“Mt. Rushmore glorifies white supremacy” - The Democratic Party

Yet Trump hasn't spoken a single word about it. By your logic, Trump supports countries who put bounties on American troops.

What I'm saying is, no. Silence doesn't make consent in all cases. Why would BLM support looters and criminals? Seems to me that would work against them.

That is my question. Why would they? Even if it is not so, they are giving the appearance that they agree with it.
 
I don't think all non-white people hate white people and I don't think they're actually oppressed. However, most of them think they're oppressed and that can easily lead to them hating white people or at least cause them to fight for policies that help the non-white population at the expense of Whites.
Of course not all non-white people are racist, but most of them do support things like reparations and open borders. This is what happens when a country becomes multiracial. Minorities all see themselves as the outsiders fighting against oppression. It's especially bad in the West because we also have the media telling them this.
And when a group of people is hated, like Whites are now hated, the establishment can sway people to commit acts of violence against said group.

I think the only group that 'hates' White People are Blacks, and that's because of slavery. All the other groups want to prosper and flourish in the 'Land of Opportunity'.
'Blacks' find it convenient and a Good Strategy to mix in and include 'Other Groups' to help swell their ranks. I don't buy this and I don't think other groups do as well.
 
That is my question. Why would they? Even if it is not so, they are giving the appearance that they agree with it.

They wouldn't. It's self destructive.

That said, just because a group of sailors in a bar see two gays fighting and they don't stop it doesn't mean 1) they're homophobic or 2) the United States Navy condones gays fighting. It only means they didn't want to get involved with criminal behavior.
 
They wouldn't. It's self destructive.

That said, just because a group of sailors in a bar see two gays fighting and they don't stop it doesn't mean 1) they're homophobic or 2) the United States Navy condones gays fighting.

Not unless the group of landlubbers (did you catch that) are marching or rioting in protest for gay rights. Kind of defeats of the purpose right?
 
Not unless the group of landlubbers (did you catch that) are marching or rioting in protest for gay rights. Kind of defeats of the purpose right?

How does gays fighting each other further gay rights? How does allowing looting and shooting further civil rights?
 
If not wanting races to mix is racist, then the Japanese are extremely racist.

Japanese are (were?) very racist....at least in the 1980s when I was there. Japanese babies could not be adopted in the US but if it was a mixed baby then it was "take two!"
 
I think the only group that 'hates' White People are Blacks, and that's because of slavery. All the other groups want to prosper and flourish in the 'Land of Opportunity'.
'Blacks' find it convenient and a Good Strategy to mix in and include 'Other Groups' to help swell their ranks. I don't buy this and I don't think other groups do as well.

Brown people might not buy that Blacks are still so oppressed, but they do agree that Whites are the main oppressors. And like every other group, Mestizos are fighting for their own interests, even when it hurts the white population.
So when white people are a minority, and the establishment is convincing everyone that white people are the problem, a lot of non-white people will be swayed to commit violence against us. Will it be all Mestizos? Of course not. But considering how much anti-white sentiment we already have, chances are there will be more than enough people in every non-white group to cause a white genocide.
And it's not like this is new. Hated minorities have always suffered violence throughout history. Whites are already hated, what's going to happen when we're also a minority? And it's not like Hispanics are above this. Latin America is probably the most racist place in the world.
 
If the one indicator is that you're against miscegenation, I guess so.

It's more than that as I've repeatedly pointed out to you. You're against miscegenation, you're pro-segregation and, most importantly, you think "race" is genetic.
 
How does gays fighting each other further gay rights? How does allowing looting and shooting further civil rights?[/QUOTE]

Exactly! That is my point. Do you not think BLM would be making it a point to say that? To show the difference? Why would they NOT do that?
 
Dutch, Proudlefty, thank you for a decent conversation. Maybe I can pick it up tomorrow. Coming ashore unfortunately. Only for a short while thankfully. Good night.
 
It's more than that as I've repeatedly pointed out to you. You're against miscegenation, you're pro-segregation and, most importantly, you think "race" is genetic.

Well most people think race is genetic. But since everything is racist these days, being called racist is no biggy.
 
I believe he said races tend to self segregate if left on their own.

I deem the statement: mostly to very much true.

well to be fair, he's also said white people should run white countries and black people should run black countries......that's a few shades beyond mere self-segregation.......
 
Back
Top