NAZI DEMOCRATS will ignite a civil war

T

Terri4Trump

Verified User
The Democrats are claiming that there is going to be “a RED MIRAGE” on Election Day where it will appear that President Trump has been re-elected. THEN the mail-in ballots, which will be predominately Democrat, will arrive, and the true results will show that Biden has won.

Translation: We are going to see how many votes we need to win, and then we will create more than enough votes to steal the election. After that we will go to court until the activist judges give the election to us.

Hillary Clinton laid out the strategy when she said that Biden should NEVER concede. You keep litigating in the courts until the Democrats win.
 
10479401_0.jpg
 
Terri4Trump said:
The Democrats are claiming that there is going to be “a RED MIRAGE” on Election Day where it will appear that President Trump has been re-elected. THEN the mail-in ballots, which will be predominately Democrat, will arrive, and the true results will show that Biden has won.

Translation: We are going to see how many votes we need to win, and then we will create more than enough votes to steal the election. After that we will go to court until the activist judges give the election to us.

Hillary Clinton laid out the strategy when she said that Biden should NEVER concede. You keep litigating in the courts until the Democrats win.
Click to expand...

No Lefty refutation?
 
Michael_Panetta said:
Rush is a propagandist. He spews misinformation and half-truths to such a degree that he's a joke to everyone outside of Rightwingland.
Click to expand...

Non Sense I used to listen to him at work, till some leftist pansy got his panties in a bunch, and said it upset him. He works in a completely different area, and can't even hear my radio, but guess what, I can no longer listen. When I did I would pay attention to what he predicted about what dems would do, and the guy was so spot on it was scary!
 
Terri4Trump said:
The Democrats are claiming that there is going to be “a RED MIRAGE” on Election Day where it will appear that President Trump has been re-elected. THEN the mail-in ballots, which will be predominately Democrat, will arrive, and the true results will show that Biden has won.

Translation: We are going to see how many votes we need to win, and then we will create more than enough votes to steal the election. After that we will go to court until the activist judges give the election to us.

Hillary Clinton laid out the strategy when she said that Biden should NEVER concede. You keep litigating in the courts until the Democrats win.
Click to expand...



Gaslighting Democrats Claim Trump Will Win on Election Night, But Lose After Mail-In Ballots!

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/...lection-night-but-lose-after-mail-in-ballots/

RUSH: Here’s an exclusive story. This is from Axios. It’s a Millennial news site. “Bloomberg group warns Trump will appear to win big on election night.” This is a — no, no, no. I’ve not forgotten the caller’s question. Not at all. I just want to deal with this stuff as it has come in.

A top Democrat data firm which goes by the name of Hawkfish is warning that it is highly likely that Trump will appear to be way ahead on election night but could ultimately lose when all the votes are counted in the ensuing days and weeks. Now, what the hell is this? Why the heck would you even run such a story? Because this story dovetails with already established Democrat agendas. . . . .
. . . . here comes Axios, a website and news source you believe as a card-carrying leftist radical and they’re telling you that on election night Donald Trump is going to appear to win in a landslide, your day has just been ruined, your year has just been ruined. That’s the last thing you want to hear. And your own people are telling you this. And then here comes the cherry on top. Don’t worry. Don’t worry. Because 10 days later after we’ve counted all of the mail-in ballots, then Trump is gonna lose, and Trump’s gonna lose big.

Now, what this is is a big-time five-alarm fire warning. Axios and the Drive-By Media are warning the radical leftists in the Democrat Party, anybody and everybody that’s gonna vote that they’re gonna have to work even harder on the fraud side to beat Trump. For example, this is coded language. Ballot harvesting is going to have to be much bigger, much more aggressive than even it was in California in previous elections.

So this is a major warning. I told you yesterday that the internal polls on the Biden campaign must be horrible, and this is evidence. Those internal polls must be worse than we even imagined, because that’s exactly what this is. This is a dire warning. And it’s also an attempt to make sure that their troops don’t go insane on election night.

So it’s a warning, “Look. Election night, it’s gonna appear Trump has won in a landslide, but don’t worry. The election isn’t gonna be over on election night. No, no, no. Vote by mail as many times as you can. By the time we count all those votes, Trump is gonna lose. It’s a psychological assist. It’s a psychological warning. Folks, it’s worse than they imagined.

And by the way, how many of you — I know there’s no way of answering — how many of you have become convinced that Trump is gonna lose in a landslide, independent of all this that we have just learned today? Just in the normal ebb and flow, we got the virus, oh, no, the economy, regardless the virus, the economy is so bad, people in charge during bad things oftentimes get blamed, there’s no way Trump can win. How many of you are telling yourselves this? How many of you are watching the Drive-By Media pretty much saying it’s wrapped up, it’s over with, Biden’s up by 10, he’s up by 8, he’s up by 12. How many of you are you convinced Trump’s gonna lose, already has lost?

The usual complaints finally have taken root. Yeah, all these past four years, all of a sudden now everybody hates Trump’s tweets, oh, yeah, we finally got to get Trump out of there, people hate Trump’s tweets and they hate the fact that Trump is mean and all of this stuff that never touched Trump for three and a half years now all of a sudden is going to lead to his demise and defeat.

They have been making it all up as they go, the polls and all this. Now they’re getting scared. They’re sending out a warning that election night’s gonna look really, really, really bad. Remember Hillary saying, “Joe, whatever you do, don’t concede.” Remember that? Don’t concede. Don’t concede. Remember Michelle Obama and Barack Hussein O Obama, “Vote, vote, vote, vote, vote, vote, whatever you do, vote, vote, vote, vote,” during the Democrat convention.

I kept saying, you got it in the bag. You guys are up eight. You’re up 10. You’re up 12. What do you mean, vote, vote, vote, vote, vote? Didn’t go together. The things that they were saying about the election didn’t make sense since a bunch of people thought they already had it in the bag. And here’s Hillary saying, “Whatever you do, Joe, don’t concede. Never, ever concede. Don’t concede. Don’t concede.”

Now, people thought that Hillary was trying to share from her experience with Biden. That’s not what was going on. If Axios knows that it’s gonna look like a Trump landslide win on election night, they all know this. And by extension, they all now know what they’re going to have to do with mail-in ballots and whatever other examples of fraud you can come up with. Because on election night itself, it’s going to be appear to be devastating.

Now they’re out there saying, now everybody’s all of a sudden saying we won’t know the winner on election night. Didn’t Donald Trump catch holy hell for saying that if we vote by mail we won’t know who won for days, for weeks? Remember when Trump said that? He said we may not know on Inauguration Day who’s won if we allow this. And they mocked him, and they laughed at him, and they made fun of him like they always do. And it turns out now they are echoing what Trump said.
 
Wolverine said:
Non Sense I used to listen to him at work, till some leftist pansy got his panties in a bunch, and said it upset him. He works in a completely different area, and can't even hear my radio, but guess what, I can no longer listen. When I did I would pay attention to what he predicted about what dems would do, and the guy was so spot on it was scary!
Click to expand...

Yeah, because Rush's birther conspiracy theory was so true. Lol.

You know who Bill Maher is? Bill has invited Rush onto his show numerous times and Rush has always declined. Rush has attacked Maher on his own show, but he's too cowardly to have a direct conversation with Maher. Maher has even asked to go onto Rush's show. It's weird, because Maher has conservatives and liberals of all stripes on his show. Wonder what Rush is afraid of.
 
Michael_Panetta said:
Yeah, because Rush's birther conspiracy theory was so true. Lol.

You know who Bill Maher is? Bill has invited Rush onto his show numerous times and Rush has always declined. Rush has attacked Maher on his own show, but he's too cowardly to have a direct conversation with Maher. Maher has even asked to go onto Rush's show. It's weird, because Maher has conservatives and liberals of all stripes on his show. Wonder what Rush is afraid of.
Click to expand...

why would he give any sort of legitimacy to Maher, Maher is a friggin commie!

Obama was not born in Hawaii!
 
Michael_Panetta said:
. . . . Rush's birther conspiracy.......
Click to expand...


Excuse me you retard? Thats was Hillary's theory you idiot.

In 2008 Hillary invented that theory when she ran against Obama for the nomination and lost.

More racist Democrat crap trying to get pinned on conservatives.

You are the typical fascist POS.
 
Terri4Trump said:
Excuse me you retard? Thats was Hillary's theory you idiot.

In 2008 Hillary invented that theory when she ran against Obama for the nomination and lost.

More racist Democrat crap trying to get pinned on conservatives.

You are the typical fascist POS.
Click to expand...

Actually, no. Hillary never trafficked this claim. Some of her supporters did, but neither she nor her campaign ever did.

The man who started the conspiracy theory is Andy Martin, and that was back in 2004 when he was running against Obama for Senate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top