Ok, now that I've heard both, I believe Kavanaugh is telling the truth.

DonaldvoTrumpovich said:
I'd be fine with an FBI investigation. I'm not sure why he's balking at that.
I think the thing that's hurting Kavanaugh the most is that The Fucking Moron supports him so strongly.
Many people hate, loathe and despise Trump so much that they hate, loathe and despise anything he favors.
Click to expand...

So he agrees to an investigation.
The nomination is stalled, until after the mid-term elections.
The investigation reveals that he's not guilty.
Then what...………………..??
 
blackascoal said:
Then how do you claim he's innocent?

Why do people normally run from an FBI investigation?

BECAUSE THEY HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE.
Click to expand...

So he agrees to an investigation.
The nomination is stalled, until after the mid-term elections.
The investigation reveals that he's not guilty.
Then what...………………..??
 
blackascoal said:
They're ALL running like rabbits from an FBI investigation .. every single on of them on the right.
Click to expand...

So he agrees to an investigation.
The nomination is stalled, until after the mid-term elections.
The investigation reveals that he's not guilty.
Then what...………………..??
 
blackascoal said:
That's fucking stupid.

The Hill / Thomas investigation took 3 days.

Had your team began the investigation once this surfaced, it would already be done.
Click to expand...

So he agrees to an investigation.
The nomination is stalled, until after the mid-term elections.
The investigation reveals that he's not guilty.
Then what...………………..??
 
blackascoal said:
GOP finally wavering on Brett Kavanaugh? First Republican calls for FBI investigation
A GOP congressman is coming out for an FBI investigation and Sen. Susan Collins’ doubts about Kavanaugh are growing

For the first time, a Republican congressman has come out in favor of an FBI investigation into the sexual misconduct accusations against Brett Kavanaugh. This first GOP movement away from hardline support from the embattled Supreme Court nominee comes just as a key swing vote among Republican senators, Susan Collins of Maine, starts to waver in her support for the judge accused of multiple allegations of sexual misconduct.

"I think there should be an investigation by the FBI. I really do," Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., told The Hill on Wednesday. "What in the world difference would 10 days make? Why not wait 10 days, why not wait two weeks to find out the truth?" Jones argued that an FBI investigation could clear Kavanaugh's name and "help" him. When asked if he believed the women who have accused Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct, Jones said, "I don’t know enough information to say that. But they should be given the benefit of the doubt."

Jones's announcement that he thinks the FBI should investigate Kavanaugh may not matter much; as a member of the House of Representatives, Jones has no vote in whether or not Kavanaugh gets confirmed. More significant, however, is the fact that Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, has expressed reservations about voting to confirm Kavanaugh due to a new accusation that has come out against him, according to CNN. It is widely believed that if Collins decides to vote against Kavanaugh, her Republican colleague Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska would do likewise, which would defeat his confirmation if all of the Democrats also vote against him
https://www.salon.com/2018/09/27/go...first-republican-calls-for-fbi-investigation/
Click to expand...

So he agrees to an investigation.
The nomination is stalled, until after the mid-term elections.
The investigation reveals that he's not guilty.
Then what...………………..??
 
archives said:
Questioning Judge for beginners, evaluating the lie detector test, interviewing the individuals both sides claim have something to offer, etc., etc..
Click to expand...

So he agrees to an investigation.
The nomination is stalled, until after the mid-term elections.
The investigation reveals that he's not guilty.
Then what...………………..??
 
blackascoal said:
CLARENCE THOMAS DUMMY.

The FBI did investigate Anita Hill's accusation, and it took 3 days

(CNN)As Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers insist the FBI investigate her allegation of sexual and physical assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, here is a look back at how the FBI -- in three days -- investigated Anita Hill's sexual harassment allegations against Justice Clarence Thomas came about.

July 1, 1991: President George H.W. Bush nominated then-federal appeals court Judge Thomas to succeed Justice Thurgood Marshall.

September 3, 1991: Hill was first approached by the Judiciary Committee and was invited to provide background information on Thomas because she had worked with him, according to a New York Times article the following month, which cites a written statement from Hill that was sent to news organizations. (That statement adds that Hill decided to submit an affidavit after "numerous discussions" with the panel's staff, the Times reported.)

September 10, 1991: Thomas' initial hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee began.

September 12, 1991: According to then-Sen. Joe Biden, head of the Judiciary Committee, Hill first told the committee of the allegations on this day, as reported in the Times. Biden said she insisted her name not be used and Thomas not be told of the accusations, effectively tying the committee's hands.

September 20, 1991: After Hill spoke with the committee about her allegations "an FBI investigation was suggested" to her, according to comments she made at a news conference early the next month, published in the Times. "I spoke with the Judiciary Committee about it early in September, and through a number of discussions, it was not until the 20th of September that an F.B.I. investigation was suggested to me," Hill said. She later added, "There was a further breakdown even after that, what information would be shared. So there are a number of different points at which the communication broke down, understandings were not carried through."

Hill's comments in the news conference criticized the Judiciary Committee's handling of her complaint, saying she had tried for nearly two weeks in September to put a confidential account of her allegations before the 14 male members of the committee, the Times reported. The Times notes that Hill's account of what happened that September "differed markedly from the accounts offered" by the White House and Biden, "who said Ms. Hill's demand that her statements be kept confidential had impeded the committee."

September 23, 1991: Biden says in a statement reported in the Times that this is the date on which Hill agreed to allow the FBI to investigate the allegations.

Then-White House deputy press secretary Judy Smith said in a statement published by Newsday on October 6, 1991, that Hill's allegations of harassment were "brought to the attention of the Judiciary Committee" on September 23 -- a time frame that differs from Hill's account -- and the committee "immediately" informed the White House. The White House then "promptly directed the FBI to conduct a full, thorough and expeditious investigation," according to the statement.

September 26, 1991: Three days later, the FBI completed its investigation, and a report was submitted to the White House and the Judiciary Committee, according to Smith's statement. "The White House reviewed the report and determined that the allegation was unfounded," the statement said.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/19/politics/anita-hill-clarence-thomas-allegations-timeline/index.html
Click to expand...

So he agrees to an investigation.
The nomination is stalled, until after the mid-term elections.
The investigation reveals that he's not guilty.
Then what...………………..??
 
Her accusation of Judge Kavanaugh isn’t credible. She lied about flying. The other people she said were at this house, of which she doesn’t recall who owned it, say it never happened. She couldn’t remember if the lie detection test was recorded or not. She couldn’t remember if she’d shown actual notes of her therapist to a reporter or not. She has convenient lapses of memory at every crucial turn in her story.
 
blackascoal said:
SHOULD KAVANAUGH ASK FOR AN FBI INVESTIGATION, AND TAKE A POLYGRAPH?

Yes or no will do.
Click to expand...

So he agrees to an investigation.
The nomination is stalled, until after the mid-term elections.
The investigation reveals that he's not guilty.
Then what...………………..??
 
Micawber said:
Hi Cruz! Got a question of your witness???? Anything???? Not even a single question in this "investigation?"

He is so upset about democrats not asking questions!!!!
Click to expand...

So he agrees to an investigation.
The nomination is stalled, until after the mid-term elections.
The investigation reveals that he's not guilty.
Then what...………………..??
 
blackascoal said:
Dude, your posting shit like 'I swear to God' as your proof, but you don't have one fucking clue why anyone would avoid an FBI investigation. :0) got it
Click to expand...

So he agrees to an investigation.
The nomination is stalled, until after the mid-term elections.
The investigation reveals that he's not guilty.
Then what...………………..??
 
midcan5 said:
RE: Doc Ford was believable and straightforward and agreed to an FBI investigation, Kavanaugh was belligerent and didn't agree to a FBI investigation. His belligerence is the sign of any guilty person when caught, and his refusal for an FBI investigation is a sign he is a liar and knows it. The guilty always overact their innocence because they must also convince themselves as well as the other. Kavanaugh being the heartless bigot even dissented on the ACA and he lied about his position on Roe v Wade. Many people are easily fooled by dramatic exclamations of innocence, that he did well.

But if you read his record on wikipedia it will be the working class and the needy who suffer under him and the other four stooges. And unlike members of Congress, the justices cannot be voted out of office. When they behave arbitrarily, they face no consequences whatsoever. Good luck Trump snowflakes.

'Injustices: The Supreme Court's History of Comforting the Comfortable and Afflicting the Afflicted' Ian Millhiser


"THE LEGAL CASE against Obamacare was more than simply an indictment of the Supreme Court. It offered a direct window into how easily partisans can be convinced that something is unconstitutional simply because they want it to be. " from book above
Click to expand...

So he agrees to an investigation.
The nomination is stalled, until after the mid-term elections.
The investigation reveals that he's not guilty.
Then what...………………..??
 
Phantasmal said:
He could ask for it, it would have carried a lot of weight with those who can ask for it.
Click to expand...

So he agrees to an investigation.
The nomination is stalled, until after the mid-term elections.
The investigation reveals that he's not guilty.
Then what...………………..??
 
Phantasmal said:
An inquiry and the other witnesses testifying would establish accuracy of testimonies. He sure balked at the mention of July 7 brewskis with Judge, PT. It would be nice to know if he did drink and forget things or if he was a choir boy.
Click to expand...

So he agrees to an investigation.
The nomination is stalled, until after the mid-term elections.
The investigation reveals that he's not guilty.
Then what...………………..??
 
kudzu said:
Its not a trial .... He should ask the FBI to investigate unless he's guilty. He's a liar with a drinking problem.
Click to expand...

So he agrees to an investigation.
The nomination is stalled, until after the mid-term elections.
The investigation reveals that he's not guilty.
Then what...………………..??
 
J Craft said:
Her accusation of Judge Kavanaugh isn’t credible. She lied about flying. The other people she said were at this house, of which she doesn’t recall who owned it, say it never happened. She couldn’t remember if the lie detection test was recorded or not. She couldn’t remember if she’d shown actual notes of her therapist to a reporter or not. She has convenient lapses of memory at every crucial turn in her story.
Click to expand...

Spot on; and let's not forget the disingenuous claims from Dirty Dick Durbin and the rest of the miscreants on the Democratic side of the aisle, a SEVENTH FBI background check will NEVER stop these unethical lying asshats form making specious claims and trying to destroy anyone who doesn't goose step march in brown shirt fashion with them.

That is one of the biggest lies of all; that this will clear him and allow for all this to disappear after the SEVENTH FBI background check. This man is smeared forever no matter what.

He loved teaching; now, he will NEVER teach again. He loved coaching; now he will NEVER coach again. It is disgusting and despicable what the cretins on the left are willing to stoop to in their desperate bid to tell EVERYONE how they should think, behave and live.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top