Mueller’s suggestion that Congress take up his report.


https://www.mediaite.com/tv/shepard...he-mueller-report-it-did-not-exonerate-trump/
Click to expand...

Really funny that you are a Fox News supporter.
 
DEMOCRAT domer76 said:
Plagiarizing pussy Members banned from this thread: Cypress, charver, White privilege is real, Jarod, Mott the Hoople, blackascoal, midcan5, evince, ZappasGuitar, signalmankenneth, Phantasmal, Rune, moon, iolo, Text Drivers are Killers, CFM, jbander, Bill, domer76, sear, archives, bhaktajan, Nomad, Micawber, TTQ64, zymurgy, crowonapost, Tomas Fabregas, J.kennedy, mak2, floridafan, CharacterAssassin, Anne and Margot, JqYaqui, ThatOwlWoman, Tranquillus in Exile, katzgar, DonaldvoTrumpovich, Jade Dragon, Nordberg, Crazy Cat Lady, Bourbon, Frank Apisa, TrippyHippy, Anne Frank, Gotcha68, Q-Tip, Centerleftfl, kudzu, volsrock, tff, PoliTalker, rjhenn, Patricktm, guno, Rigby5, jbander1, Fentoine Lum, Tacomaman, Rat Robbersson, Jack, Magaraja, magellan, rhym3pays, LV426, Old Trapper, jacka, Lesh, taribalko2, NiftyNiblick, TempleEvenson, thumbsupkid, Chloé, SkinnyTS, jimmymccready, reagansghost, Apple Lung-Li-Chiao, Alis, Oneuli, Adolf_Twitler, Wilhelm Zenz, Yurty and BryanJ 84
Click to expand...


I have little to no patience with liars or the willfully ignorant. Both are choices that cretinous and foolish people make. We are all ignorant of certain things, but to remain willfully so is inexcusable. - I have little to no patience with liars or the willfully ignorant. Both are choices that cretinous and foolish people make. We are all ignorant of certain things, but to remain willfully so is inexcusable. - I have little to no patience with liars or the willfully ignorant. Both are choices that cretinous and foolish people make. We are all ignorant of certain things, but to remain willfully so is inexcusable. - I have little to no patience with liars or the willfully ignorant. Both are choices that cretinous and foolish people make. We are all ignorant of certain things, but to remain willfully so is inexcusable. - I have little to no patience with liars or the willfully ignorant. Both are choices that cretinous and foolish people make. We are all ignorant of certain things, but to remain willfully so is inexcusable. - I have little to no patience with liars or the willfully ignorant. Both are choices that cretinous and foolish people make. We are all ignorant of certain things, but to remain willfully so is inexcusable. - I have little to no patience with liars or the willfully ignorant. Both are choices that cretinous and foolish people make. We are all ignorant of certain things, but to remain willfully so is inexcusable. - I have little to no patience with liars or the willfully ignorant. Both are choices that cretinous and foolish people make. We are all ignorant of certain things, but to remain willfully so is inexcusable. -

Loser.

:rofl2:
 
Superfreak said:
Really funny that you are a Fox News supporter.
Click to expand...

no longer a supporter?...........takin that Hannity sticker off the Hyundai?

“Mueller explained that if he and his team had confidence that the president did not commit obstruction, they would have said so. He also said that under Justice Department guidelines, charging the president with a crime was never an option to him. He said the Constitution requires another process,” Smith continued, referring to Mueller’s suggestion that Congress take up his report.

FOX NEWS..........wow
 
Superfreak said:
bottom line: Mueller could have recommended indictment. He did not. Done.
Click to expand...

Literally, no: “Mueller explained that if he and his team had confidence that the president did not commit obstruction, they would have said so. He also said that under Justice Department guidelines, charging the president with a crime was never an option to him. He said the Constitution requires another process,” Smith continued, referring to Mueller’s suggestion that Congress take up his report."

All you do is lie.

I think it's because you've spent so much of your life lying that you don't even know what it is to tell the truth anymore.
 
Superfreak said:
Wrong. First, that is a DOJ guideline. Second, Mueller was still able to recommend indictment... it simply would have been delayed until Trump was out of office under the guideline.
Click to expand...


So once Trump is out of office, Mueller recommends an indictment.

So what is your point?
 
It took Fox News 8 days to do this after PBS NewsHour ran a nightly segment for a week.

Right on top of things - NOT!

It's The Trump Channel.
 
Last edited:
Superfreak said:
Mueller could have reached the conclusion if he felt he had the evidence.
Click to expand...

He literally said it wasn't on his mind: “He also said that under Justice Department guidelines, charging the president with a crime was never an option to him. He said the Constitution requires another process,”
 
LV426 said:
Literally, no: “Mueller explained that if he and his team had confidence that the president did not commit obstruction, they would have said so. He also said that under Justice Department guidelines, charging the president with a crime was never an option to him. He said the Constitution requires another process,” Smith continued, referring to Mueller’s suggestion that Congress take up his report."

All you do is lie.

I think it's because you've spent so much of your life lying that you don't even know what it is to tell the truth anymore.
Click to expand...

This is probably pointless but here goes lol.

You understand the distinction between a conclusion and a formal charge, right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top