Invaders Coming Our Way

christiefan915 said:
International law says they don't need to ask permission.

Article 1(A)(2) of the 1951 Convention defines a refugee as an individual who is outside his or her country of nationality or habitual residence who is unable or unwilling to return due to a well-founded fear of persecution based on his or her race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group. Applying this definition, internally displaced persons (IDPs) – including individuals fleeing natural disasters and generalized violence, stateless individuals not outside their country of habitual residence or not facing persecution, and individuals who have crossed an international border fleeing generalized violence are not considered refugees under either the 1951 Convention or the 1967 Optional Protocol.
Click to expand...

US law says this:

Asylum applicants have to establish that they are “refugees” as that term is defined by the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). This requires showing that they are unable or unwilling to return to their own countries because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.

AG Sessions is reviewing key cases and rendering decisions that provide guidelines for judges on asylum cases.

On March 7, 2018, he directed the Board of Immigration Appeals to refer the unpublished December 8, 2016, decision, “Matter of A-B-”, to him for his review. The Board granted asylum in this case to a victim of domestic violence, A-B-, who claimed persecution on account of membership in a particular social group described as, “El Salvadoran women who are unable to leave their domestic relationships where they have children in common.”

“An alien may suffer threats and violence in a foreign country for any number of reasons related to her social, economic, family or other personal circumstances,” Sessions wrote in his ruling. “Yet the statute does not provide redress for all misfortune.”

THEY HAVE TO GO BACK. :D


https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/392409-sessions-domestic-abuse-decision-didnt-change-asylum-law-just-applied-it
 
Wolverine said:
They are criminal invaders, and should be stopped miles before they get to the border, and if Mexico has a problem with that, end them also.
Click to expand...

They aren't here so they aren't invading us, and you have no proof they're criminals. trump's mindless comment about Middle Easterners and gangs is just more fear-mongering.
 
Wolverine said:
How many can we send to you for you to take care of, completely? That includes medical, when you can't pay, they will be sent back where they came from, and you go with them.
Click to expand...

Are you the same person who was talking about Christianity and belief in God on another thread? What would Jesus do?

Exodus 23:9 "You shall not oppress a stranger, since you yourselves know the feelings of a stranger, for you also were strangers in the land of Egypt."

Hebrews 13:2 "Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for by this some have entertained angels without knowing it."

1 John 3:15 "Everyone who hates his brother is a murderer; and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him."
 
christiefan915 said:
They aren't here so they aren't invading us, and you have no proof they're criminals. trump's mindless comment about Middle Easterners and gangs is just more fear-mongering.
Click to expand...

Their intention is to illegally breach our border. It's a fact that most Latino gangs are comprised largely of Central Americans. There are documented cases of Middle Eastern terrorists being smuggled into the USA over the southern border.

Quit shilling for the illegal immigrant invasion.
 
Legion said:
Their intention is to illegally breach our border. It's a fact that most Latino gangs are comprised largely of Central Americans. There are documented cases of Middle Eastern terrorists being smuggled into the USA over the southern border.

Quit shilling for the illegal immigrant invasion.
Click to expand...

The government can collect biometric data as they pass through the different countries. Internal U.S. government documents on the caravan make no mention of Middle Easterners, criminals or a terror threat.
Perhaps you should look into this. Google is your friend.

And stop pouting already. :D
 
Legion said:
They won't. Almost all of them "voted" to keep going and reject Mexico's offer of asylum. Try to keep up.
Click to expand...

That's funny. I just read that in the last three days 1,000 applied for refugee status in Mexico. I will stay on top of this story and keep you informed as the total changes.

Stop pouting already.
 
Legion said:
Who told you that?

BTW, you have no access to internal government documents.
Click to expand...

The article I posted above which you obviously didn't read.

THE FACTS: The Department of Homeland Security is able to gather biometric data as migrants pass between the borders of Central American countries. A former senior intelligence official who continues to be briefed on current intelligence told NBC News that there is no evidence that any Middle Eastern terrorists are hiding in the caravan. Middle Eastern and African immigrants have routinely crossed illegally across the U.S.-Mexico border for years, but their numbers pale in comparison to the number of Central Americans. Last fiscal year, they accounted for less than one out of every 100 — 0.7 percent — of border apprehensions, according to DHS. Instances of known or suspected terrorists crossing the southern border are incredibly rare, the official said. In addition, internal U.S. government documents on the caravan make no mention of Middle Easterners, criminals or a terror threat.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top