countryboy
Verified User
Lol, yeah, because Russian mob money always shows up on tax returns.
trump Loses more than any other American
- Thread starter katzgar
- Start date
Lol, yeah, because Russian mob money always shows up on tax returns.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
Don’t have to read it
Already know what it says. In fact much of what is in it was leaked by Mueller.
How is your JPP lawsuit coming? Billy is still a Mod if you didn’t know.
Did you learn to start threads in the right forum? Have you bent the knee
So what will show up on his tax returns?
Too scared, you mean.
Too scared because of what it means for your personal judgment.
So, you know it says that the only reason Mueller didn't indict Trump was because of the OLC guidelines, and that once Trump leaves office, those guidelines no longer apply?
What're your thoughts on that?
It's not that I started threads in the wrong forum, it's that the threads I started unbalanced you all emotionally that you felt compelled to troll me because you ran out of tactics to defend your shitty beliefs.
countryboy
Verified User
Yeah, I read it. Did you? So what. Where does it mention Russian mob money?
That's not what Mueller said.
Here's his report; cite the passage where it says that.
From Mueller, not from the other 14 open investigations.
America's Least Popular Senator is obstructing justice too.
Yes, actually...but they couldn't bring charges because of OLC guidelines, as Mueller says right here, in the report you refuse to read because you are a coward:
First, a traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to
initiate or decline a prosecution, but we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial
judgment. The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) has issued an opinion finding that "the indictment
or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the
executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions" in violation of "the
constitutional separation of powers."1 Given the role of the Special Counsel as an attorney in the
Department of Justice and the framework of the Special Counsel regulations, see 28 U.S.C. § 515;
28 C.F.R. § 600.7(a), this Office accepted OLC's legal conclusion for the purpose of exercising
prosecutorial jurisdiction. And apart from OLC's constitutional view, we recognized that a federal
criminal accusation against a sitting President would place burdens on the President's capacity to
govern and potentially preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct.2
Oops. How damaging to your argument.
countryboy
Verified User
Nunya. What else? The IRS audits Trump's returns every year. Are you suggesting they wouldn't have found tax fraud after all these years? And what about Mueller and his merry band of Trump hating Democrats?
You read it?
What do you make of this, then:
First, a traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to initiate or decline a prosecution, but we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment. The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) has issued an opinion finding that "the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions" in violation of "the constitutional separation of powers."1 Given the role of the Special Counsel as an attorney in the Department of Justice and the framework of the Special Counsel regulations, see 28 U.S.C. § 515; 28 C.F.R. § 600.7(a), this Office accepted OLC's legal conclusion for the purpose of exercising prosecutorial jurisdiction. And apart from OLC's constitutional view, we recognized that a federal criminal accusation against a sitting President would place burdens on the President's capacity to govern and potentially preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct.2
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf
You're afraid of Trump's tax returns being made public because they'll reveal you got tricked, conned, and fooled by a broke loser and your ego cannot handle it.
No they don't.
He lied about that.
You fell for the lie because your judgment is poor.
I'm suggesting Trump hasn't been under audit, and that he lied about being under audit as an excuse to not release his taxes, which would reveal he's a broke fraud that tricked morons like you into voting for him.
Here's what Mueller actually said:
First, a traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to
initiate or decline a prosecution, but we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial
judgment. The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) has issued an opinion finding that "the indictment
or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the
executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions" in violation of "the
constitutional separation of powers."1 Given the role of the Special Counsel as an attorney in the
Department of Justice and the framework of the Special Counsel regulations, see 28 U.S.C. § 515;
28 C.F.R. § 600.7(a), this Office accepted OLC's legal conclusion for the purpose of exercising
prosecutorial jurisdiction. And apart from OLC's constitutional view, we recognized that a federal
criminal accusation against a sitting President would place burdens on the President's capacity to
govern and potentially preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct.2
What does that mean? Use your words.
"1 Given the role of the Special Counsel as an attorney in the Department of Justice and the framework of the Special Counsel regulations, see 28 U.S.C. § 515; 28 C.F.R. § 600.7(a), this Office accepted OLC's legal conclusion for the purpose of exercising prosecutorial jurisdiction."
The Attorney General could have recommended indictment and he did not.
Case closed...per the Senate Majority Leader, McConnell.
The Attorney General could have recommended indictment and he did not.
Case closed...per the Senate Majority Leader, McConnell.