Jussie Smollett Hires Defense Attorney

National Review was founded by William F. Buckley. It has been at the forefront of conservative thought for multiple decades. It was also one of the leading voices speaking out against Trump prior to the election and during his Presidency. You're obviously free to disagree with what NR writes and supports but hacks they are not.

This what they wrote: "Smollett now says he fought back, but apparently he lost neither his Subway sandwich nor his cell phone in this brawl." And what I'm asking is where is the proof of this statement?

They seem to be saying that it's a given those things would be lost.
 
This what they wrote: "Smollett now says he fought back, but apparently he lost neither his Subway sandwich nor his cell phone in this brawl." And what I'm asking is where is the proof of this statement?

They seem to be saying that it's a given those things would be lost.

How does that make them hacks? I honestly don't know or care tbh about what happened at Subway. The story is interesting to me in that it's national news but I don't care if he had a sandwich or didn't.
 
How does that make them hacks? I honestly don't know or care tbh about what happened at Subway. The story is interesting to me in that it's national news but I don't care if he had a sandwich or didn't.

This site and other RW sites have been on overdrive trying to prove that Smollett faked the attack, and they use the uncorroborated bit about the sandwich as an attempt to say if he really was attacked he would have lost the sandwich and the phone.

You're conservative... why is this such an issue with conservatives? Why are cons so hell-bent on making Smollett out as a liar? I don't get it.
 
If you're not going to address my actual words then don't bother responding.
I did.... Let me repeat...why does he need a high powered defense attorney (to prove that he's not lying/it wasn't staged) People who are truthful don't need attorneys..
It's been 2 weeks ...what do you think the holdup is?
 
You tell us, moron. He claims he’s an innocent victim. You morons are asking why victims need lawyers, yet you can’t answer that for your liar-in-chief.

Gullible morons :rofl2:
‘Why does he? You brought it up. this isn't about the President....
 
This site and other RW sites have been on overdrive trying to prove that Smollett faked the attack, and they use the uncorroborated bit about the sandwich as an attempt to say if he really was attacked he would have lost the sandwich and the phone.

You're conservative... why is this such an issue with conservatives? Why are cons so hell-bent on making Smollett out as a liar? I don't get it.

What was the original story? A gay black man was jumped/assualted by two white Trump supporters with a hang noose, bleach and yelled "#maga, this is Trump country" at him. I mean that's some pretty bad sh*t. It rightfully made national news and yes it made Trump and Trump supporters look very bad.

Well now we have this new info that the attack could possibly have been staged or something else going on other than what Smollett originally told the police. I'm not hell bent on proving the guy a liar, I'm just discussing what's being reported in the news. But I think it should be pretty obvious if this turns out to be false why Trump supporters would want it to be known.
 
Back
Top