Fox News says Mueller report did NOT clear Trump

Southern Chicken said:
See
Click to expand...

Your limp dick is just the characterization of your impotent argument.

You lie about reading the report, and when asked to explain details from the report, you can't.

You stall.

You deflect.

All because you didn't read the report, did you? Be honest. I can tell when you're lying.
 
LV426 said:
Nope.

Here's what you said:



So if you read and understood the report, then you can explain why Trump ordered his son to lie about the reason for the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Russia?

Please proceed, governor...
Click to expand...


Cliff note:

"Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct"
 
LV426 said:
So if you "comprehend" the Mueller report, then you can explain why Trump ordered Cohen to lie about the Moscow Project to Congress?
Click to expand...
The Mueller report explained it as follows:

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct.
 
Southern Chicken said:
The Mueller report explained it as follows:

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct.
Click to expand...

Don’t you find it interesting that it wasn’t discussed at the outset of Mullet’s investigation that ‘no ultimate conclusions’ about Trump’s conduct were going to come out?
 
Darth Omar said:
Don’t you find it interesting that it wasn’t discussed at the outset of Mullet’s investigation that ‘no ultimate conclusions’ about Trump’s conduct were going to come out?
Click to expand...

Why should be? Nothing else was released to the public by Mueller.
 
reagansghost said:
Fox News urged viewers to read Robert Mueller’s report in its entirety on Tuesday, emphasizing that the special counsel did not exonerate President Donald Trump.

While covering the battle between House Democrats and the Justice Department over the Mueller report, Smith noted that the Russia investigation found multiple instances of potential obstruction on behalf of Trump, but that the special counsel followed DOJ guidelines in declining to prosecute the sitting president.

“Remember, in his 400-plus page report — that everyone in America should read, everyone — Robert Mueller laid out ten instances of apparent obstruction of justice, criminal obstruction of justice, potentially, by President Trump,” the Fox News anchor said. “The special counsel did not exonerate the president. They said if they could’ve they would’ve but they couldn’t so they didn’t.”

“Mueller explained that if he and his team had confidence that the president did not commit obstruction, they would have said so. He also said that under Justice Department guidelines, charging the president with a crime was never an option to him. He said the Constitution requires another process,” Smith continued, referring to Mueller’s suggestion that Congress take up his report.


https://www.mediaite.com/tv/shepard...he-mueller-report-it-did-not-exonerate-trump/
Click to expand...

So now Democrats believe Fox is a truthful news source....

:rofl2:
 
domer76 said:
Why should be? Nothing else was released to the public by Mueller.
Click to expand...

If it’s this ‘all-important DOJ policy’ one would think someone would have told the media Mullet wouldn’t so much as provide a conclusion to his own investigation. Nobody gave a crap about Manafort or Stone—they were waiting to see if Trump was guilty of a crime or not.

And we get the report and ‘it’s Trump is not not guilty’ or some absurd legal gibberish.
 
Darth Omar said:
If it’s this ‘all-important DOJ policy’ one would think someone would have told the media Mullet wouldn’t so much as provide a conclusion to his own investigation. Nobody gave a crap about Manafort or Stone—they were waiting to see if Trump was guilty of a crime or not.

And we get the report and ‘it’s Trump is not not guilty’ or some absurd legal gibberish.
Click to expand...

“One would think” :rofl2:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top