Trump owes the FBI an apology.

Done damage to the entire Judicial system, along with the intelligence services and our election traditions

Yes, the Obama Administration and the Justice Department along with the PHONY media and the Party of the Jackass have done, and are doing, irreparable damage to our election systems and our government institutions.
 
Durham is 100% political,............. blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah

Read my signature you insufferable dunce. :rolleyes:
 
HE does not seem to know that, and he does not want to end up like Sessions did. Trust me, the president believes Barr works for him, and as you know the President can fire him.

Read my signature you dishonest, hypocritical hack. :rolleyes:
 
You kidding, your media is pulling out all the stops attemting to change the narrative, to discredit the IG report, it is humorous especially when you have individuals as Wray coming out and endorsing the report

His media? How fucking dimwitted are you? :laugh:
 
Last edited:
So ALL THE ILLEGAL FISA ABUSES WERE JUST "ACCIDENTS"?


Horowitz, in true OBAMA ADM. LEFTOVER FORM, did what he could to cover for his buds. while being FORCED TO REVEAL THE DAMNING FACTS.

There were no abuses. Horowitz was hand chosen by Barr to do this investigation, you fool.
 
Funny, how people see themselves differently than others, you may not have gone full Hannity, but you did think it was going to be a bomb shell that discredited the FBI, Steele and Mueller.
no. the example was set with the Hillary Email report where he found bias but COULD NOT DOCUMENT working bias.

same thing here..but what is notable is the push back on that from Durham and Barr..they would not issue such a statement unless they had a clear rebuttal of both the predicate and the political bias being flawed
 
There were no abuses. Horowitz was hand chosen by Barr to do this investigation, you fool.

HOROWITZ was the IG DUMBFUCK, AND BARR and DURHAM BOTH HAVE PENLY ESPRESSED THEIR DISAGREEMENT WITH HIS BULLSHIT "CONCLUSIONS".


. Barr CHOSE DURHAM to do the REAL INVESTIGATION.

THERE WERE MULTIPLE ABUSES, or CAN'T YOU READ?





"...the long-awaited report by the Justice Department's inspector general ... the report reflected a “clear abuse” of the wiretap application process. ... "


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/09/us/politics/fbi-ig-report-russia-investigation.html
 
Barr supervises the second report, so its his. Horowitz was independent. Which do you think is more truthful, the one written by an employee of Trump, or the independent guy?


Hahahahahahaha

Nice try lol.

In an absurd hyper-technical sense, it’s ‘Barr’s report’ but Barr had nothing to do with it. When Barr actually reports, we’ll discuss his report. Durham’s report, actually.

Who has the more *accurate* conclusion, remains to be seen. For now, the ‘happy face spin’ is the FBI did some pretty shoddy work leading up to the Trump-Russian investigation.

Btw, if these government agencies were aware that the Steele Dossier was junk, why was it allowed to hang like a cloud over the first two years of the Trump administration?

They wanted to make sure Trump’s poll numbers stayed down? Wouldn’t that be domestic election meddling—on steroids? Wait a minute, it would be using Russian disinformation to keep a duly elected President’s poll numbers down. That would make it easier to impeach him, wouldn’t it.

Do you goof balls have any idea how bad this could end?
 
no. the example was set with the Hillary Email report where he found bias but COULD NOT DOCUMENT working bias.

same thing here..but what is notable is the push back on that from Durham and Barr..they would not issue such a statement unless they had a clear rebuttal of both the predicate and the political bias being flawed
Indeed.
 
and we all know what your opinions are worth

but on the subject
one of the worse things a congress can do is put national security at risk because they can't seem to get over a democratic election result.

and that's exactly what they are doing, and what the American people see

trump is the President, has to deal with world leaders on issues we have no idea the extent of, and for these leaders to make decisions based on trumps word, while witnessing his own people ridiculing him, calling him a liar and a corrupt leader not only stymies those negotiations, but very well may lead to something catastrophic for the country. We live in dangerous times, we need a focused, legitimate leader at the helm

but thanks for your concern of country, goofy bitch

That is such a lame line, "can't get over election results," you can't get over Americans elected a black President, twice, in both large electoral college and popular vote results

Want to ping ping another inanity.
 
I am very skeptical of what Barr or Durham have to say, because if these two men had any integrity they wouldn't be working for a scum bucket the likes of Trump.
Barr works for the American people, Durham works for the people of NY and assists Barr...when asked.

Get a clue, Trumper.
 
That is such a lame line, "can't get over election results," you can't get over Americans elected a black President, twice, in both large electoral college and popular vote results

Want to ping ping another inanity.
Who elected Obama...whites?
 
trump is the President, has to deal with world leaders ... for these leaders to make decisions based on trumps word ...

Anyone who made a decision based on Trump's word would have to be a fool. Most world leaders are not fools. They know what to make of Trump's word (and his judgment).

We live in dangerous times, we need a focused, legitimate leader at the helm.

Correct. When are we going to get one?
 
Barr works for the American people, Durham works for the people of NY and assists Barr...when asked.

Get a clue, Trumper.

Earl, get the rocks out of your head, Barr is Trump's lackey Gestapo Chief, who is ready to fabricate evidence to frame Trump's political enemies.
 
Back
Top