Ok, now that I've heard both, I believe Kavanaugh is telling the truth.

That I believe.

I also know for a fact that are at least two Trump-worshipping rightwingers on this board who claim to have voted for Sanders in the primary. Presumably open-primary states.

I do not actually consider those people actual Sanders supporters, or supporters of liberalism or democratic socialism in any way.
I voted for sanders and then Trump. I'm a registered Dem ( old habit) and in a closed primary state.

Hillary for reasons i've gone over was unacceptable. full stop. no. she is a lying warmonger, and more .

Sanders took on income inequality. which I think is the real problem - not racial divides, not ideological.
If you don't have money in the USA you don't count. you are literally a throw away person that can live in a cardboard box for all society cares.

But he was also an "outsider", I mean not a true outsider like Trump, but he wasn't the same stale ID politics wing of the Dems. and He is definately not a warmonger. I figured he was better then stale Repubs and Dems

I voted for Trump because he gets the idea the world is broken into economic nationalists states.

China runs rampant over Tibet, and the South China sea, and violates trade agreements. etc.
The are a dangerous hegemon who only cares about China,and the hell with the rest of the world as need be.
( think of Middle Kingdom perspective)

That was my main thought process, of course more complicated, but where it's needed to drain the swamp-
even if characters like Rosenweasel survive..you gotta try, and DC is unable to reform itself at all
 
I voted for sanders and then Trump. I'm a registered Dem ( old habit) and in a closed primary state.

Hillary for reasons i've gone over was unacceptable. full stop. no. she is a lying warmonger, and more .

Sanders took on income inequality. which I think is the real problem - not racial divides, not ideological.
If you don't have money in the USA you don't count. you are literally a throw away person that can live in a cardboard box for all society cares.

But he was also an "outsider", I mean not a true outsider like Trump, but he wasn't the same stale ID politics wing of the Dems. and He is definately not a warmonger. I figured he was better then stale Repubs and Dems

I voted for Trump because he gets the idea the world is broken into economic nationalists states.

China runs rampant over Tibet, and the South China sea, and violates trade agreements. etc.
The are a dangerous hegemon who only cares about China,and the hell with the rest of the world as need be.
( think of Middle Kingdom perspective)

That was my main thought process, of course more complicated, but where it's needed to drain the swamp-
even if characters like Rosenweasel survive..you gotta try, and DC is unable to reform itself at all


I think if Bernie Sanders read a representative sampling of your posts here, he would tell you to fuck off - he doesn't want your vote.
 
Kavanaugh was a blackout mean drunk.

I believe he believes he didn't attempt to rape Ford.

I also believe her and that he did.

In any case Kavanaugh has demonstrated that he does not possess the temperament that a SC Justice requires.

He is an emotionally unstable hot head and a cry baby with a partisan attitude and a partisan agenda..
 
I think if Bernie Sanders read a representative sampling of your posts here, he would tell you to fuck off - he doesn't want your vote.
sanders has become a Democratic hack. it's too bad.
He's lost all pretenses of being an outsider. I wouldn't support him again,but he had it going for awhile there.

You see to be more into ideology, then practicality.. I have no use for an ideologue. It's a stale mind.
 
Don't believe all the lies.

People did not vote for President Obama then voted for dump........that's part of the cheating the racist right does when it comes to voting. Pure fucking lies.

nobody said they voted for Trump....we said they stayed home and had a malt liquor instead of voting for Hilliary.....
 
Not to mention that we got Yeltsin into office.
Bingo.
and we meddled in the Euromaidan to make damn sure we got a violent revolution.

It was idiotic,and it caused the Crimea annexation, and the ensuing hostilities.
That was John Mccain and Obama's Vicki Nuland's "fuck the EU" shenanigans
 
No! Not true! Not true at all.

Let me tell you something that Congressman Kennedy said a couple of days ago, that hit very much at home with me. What he said, was- "I am going to approach this hearing as if Mrs. Ford is my daughter, and that Judge Kavanaugh is my son." Now, having both a son and a daughter, I remember when I actually did have to listen to both of them to decide a true family matter pending before us, and where no way could both my son and daughter be telling me the truth, as their stories were in direct conflict with one another. What I learned was both them were actually telling me the truth, but because of an unknown factor not present until I further investigated the matter by contacting a 3rd party player, that was playing the matter from both sides, causing the problem in the first place.

So, yesterday, I also approached the witnessing of the testimonies as Kennedy said he did, and I came to the conclusion, that more evidence is needed to say one way or another. I'm still looking for a 3rd party player to break the tie.

I am not even at a position where I can take a stab at this one yet, without more evidence in the matter.

My opinions expressed here in this forum, are not necessarily motivated against Kavanaugh for any kind of political reason. My comments here are to try and point out the totally preposterous statements made by some of the most hateful Idiots here in this forum and to attack them and their careless and reckless statements they made here in this forum.

I am on their case, and will not relent, nor pull any punches. I will continue to point out their hatred and hypocrisy and stupidity!

I agree. There's not enough evidence to come to a legal conclusion. But, that's not what I said. I'm talking about my intuition. My experience interacting with people to get a feeling if they're truthful or not. I went into the hearing wanting to believe that Kavanaugh was guilty as hell but I put my bias aside and went with what my feelings, gut instinct, hunch told me as if I was a juror sitting on a jury. I wanted Kavanaugh to sound guilty, to look guilty, to be guilty and I found that he didn't appear that way. To me, he appeared to be telling the truth. The last thing I want to do is give Trump a victory but I didn't want to let that affect my opinion. It doesn't make me a racist. It doesn't make me a Trump supporter and it doesn't make me a misogynist.
I may be wrong. Kavanaugh may be a serial rapist. I'm just going with my gut and my gut is telling me he's innocent. Nothing more. Nothing less.
If those on the left want to lambast me for being honest with my feelings and observations, have at it.
 
A tool because I refused to let my pre-conceived bias affect my opinion?

Once again, I'll ask you. What could Kavanaugh have said or done or acted like in order for you to believe he was innocent?
Anything?

No answer from you will speak volumes.

First, not a tool because of what you believe .. a tool because you believe no one else has a right to make up their own minds. You believe because of your 'impartiality' that makes you more pure in your judgement. Nothing could be further from the truth. You're blinded by the desire to be impartial in spite of what is nothing more then just common sense.

To answer your question, he could have acted like he wasn't guilty.

He could have, and should have, demanded an FBI investigation. Instead he runs from it as though he has something to hide .. like his alcoholism and his belligerent nature when intoxicated.

Additionally, he's a liar. He's lied a lot throughout this process.

"I swear to God" is not proof of anything.
 
First, not a tool because of what you believe .. a tool because you believe no one else has a right to make up their own minds. You believe because of your 'impartiality' that makes you more pure in your judgement. Nothing could be further from the truth.

To answer your question, he could have acted like he wasn't guilty.

He could have and should have demanded an FBI investigation. Instead he runs from it as though he has something to hide .. like his alcoholism and his belligerent nature when intoxicated.
Additionally, he's a liar. He's lied a lot throughout this process.

"I swear to God" is not proof of anything.

Okay, be more specific. What could he have said or done to act like he wasn't guilty? I want details.

And your comment (red/bolded above) just isn't true. You have zero proof. Of course, you WANT it to be true which is why you probably believe it.

And please tell me where I said I believe no one else has a right to make up their own minds. You won't because you can't because I never said such a thing.

I do know that people tend to believe that which they want to be true. And I'm not saying I'm right and you're wrong. I just gave you my opinion.
If you can honestly say you came to the conclusion Kavanaugh was guilty with zero bias and impartiality, then I'll accept that.
But you have to base that on the truth, not speculation, conjecture and innuendo like "he's an alcoholic and has a belligerent nature when intoxicated" because there's zero evidence of such. You're just embellishing, just like Trump does all the time. Hey, you have something in common with Trump.
Congratulations!
 
Last edited:
Funny I thought she wanted to be anonymous and this remain confidential?

she could have asked for an FBI investigation 60 days ago or even 40 days ago or hell even 30 days ago... Fuck even 36 years ago

She has no authority to ask for an FBI investigation, hotshot.
 
Current events are a direct reflection of our History. This judge is where he is because of history. History of wealthy white males and their privilege. They have always had it and they are running our country today. They have always done what they wanted without consequence because of their wealth and power.

I grant you the male part.
Males were physically stronger before we evolved enough as a species that factors beyond physical strength determined power.

As for whites, however, there was a very restrictive social structure in places where EVERYBODY was white.
Areas had seriously homogeneous populations for centuries, and some had privilege while some didn't.
Let's try not to oversimplify complex dynamics.

Despicable African tribesmen cooperated with despicable European slave traders to capture people from other tribes.
They had power issues too.

All of us other than the special-needs neanderthals like Banjofuck deplore racism and sexism, I would hope.
I certainly do.
That doesn't mean that I don't have political issues with any women or black males.
Sometimes fighting with anti-Trumpanzees who have a different perspective from mine
is even more frustrating than fighting with the Trumpanzees themselves.

It's not that I have significantly different goals than the former as I do with the latter.
It's that I can't see their approach mitigating the problems in any way.
 
Okay, be more specific. What could he have said or done to act like he wasn't guilty? I want details.

And your comment (red/bolded above) just isn't true. You have zero proof. Of course, you WANT it to be true which is why you probably believe it.

And please tell me where I said I believe no one else has a right to make up their own minds. You won't because you can't because I never said such a thing.

How is it that you think you get to question others about proof when you don't have any yourself. YOU stated that "I swear to God" convinced you. Are you aware of how absolutely ridiculous that sounds?
I do know that people tend to believe that which they want to be true. And I'm not saying I'm right and you're wrong. I just gave you my opinion.
If you can honestly say you came to the conclusion Kavanaugh was guilty with zero bias and impartiality, then I'll accept that.
But you have to base that on the truth, not speculation, conjecture and innuendo like "he's an alcoholic and has a belligerent nature when intoxicated" because there's zero evidence of such. You're just embellishing, just like Trump does all the time. Hey, you have something in common with Trump.
Congratulations!

With all due respect, you've got all the details you need to make a sound judgement. He acts as though he's guilty. I don't think there is anything he could have said BECAUSE HE'S A LIAR.

Whatever bias anyone may have, that has nothing to do with the fact that he should have demanded an investigation, he should have taken a polygraph, he should have answered truthfully and straight-forwardly to the questions he was asked .. including whether he would ask for the FBI to investigate.

You are free to believe whatever you choose to believe, but demanding more proof/evidence of others then you are willing to provide simply makes no sense.

How do you make the bolded statement when you yourself don't have any proof .. none .. and you don't even seem to believe in common sense.

Your suggestion that I have something in common with Trump when you're giving faith-based answers is just monumentally silly .. and it makes you the tool that many have discovered that you are.
 
With all due respect, you've got all the details you need to make a sound judgement. He acts as though he's guilty. I don't think there is anything he could have said BECAUSE HE'S A LIAR.

Whatever bias anyone may have, that has nothing to do with the fact that he should have demanded an investigation, he should have taken a polygraph, he should have answered truthfully and straight-forwardly to the questions he was asked .. including whether he would ask for the FBI to investigate.

You are free to believe whatever you choose to believe, but demanding more proof/evidence of others then you are willing to provide simply makes no sense.

How do you make the bolded statement when you yourself don't have any proof .. none .. and you don't even seem to believe in common sense.

Your suggestion that I have something in common with Trump when you're giving faith-based answers is just monumentally silly .. and it makes you the tool that many have discovered that you are.

I don't need proof to prove he's innocent. The burden is on YOU to prove him guilty. (Innocent until proven guilty - Due Process).
And based on your bias (I don't think there is anything he could have said BECAUSE HE'S A LIAR), it's no wonder you say "he acts like he's guilty". You made up your mind before he even testified. Your prejudice and bias is on full display here.

I agree that he should've called for an FBI investigation. Not sure why he didn't. But, I'm not ready to say that means he's guilty. If the current FBI investigation finds something significant in Dr. Ford's favor, I will come here and admit I was wrong. Is there anything the FBI could uncover to make you believe that Kavanaugh is innocent or are you going to take the opinion that he's guilty to your grave regardless of the findings?

Dr. Ford has some holes in her statements as well. She can't provide a date or place that the assault occurred and that's a big deal. You would think if it was so traumatic, she would've at least remembered the date/time. Lindsay Graham had a good legal point. If you're going to levy such a serious charge against someone, you better have good evidence, which includes date/time/place.
 
I don't need proof to prove he's innocent. The burden is on YOU to prove him guilty. (Innocent until proven guilty - Due Process).
And based on your bias (I don't think there is anything he could have said BECAUSE HE'S A LIAR), it's no wonder you say "he acts like he's guilty". You made up your mind before he even testified. Your prejudice and bias is on full display here.

I agree that he should've called for an FBI investigation. Not sure why he didn't. But, I'm not ready to say that means he's guilty. If the current FBI investigation finds something significant in Dr. Ford's favor, I will come here and admit I was wrong. Is there anything the FBI could uncover to make you believe that Kavanaugh is innocent or are you going to take the opinion that he's guilty to your grave regardless of the findings?

Dr. Ford has some holes in her statements as well. She can't provide a date or place that the assault occurred and that's a big deal. You would think if it was so traumatic, she would've at least remembered the date/time. Lindsay Graham had a good legal point. If you're going to levy such a serious charge against someone, you better have good evidence, which includes date/time/place.

I don't need proof to prove he's innocent. :whoa:

Dude, you're a tool.

Feel free to claim yourself holy and pure .. but you should just join the Trump team where you'll be right at home making stupid ass statements like the bolded.
 
Current events are a direct reflection of our History. This judge is where he is because of history. History of wealthy white males and their privilege. They have always had it and they are running our country today. They have always done what they wanted without consequence because of their wealth and power.

I grant you the male part.
Males were physically stronger before we evolved enough as a species that factors beyond physical strength determined power.

As for whites, however, there was a very restrictive social structure in places where EVERYBODY was white.
Areas had seriously homogeneous populations for centuries, and some had privilege while some didn't.
Let's try not to oversimplify complex dynamics.

Despicable African tribesmen cooperated with despicable European slave traders to capture people from other tribes.
They had power issues too.


All of us other than the special-needs neanderthals like Banjofuck deplore racism and sexism, I would hope.
I certainly do.
That doesn't mean that I don't have political issues with any women or black males.
Sometimes fighting with anti-Trumpanzees who have a different perspective from mine
is even more frustrating than fighting with the Trumpanzees themselves.

It's not that I have significantly different goals than the former as I do with the latter.
It's that I can't see their approach mitigating the problems in any way.

Sorry, I don't buy this argument. Never have, never will.

It's used to justify white racism in the US.
 
A tool because I refused to let my pre-conceived bias affect my opinion?

Once again, I'll ask you. What could Kavanaugh have said or done or acted like in order for you to believe he was innocent?
Anything?

No answer from you will speak volumes.

Everything about his crazed behavior bespoke of his guilt. Everything. You would be hard pressed to find the comedian
who can lampoon it. Chris Farley? His crazed demeanor and combativeness and facial tics and blubbering and resisting straightforward questions
was so far off the reservation it was self parody. I was worried he might go on a raving rampage and start choking people.
He was a basketcase.
 
I don't need proof to prove he's innocent. :whoa:

Dude, you're a tool.

Feel free to claim yourself holy and pure .. but you should just join the Trump team where you'll be right at home making stupid ass statements like the bolded.

Speaking of being a tool, have you ever heard the term "Innocent until proven guilty"? It's what our whole legal system is based on.
It means EVERYONE starts out as INNOCENT and has to be PROVEN GUILTY with FACTS and EVIDENCE. You don't need evidence to prove him innocent.
Comprende? Kapish?
You don't seem to understand that. It's pretty damn simple.
So, I guess that would make YOU the tool.
 
Back
Top