No answer to the post? why the need for the lawyer? the other comments are based on specifics...
*‘
No answer to the post? why the need for the lawyer? the other comments are based on specifics...
*‘
National Review was founded by William F. Buckley. It has been at the forefront of conservative thought for multiple decades. It was also one of the leading voices speaking out against Trump prior to the election and during his Presidency. You're obviously free to disagree with what NR writes and supports but hacks they are not.
You sure do. Now, go ahead and post something that matters.
Such as Trump’s pathological lying and abuse of his office.
Prediction: A gullible pussy of your magnitude won’t![]()

This what they wrote: "Smollett now says he fought back, but apparently he lost neither his Subway sandwich nor his cell phone in this brawl." And what I'm asking is where is the proof of this statement?
They seem to be saying that it's a given those things would be lost.
But I thought you said it was no big deal.![]()

It is, dumbfuck. Get back to me in a couple months and see if anyone gives a fuck.
Meanwhile, keep denying the lying bullshit that Orangetweet feeds you.
Fucking loser.![]()
No, really...why would he need a defense lawyer ?Go back and read post 30...
Then maybe you can explain why the MSM seems to say you're incorrect.

No, really...why would he need a defense lawyer ?
Pull your little tit out of the wringer, pussy.
Try to face the REAL issues rather some publicity stunt.
Gullible dumbfuck.![]()
Why does he?Why would Trump need several?
How does that make them hacks? I honestly don't know or care tbh about what happened at Subway. The story is interesting to me in that it's national news but I don't care if he had a sandwich or didn't.
No, really...why would he need a defense lawyer ?
Why does he?

I did.... Let me repeat...why does he need a high powered defense attorney (to prove that he's not lying/it wasn't staged) People who are truthful don't need attorneys..If you're not going to address my actual words then don't bother responding.
‘Why does he? You brought it up. this isn't about the President....You tell us, moron. He claims he’s an innocent victim. You morons are asking why victims need lawyers, yet you can’t answer that for your liar-in-chief.
Gullible morons![]()
This site and other RW sites have been on overdrive trying to prove that Smollett faked the attack, and they use the uncorroborated bit about the sandwich as an attempt to say if he really was attacked he would have lost the sandwich and the phone.
You're conservative... why is this such an issue with conservatives? Why are cons so hell-bent on making Smollett out as a liar? I don't get it.