Abrego Garcia is still out on the streets.

Nordberg said:
If he were a criminal, they could charge him and put him on trial. They have not because they have nothing. This is all show. Who could argue if he was found guilty of crimes and deported?
Click to expand...

Jarod said:
They never had any evidence of him being in a gang or committing any crimes they told the judge about.
Click to expand...

Jake Starkey said:
T. A. you shifting paths reflects the weakness of your argumentative skills and position.

The courts' decisions count, and your disagreement is merely opinion without merit.
Click to expand...

QP! said:
no one cares about Magat rantings Terry and that you think the process should be different than it is.

The court process that was followed IS THE CORRECT process and you saying 'if they rule a way we do not like it is wrong and invalid' is just the rantings of a magat idiot.

That is the way the system is designed to work and if a judge makes a ruling that you do not like then there are MULTPLE avenues of appeal. If it turns out the judges ruling was incorrect, it will be reversed but that DOES NOT mean he was wrong to intervene in the way he did. He is allowed to be wrong as that is part of the system and why appeals exist.
Click to expand...
Your boy is getting deported to Liberia. Deal with it. :awesome:

trump-shades.gif
 
QP! said:
Not caring is a statement and not an opinion.

It is FACT that the court process that was followed is as the system is DESIGNED PURPOSELY so Judges can have a say and make rulings (right or wrong) in this process.

This case followed the system EXACTLY as it was meant to be and if the judge ruled what you wanted you would applaud him but as a magat when they rule against you cry and act like they violated the system when THEY DID NOT.

You label any ruling against the outcome you want abuse and i can probably find at least 3 other active rulings against Trump where you cry the same thing of 'activist judges who should not be ruling' when the FACT IS they absolutely should be ruling regardless of whether you or I hate the outcome.

That is what a system provides. And again why there is a multi level appeal process to prove this judges ruling as the incorrect interpretation, if it is.

What that does not mean is the judge was wrong to make it. If a case is brought to them, as this was, the judge must hear both sides and read the statutes and do their best to interpret the law. Most times they get it correct but sometimes they get it wrong and the appellate court reverses and that is EXACTLY how the system is supposed to work. They are NOT activist judges simply because Terry disagrees, even if an appellate court was to reverse the judge as getting it occasionally wrong is part of the process to which is why the appellate process exists.
Click to expand...
Actually, the judges have been getting overruled on this left and right.

worldtribune.com

U.S. appeals court halts Judge Boasberg’s ‘improper investigation’ of Trump decision-making

by WorldTribune Staff, April 17, 2026 Non-AI Real World News A federal appeals court rebuked U.S. District Judge James Boasberg on April 14 and ordered him to halt his criminal contempt of court in…
worldtribune.com worldtribune.com

talkingpointsmemo.com

Major Ruling Offers Due Process to Alien Enemies Act Detainees

Morning Memo Live! Join me Jan. 29 in Washington, D.C., for our...
talkingpointsmemo.com

www.linkedin.com

Appellate Court Slaps Down Judge Boasberg's Harassment of the Department of Justice

The following article is the most recent post from my blog The Appellate Spectator at www.appellatespectator.
www.linkedin.com www.linkedin.com

Now it's gone in front of a second district court judge Xinis and she's poised to get a smackdown too.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Actually, the judges have been getting overruled on this left and right.

worldtribune.com

U.S. appeals court halts Judge Boasberg’s ‘improper investigation’ of Trump decision-making

by WorldTribune Staff, April 17, 2026 Non-AI Real World News A federal appeals court rebuked U.S. District Judge James Boasberg on April 14 and ordered him to halt his criminal contempt of court in…
worldtribune.com worldtribune.com

talkingpointsmemo.com

Major Ruling Offers Due Process to Alien Enemies Act Detainees

Morning Memo Live! Join me Jan. 29 in Washington, D.C., for our...
talkingpointsmemo.com

www.linkedin.com

Appellate Court Slaps Down Judge Boasberg's Harassment of the Department of Justice

The following article is the most recent post from my blog The Appellate Spectator at www.appellatespectator.
www.linkedin.com www.linkedin.com

Now it's gone in front of a second district court judge Xinis and she's poised to get a smackdown too.
Click to expand...
A judge being over ruled is part of the process as designed.

What it DOES NOT mean is the judge was an activist or wrong to hear the case brought to them or rule on it as you WRONGLY keep saying.

What you are saying is stupid and you are stupid.

You pointing to cases over ruled makes the point the process works and is proceeding EXACTLY as it was devised to work.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
YOU don't care. Don't foist your opinion off as if it's everyone's.


No, the process is being abused and abused badly. There is ZERO reason for Garcia to still be in the US. He was and is deportable. Deport him. It's that simple. He has no genuine claim to asylum or some other process. He's used up his appeals. Deport him. The ONLY reason he isn't already gone is that several federal judges who HATE Trump, with a capital hate, are abusing federal law to keep him here as a political tool for their own benefit.
Click to expand...
Most of America looks wide eyed at MAGA rantings and knows it nothing more than flatulence in the universal scheme of things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
Where does trump's administration and the courts stand with Abrego Garcia's deportation?

Some nonsense is floating around about Abrego Garcia.

Courts have repeatedly blocked or slowed deportation efforts, ordered his return, and expressed concern about the government’s conduct.

The short version: Trump’s administration has repeatedly pushed to deport Kilmar Abrego Garcia despite multiple court orders blocking or complicating those efforts, while the courts have largely acted as a brake—ordering his return, blocking new removal attempts, and questioning the government’s actions. Below is a clear, sourced breakdown of where things stand.

Across 2025–2026, the administration has consistently taken the position that:

  • Abrego Garcia should be deported, first to El Salvador and later to a series of African countries such as Liberia and Uganda.
  • The administration has accused him of MS‑13 affiliation, despite his denials and despite a 2019 immigration judge ruling that he could not be deported to El Salvador due to danger from gangs.
  • After mistakenly deporting him to El Salvador in March 2025—despite a court order barring it—the administration argued that the deportation was an “administrative error” but maintained he remained under a final order of removal.
  • Even after the Supreme Court ordered the government to “facilitate” his return, the administration interpreted that narrowly, arguing it did not require them to secure his release from Salvadoran custody.
  • Once he was returned to the U.S., the administration indicted him for human smuggling, which his attorneys argue was retaliatory.
  • As of March 2026, the administration has stated it is ready to deport him to Liberia and has asked the court to lift the injunction preventing removal.
Bottom line: The administration continues to pursue deportation aggressively and as quickly as courts will allow.

The courts—immigration, federal district, and the Supreme Court—have repeatedly intervened:

  • A Maryland immigration judge ruled he could not be deported to El Salvador due to credible danger from gangs.
  • March 2025: Despite that ruling, ICE mistakenly deported him to El Salvador.
  • April 10, 2025: The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ordered the administration to “facilitate” his return to the U.S.
  • July–December 2025: A federal judge in Maryland issued injunctions blocking further deportation attempts, including attempts to send him to African countries.
    • December 11, 2025: Judge ordered ICE to immediately release him.
    • February 17, 2026: Judge ruled ICE cannot re‑detain him.
  • Judges have questioned the DOJ’s push to deport him while his criminal case is still pending, signaling skepticism about the government’s urgency.
  • As of March 2026, Judge Paula Xinis has not lifted the injunction preventing deportation to Liberia, though the administration is pressing her to do so.
Bottom line: Courts have repeatedly blocked or slowed deportation efforts, ordered his return, and expressed concern about the government’s conduct.
  • Abrego Garcia is in the U.S., not in immigration detention, due to court orders.
  • He is facing criminal charges in Tennessee (human smuggling), which he denies.
  • The Trump administration is actively seeking to deport him to Liberia, but cannot do so unless the federal injunction is lifted.
  • A federal judge has paused some proceedings while considering the government’s latest deportation request.

apnews.com/article/abrego-garcia-ice-immigration-deportation-trump-2950610fea00caf717087ea0ac3bdf6d?utm_source=copilot.com

www.aol.com/articles/timeline-wrongful-deportation-kilmar-abrego-033400414.html?utm_source=copilot.com

www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-administration-asks-judge-to-lift-order-blocking-kilmar-abrego-garcias-deportation/?utm_source=copilot.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
Jarod said:
So they keep this “dangerous man” free on the streets of America?
Click to expand...
Yes he is so dangerous and so obviously guilty as Trump DoJ and magats like @T. A. Gardner have proclaimed and yet the Trump DoJ is not even trying to bring a case against him.

They could let this dangerous man self deport and protect American citizens from him but instead they choose to let him walk free with any crime he does on them because they refuse to let him self deport to costa Rica. Why?

Because they are petty and evil. It is not enough that he be out of America and they need to send him to some war torn despot country across the ocean with no money or ID, where they can bribe the locals to arrest him.

There is no reason to block him self deporting, NONE, other than it's an end to the Garcia case that is not the worst case outcome they want.
 
QP! said:
Yes he is so dangerous and so obviously guilty as Trump DoJ and magats like @T. A. Gardner have proclaimed and yet the Trump DoJ is not even trying to bring a case against him.

They could let this dangerous man self deport and protect American citizens from him but instead they choose to let him walk free with any crime he does on them because they refuse to let him self deport to costa Rica. Why?

Because they are petty and evil. It is not enough that he be out of America and they need to send him to some war torn despot country across the ocean with no money or ID, where they can bribe the locals to arrest him.

There is no reason to block him self deporting, NONE, other than it's an end to the Garcia case that is not the worst case outcome they want.
Click to expand...
I never "proclaimed" that Garcia is "dangerous." I've consistently said he is in the US illegally, has a final order of deportation against him, has no valid claim to asylum, and should be deported.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I never "proclaimed" that Garcia is "dangerous." I've consistently said he is in the US illegally, has a final order of deportation against him, has no valid claim to asylum, and should be deported.
Click to expand...
Don't make me expose your lies again.

Over and over you have stated him to be a member of MS13 as if fact.

So unless you are going to try and weasel now and say you meant 'the friendly non violent arm', you were ALWAYS aserting he was dangerous.
 
QP! said:
Over and over you have stated him to be a member of MS13 as if fact.
Click to expand...

The courts said so, I just stated what they stated.
QP! said:
So unless you are going to try and weasel now and say you meant 'the friendly non violent arm', you were ALWAYS aserting he was dangerous.
Click to expand...

I wasn't asserting he's "dangerous." He certainly is a wife beater so I guess he's dangerous in that respect. In any case, I don't care if he is or not. I care that he's deported because he shouldn't be in the US, PERIOD!
 
T. A. Gardner said:
The courts said so, I just stated what they stated.


I wasn't asserting he's "dangerous." He certainly is a wife beater so I guess he's dangerous in that respect. In any case, I don't care if he is or not. I care that he's deported because he shouldn't be in the US, PERIOD!
Click to expand...
Lie.

You would assert it as if fact when he has never had a trial.

You would make statements that he "IS" MS13 as if adjudicated proven fact, etc.
 
The entire legal system is under Trump's control. He has shown hwo wil buse the power
T. A. Gardner said:
The courts said so, I just stated what they stated.


I wasn't asserting he's "dangerous." He certainly is a wife beater so I guess he's dangerous in that respect. In any case, I don't care if he is or not. I care that he's deported because he shouldn't be in the US, PERIOD!
Click to expand...
Not interested in your periods. He does have protection from being deported. He is legally safe from deportation. If Trump's justice dept had anything on him, he would be gone and you would be happy,
 
QP! said:
Don't make me expose your lies again.

Over and over you have stated him to be a member of MS13 as if fact.

So unless you are going to try and weasel now and say you meant 'the friendly non violent arm', you were ALWAYS aserting he was dangerous.
Click to expand...

Jake Starkey said:
Are the authorities not permitting him to self-deport?
Click to expand...

QP! said:
Lie.

You would assert it as if fact when he has never had a trial.

You would make statements that he "IS" MS13 as if adjudicated proven fact, etc.
Click to expand...

Nordberg said:
The entire legal system is under Trump's control. He has shown hwo wil buse the power
Not interested in your periods. He does have protection from being deported. He is legally safe from deportation. If Trump's justice dept had anything on him, he would be gone and you would be happy,
Click to expand...

Taichiliberal said:
You can't make this stuff up!
Click to expand...
https://twitter.com/x/status/1911831024041971843
View: https://x.com/kellytx2/status/1911831024041971843?s=20
Oh, it's coming. :awesome:
www.aljazeera.com

Trump administration reaffirms plans to deport Abrego Garcia to Liberia

Abrego Garcia's wrongful removal in 2025 has spurred criticism of the Trump administration's mass deportation campaign.
www.aljazeera.com www.aljazeera.com
He's going to Liberia.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top