God damn Indians and Democrats

Just for you, Sailor, here's the answer.

There is no direct connection between "having a constitution" and "being (or not being) a democracy".

If a country has a constitution, what matters is what they do with it. For example, 1930s USSR had a great codified constitution but Stalin ignored it. See?

Yes and I understand its a pretty well reasoned document. But "the paper cannot hold the iron" -outlaw josey wales....I think
 
Supreme Court Enables Mass Disenfranchisement of North ...
https://www.aclu.org/blog/voting-rights/supreme-court-enables-mass...
Oct 12, 2018 · On Tuesday, the Supreme Court chose to stand by and allow the war against voting to continue. Just a little less than a month before midterm elections that will determine control of Congress, the court decided not to block North Dakota’s restrictive voter ID law, which will make it harder for people in that state to cast their ballots.

the people don't have time to get the NEWLY required IDs


the scotus should have protected the voters
 
whining?

like you did for 8 years because Obama was fixing everything

You don't know how to stay on topic... You spent the first months of Trump era complaining about how the electoral college meant we aren't a democracy. Now you take the absurd position that we are one.

Narrator: We aren't a true democracy

Represent!
 
You don't know how to stay on topic... You spent the first months of Trump era complaining about how the electoral college meant we aren't a democracy. Now you take the absurd position that we are one.

Narrator: We aren't a true democracy

Represent!

link
 
whining?

like you did for 8 years because Obama was fixing everything

In reality, I had very few problems with Obama. He's a very likeable person even if you might disagree with him. The gun scandal, the insurance mandate, and the climate crap were about all I can think of. He pretty much did everything I expected he would have done anyway. The ACA was a free-for-all for the insurance and health industry as their product was the first the government ever declared everyone had to purchase. It's led to the same old problems because it was allowed to lead there. We said it would, and it did. There were no limits placed on pricing. How could it have worked?

Anyway, go find a real partisan to try that lame shit on. I'm not a blind follower of any ideology.
 
In reality, I had very few problems with Obama. He's a very likeable person even if you might disagree with him. The gun scandal, the insurance mandate, and the climate crap were about all I can think of. He pretty much did everything I expected he would have done anyway. The ACA was a free-for-all for the insurance and health industry as their product was the first the government ever declared everyone had to purchase. It's led to the same old problems because it was allowed to lead there. We said it would, and it did. There were no limits placed on pricing. How could it have worked?

Anyway, go find a real partisan to try that lame shit on. I'm not a blind follower of any ideology.

you are theirs and you vote with them

fuck you

your "Im only an idiot fact denier some times" aint getting it asshole
 
You don't know how to stay on topic... You spent the first months of Trump era complaining about how the electoral college meant we aren't a democracy. Now you take the absurd position that we are one.

Narrator: We aren't a true democracy

Represent!

link to your claim asshole?
 
You got that back assward...the USA is not a democracy.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/democracy




democracy noun

de·moc·ra·cy | \di-ˈmä-krə-sē


\
plural democracies
Definition of democracy
1
a
: government by the people
especially : rule of the majority
b
: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections
 
Supreme Court Enables Mass Disenfranchisement of North ...
https://www.aclu.org/blog/voting-rights/supreme-court-enables-mass...
Oct 12, 2018 · On Tuesday, the Supreme Court chose to stand by and allow the war against voting to continue. Just a little less than a month before midterm elections that will determine control of Congress, the court decided not to block North Dakota’s restrictive voter ID law, which will make it harder for people in that state to cast their ballots.

Wait let me guess they have to prove they are who they are:laugh:
 
Back
Top