Eagle_Eye
Well-known member
A little extreme but funny.I am, IMO. If the mother-to-be is a DEMOCRAT, I believe I should have the right, nay, the obligation to terminate the pregnancy and the host organism with extreme prejudice.![]()
A little extreme but funny.I am, IMO. If the mother-to-be is a DEMOCRAT, I believe I should have the right, nay, the obligation to terminate the pregnancy and the host organism with extreme prejudice.![]()
One of the drawbacks though would be that unwanted 18-year-olds would be running for their lives. That's what I would call a truly "liberal" policy!
Row V Wade has been the law for nearly 50 years. Medical science has made tremendous advances in medicine in that time.
Abortion becomes a moral and legal issue when a fetus reaches a certain stage, per the laws enacted by politicians.
Instead of politicians deciding when a woman can or cannot have an abortion, how about letting the medical community decide at which point an abortion is manslaughter? Take the politics out of the formula. Let the decision be between a woman and her doctor based on AMA rulings.

they are supposed to use science and other professionals to make proper decisions.
Law always lags behind science.
Row V Wade has been the law for nearly 50 years. Medical science has made tremendous advances in medicine in that time.
Abortion becomes a moral and legal issue when a fetus reaches a certain stage, per the laws enacted by politicians.
RInstead of politicians deciding when a woman can or cannot have an abortion, how about letting the medical community decide at which point an abortion is manslaughter? Take the politics out of the formula. Let the decision be between a woman and her doctor based on AMA rulings.
'God's Law'. The Religious Quacks claim it is God's Law.
Or you right wing nuts stop telling women what do with their own lives and bodies.

Have you noticed that they never apply "My body, my choice" to vaccine mandates?
Their god’s law carries no weight in our courts.

That's because they are lying hypocrites with massive double standards.
They must think everyone else are just as stupid as they seem to be.
Viability can be as early as 20 weeks as per medical science.
As I have stated multiple times, it changes nothing since most abortions are done within 10 weeks anyway.

... unless Moscow Mitch and FagBoy Lindsey stack the Courts with Religious Quacks.![]()
Then why all the angst from the left about laws that say after 15 or 25 weeks? The Mississippi case is about a law that states no abortion after 15 weeks.
If you were dealing with facts and reality, the Democrats and the ir leftist minions don't believe in ANY restrictions.![]()
Why are we talking about vaccine? Take it elsewhere, dumbass. Take your whataboutism and shove it up your ass.

Ra-men, Brother Eagle, ra-men.

Deal. Instead, we'll just tell you lepers to stay home. You know, like you covidiots all said to us norms last year when governments mandated masks and social distancing to keep you fools alive.

Abortion should be mandatory for all unintended pregnancies.
Pregnancies should require, on an individual basis, licensing by a government board of family planning experts.
If a mother insists on carrying an accidental baby full term,
the baby should be confiscated by social services and both biological parents should be heavily fined if not incarcerated.
Who could argue with logical reasoning like that? Certainly nobody who isn't intellectually and morally deficient, right?