Memo and national security

so... how does the memo compromise national security?

You mean warnings from the FBI and the Justice Department aren't enough?

Putin has won.

It compromises collections systems and processes that our intelligence agencies use to monitor our adversaries.

It told the Russians just how and when Carter Page was monitored.

Those who now don't want to believe the FBI won't.

Putin wins.
 
You mean warnings from the FBI and the Justice Department aren't enough?

You mean warnings from the people implicated in the scandal who didn't want their conduct exposed, don't you?

And spare me your faux concerns for the credibility of the FBI. Haven't you and your little ho stated repeatedly that the DoJ is is a racist tool of the white devils?
 
so... how does the memo compromise national security?

You'd have to ask Director Wray that question, but ultimately, as someone once said, "what difference does it make," the memo is a bust, and embarrassing bust, even I'm disappointed, no theater
 
You'd have to ask Director Wray that question, but ultimately, as someone once said, "what difference does it make," the memo is a bust, and embarrassing bust, even I'm disappointed, no theater

A complete and total BUST. Another 'secret society.'

Republicans have proven themselves incapable of leading.

Cowered into a corner by a clown.
 
As usual, non response and non answer. Nothing but insult.

Do you believe it will effect national security?

He is a total troll, fool.

For all your attention whoring, distractions and otherwise idiocy you still have 500 times the value he does.

Trump is the main threat to national security.
 
You mean warnings from the FBI and the Justice Department aren't enough?

Putin has won.

It compromises collections systems and processes that our intelligence agencies use to monitor our adversaries.

It told the Russians just how and when Carter Page was monitored.

Those who now don't want to believe the FBI won't.

Putin wins.

That all sounds nice lol.

But the subject of the Memo was the Dossier and how it was used to *mislead* the FISA court. And now we know the Dossier’s primary intent was for a political purpose: to disrupt Trump’s campaign and enable Hillary to win.

Which would be fine, if that’s as far as it went. Dirt-digging is as old as politics.

But the FBI picked it up, and despite the fact the then-Director testified under oath that it was ‘salacious and unverified’ the Dossier was used as a basis to wiretap a US citizen. What would the Russians learn from that?

Apart from the fact we allow government agencies to ignore the 4th Amendment, if it serves a political purpose. They do that sort of thing in Russia—but Russians don’t have a 4th Amendment.

Be specific; and no mumbo-jumbo about compromising collections systems. Whatever that means lol.
 
You mean warnings from the FBI and the Justice Department aren't enough?

Putin has won.

It compromises collections systems and processes that our intelligence agencies use to monitor our adversaries.

It told the Russians just how and when Carter Page was monitored.

Those who now don't want to believe the FBI won't.

Putin wins.

what collections systems and processes? The FISA court? Its existence is known theres kind of a law for it.. It was known that Page was originally surveilled in 2013 htough it was not renewed due to lack of evidence.

Lack of trust in FBI? Should all their wrongdoings be kept secret then?
 
That all sounds nice lol.

But the subject of the Memo was the Dossier and how it was used to *mislead* the FISA court. And now we know the Dossier’s primary intent was for a political purpose: to disrupt Trump’s campaign and enable Hillary to win.

Which would be fine, if that’s as far as it went. Dirt-digging is as old as politics.

But the FBI picked it up, and despite the fact the then-Director testified under oath that it was ‘salacious and unverified’ the Dossier was used as a basis to wiretap a US citizen. What would the Russians learn from that?

Apart from the fact we allow government agencies to ignore the 4th Amendment, if it serves a political purpose.

Be specific; and no mumbo-jumbo about compromising collections systems. Whatever that means lol.

I'm sorry, but that ONLY works in TrumpyWorld.

FISA used FAR more than the dossier to make judgement about monitoring an individual they had been monitoring since 2013.

Your argument is ridiculous and purely partisan .. and if more than Nunes footnotes had been revealed, you would already know that.
 
Back
Top