Then why all the angst from the left about laws that say after 15 or 25 weeks?
You know why.
Then why all the angst from the left about laws that say after 15 or 25 weeks?
Einstein. What's wrong with letting the woman make the Decision?
'God's Law'. The Religious Quacks claim it is God's Law.

I am, IMO. If the mother-to-be is a DEMOCRAT, I believe I should have the right, nay, the obligation to terminate the pregnancy and the host organism with extreme prejudice.![]()

'God's Law'. The Religious Quacks claim it is God's Law.
Their god’s law carries no weight in our courts.
Priceless! Dumbest and Dumb Fuck in an echo chamber.
Because it is amoral when the fetus is a viable human being and using abortion for birth control is heinous and murder.
Let me ask you; if a man punches a pregnant woman hard in the stomach causing her unborn child to die, can he be charged with murder? If so, how is the abortion on demand argument even relevant?
So political affiliation is genetic.
^Doesn't think he is the "quack."![]()
I have no idea .....

As I have stated many times, it changes nothing as most abortions are done within 15 weeks anyway.

Is that what I said?
So political affiliation is genetic. Who knew?![]()

So political affiliation is genetic. Who knew?![]()
Dumbest and Dumb Fuck in an echo chamber.
You implied it. " If the mother-to-be is a DEMOCRAT, I believe I should have the right, nay, the obligation to terminate the pregnancy and the host organism with extreme prejudice. "
You may be right, but still her choice.
Probably whether the woman wants the fetus or not.

You implied it.
So true.
The debate isn't about YOU. Or your OPINION. It's about the conniptions the left and Party of the Jackass are having over Roe vs Wade. If, as you opine, it changes nothing, why all the angst?![]()

This is why some of us come to JPP. ... exposure to the low end of the gene pool.

Doesn't think