How many women should be on the Supreme Court.?

[Truth Detector]

"whit", did you mean 'Whig'? (like in Whig Party member)

Riffing off of the rube's own post:

Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
It doesn't matter; it should always be the person who is best qualified to interpret the intent of the Constitution. It doesn't matter if they are male, female, whit, black or Asian.

You beat me to it, but I figured I'd chime in anyway.

It's so cute when leftists use absurdity to avoid debate.

 

[Truth Detector]

How many white american males are this terrified and snowflakey over sharing a nation with women and black folk?

Loves his strawmen.

 

[Bourbon]

There should be gender blindfolds on when picking a justice

Maybe Donny will just give them the old crotch squeeze test ...

 

[MAGA MAN]

You ignored the wink which implied "sarcasm"

The other guy's comments are just more in the same type of comments made by a racist

..but I get the feeling you were more bothered by what the "lib" said

If he's racist then he's likely proud of it and would happily admit to sexism.

I enjoy Burbon's sarcasm.

 

[Truth Detector]

In the interest of balance, we should have 9 women for a century or so.

How would nine women be better?

 

[Bourbon]

Make them all Supper Models in Bathing Suits ...

 

[Truth Detector]

Whites get way more welfare you idiot

Doesn't understand statistics and percentages.

 

[Truth Detector]

I love these meaningless discussions on "diversity"..Sotomayor is an idiot..diversify that...

 

[Truth Detector]

All should be Women ...

This one never does like putting any thought to anything before he posts. Just emotional eruptions.

 

[Ralph]

We've got 3 now but that's too many. Men and women are equal in numbers but NOT in value. Men become the engineers and businessmen and scientists that create wealth and give us this amazing hi-tech world. They are the farmers who feed us and the plumbers and auto-repairmen and electricians who keep things working. Women are english teachers and social workers - silly useless occupations.

Same can be said with even more force regarding blacks. How many of them do useful work?

Justice dictates that the SC be all white men.

There are 3 too many "unqualified" women on the SCOTUS...… any qualified candidate will do regardless of race, gender, or creed as long as they defend the US CONSITUTION first and foremost. If liberals want to kill their children under the guise of privacy at the state level go for it....the less future commicrats the better. There is no problem in the United States that "nature" will not correct on its own. Queers cant reproduce, child murders are growing less by the day every time a left wing nut kills her child. Patience "grasshopper". There has not been one successful socialist nation on earth....that has not removed individual freedom from its peoples. Hell even communist China did not begin to prosper until it decided to mirror and steal western technologies based upon free market capitalism.

The left's agenda is destined to fail from the beginning of the experiment...."The New Communist Deal" of FDR who all but bankrupted the United States over a 4 term reign as King of the United States. Fast forward 90 years and 22 Trillion in debt. The left is taking its last gasp as we speak.

 

[Truth Detector]

....but these same folks arguing why it should only be white men on the SC, will also tell you "but but, I'm not racist or sexist"

I have never seen anyone say the SCOTUS should only be white men. But you do love your strawmen.

 

[rhym3pays]

Loves his strawmen.

While you loving strawmen and such -- remember this thread is basically spawned from a white guy being snowflakey over too many girls being on the supreme court

Somehow, these same people never complained or asked "how many white guys should be on the SC?"

 

[PostmodernProphet]

4.5.....we need a cross dresser to make it work out.....

 

[Mott the Hoople]

If it's so wrong then you should have no trouble proving it. but instead you called your opposition "stupid". Of course that's an ad hom.

Are you kidding me? That would be a rhetorical exercise. Saying women have less value than men is in and of itself an ad hom logical fallacy not to mention being factually wrong.

 

[Rune]

Doesn't understand statistics and percentages.

Disagrees with facts

 

[MAGA MAN]

Are you kidding me? That would be a rhetorical exercise. Saying women have less value than men is in and of itself an ad hom logical fallacy not to mention being factually wrong.

You're spending all this time trying to justify your logical fallacy when you could easily disprove his assertion. Methinks you're just being a contrarian.

 

[Truth Detector]

Maybe Donny will just give them the old crotch squeeze test ...

It's so cute when liberals think they have the moral high ground.

 

[Truth Detector]

While you loving strawmen and such --

I don't love or do strawmen. You should know this if you ever pay my posts any attention. I do wish you didn't lie so much.

remember this thread is basically spawned from a white guy being snowflakey over too many girls being on the supreme court

Apparently you missed the premise of this thread and feel compelled to once more lie about what it is. How do you even know the thread author is white? Have you seen them? Met them? How do you know they are male? Did they tell you?

Somehow, these same people never complained or asked "how many white guys should be on the SC?"

Translation; you're going to continue constructing strawman arguments and insisting he break them down. No thanks.

 

[Truth Detector]

Saying women have less value than men is in and of itself an ad hom logical fallacy not to mention being factually wrong.

Who is making this argument strawman?

 

[Truth Detector]

Disagrees with facts.

Yes, you do that a lot. But I understand why.