Liberals, You’re Not as Smart as You Think

That wouldn't fly in ninth grade debate.
that's like me saying:

Obama is dirt because I say so and anybody who argues against me is stupid. :rolleyes:
OK, whatever you say , Frank.

Whatever.

Your support for the abomination, Donald Trump...and for the American conservative agenda is noted.

As I said above...I think your side is going to prevail.

I lament that with every bone in my body...and with every thought that passes through my mind.
 
You hear that everyone: don't be mean to conservatives and discredit their ideas, otherwise they won't vote for you.

The left is trying something radical for 2018 and 2020; writing off Trump voters and concentrating on non-voters.

Trump voters, Republicans, and Conservatives should be ignored by the Democrats. They don't need those groups to win, as AL proved. All Democrats need to do is increase voter turnout. Why try to "moderate" in order to attract racists, bigots, malcontents, and economic losers?

Fuck Trump. Fuck Trump voters. Fuck Republicans. Fuck Conservatives.

We don't want the votes of traitors.
 
You know what's spot on in this article? The charges of racism. The author is right, no one (almost no one) wants to be called a racist. But it's used as a political weapon to bludgeon people and try to shu them up. You see it on this board you see it around the country. It turns people off

Then stop supporting racism and saying racist shit.

It's simple.
 
Whatever.

Your support for the abomination, Donald Trump...and for the American conservative agenda is noted.

As I said above...I think your side is going to prevail.

I lament that with every bone in my body...and with every thought that passes through my mind.

He claims he didn't vote for dump and he's a liberal........shrugging shoulders.
 
You hear that everyone: don't be mean to conservatives and discredit their ideas, otherwise they won't vote for you.The left is trying something radical for 2018 and 2020; writing off Trump voters and concentrating on non-voters.

Trump voters, Republicans, and Conservatives should be ignored by the Democrats. They don't need those groups to win, as AL proved. All Democrats need to do is increase voter turnout. Why try to "moderate" in order to attract racists, bigots, malcontents, and economic losers?

Fuck Trump. Fuck Trump voters. Fuck Republicans. Fuck Conservatives.

We don't want the votes of traitors.

Been saying this for years. They aren't voting for you anyway. Neither are most independents. I agree, fuck em.

They tried to say this election they didn't court "middle America" and middle America stayed home. ......puff, Hilary had 5 million more voters, who cares if those undecided (really republicans) stayed home. Why the fuck would any real dem vote for racist republican policies?
 
The article is good. I think more than half the people on here commenting on it have not read it. The gist of the article is that if liberals do not start acting like they used too instead of consistently whining about Hillary losing, the will almost ensure a re-election of Trump. The Professor who wrote it does not want that. He is trying to stop that.

It's not liberals whining, it' conservatives whining.

You fellow conservative just posted the dem's agenda so he totally contradicts what you just posted.
 
Whatever.

Your support for the abomination, Donald Trump...
At this point in time, yes, I support Trump because there is no real alternative. You have yet to come up with one.
We had one in Gary Johnson who I voted for and I still believe would be a good one
.and for the American conservative agenda is noted.
Not totally. I have an open mind. It's why I now support what Trump's doing. i have an open mind.
As far as my support for "the American conservative agenda" does this post of mine support that?

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...nt-burner-for-Democrats&p=2371699#post2371699
Other bills would allow individuals and, in some cases, employers to buy into a Medicare plan, which would compete with private sector options, and expand subsidies in the Affordable Care Act to help finance coverage. But the overall direction is clear: A robust, universally available, government health care plan.

“The conversation is not about whether Medicare for All is a good thing or not, but rather what’s the best way to get us there, which is a radically different place than where we were during the fight over the Affordable Care Act,” Stephanie Taylor, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, told NBC News.
I'm good with that. Sounds similar to my Moosecare.
The hottest new topic in progressive circles is a proposal, backed by several of the Senate’s big names, to enlist the federal government to guarantee jobs for the jobless.
Very, very stupid. It also guarantees jobs for those that don't feel like working.
requiring corporations to help pay for government benefits if their employees qualify for programs like food stamps.
I like that. that's thinking outside the box.
They’re pushing Democrats to take a tougher stand against Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the agency that handles interior enforcement, and some Customs and Border Protection practices as well.
A tougher stand against existing laws? Ass backwards. I thought legislators' jobs were to make, repeal or change laws, not break them.


As I said above...I think your side is going to prevail.

I lament that with every bone in my body...and with every thought that passes through my mind.
Don't worry Frank. My side has never prevailed nor de we ever expect it to.
8. We’re not trying to win elections
Any libertarian who tells you he is trying to win an election is either lying to you about trying to win the election, lying to us about being a libertarian, or terribly misinformed. As far as we’re concerned, elections are a bad thing. We’re trying to end them, not win them.
The nature of the State is to make false promises to bait support from the people it victimizes. They promise to protect you from boogeymen, they promise to solve your economic problems, they promise to carry out the will of your deity. We see this as completely ridiculous, we know it will fail, and we know that most people are stupid enough to swallow it hook line and sinker, so we can’t compete with it in a popular vote.
Libertarians are anarchists, whether they realize it or not. Even the ones who are delusional enough to think that they are going to get elected and restore the bloody republic, are little more than useful idiots who are repeating anarchist propaganda for us through channels normally reserved for government. The goal is not to win your elections, the goal is to turn a large enough minority against the legitimacy of the State as to make its continued function impossible. So there’s absolutely no incentive to work with you in promoting candidates, which is the primary function of your political activity. You’re right when you say “No candidate is good enough” for us, no matter who runs for office we will tear him down because nobody has the right to be our ruler.
https://christophercantwell.com/2014/04/08/top-10-reasons-libertarians-arent-nice/
 
Last edited:
Why try to "moderate" in order to attract racists, bigots, malcontents, and economic losers?

Fuck Trump. Fuck Trump voters. Fuck Republicans. Fuck Conservatives.

We don't want the votes of traitors.

Not quite the way I would have said it...but your post pretty much captures my feelings on this issue.

Thank you.
 
At this point in time, yes, I support Trump because there is no real alternative. You have yet to come up with one.

I did come up with an alternative to supporting Donald Trump. Can't you read?

My alternative is NOT TO SUPPORT DONALD TRUMP!


We had one in Gary Johnson who I voted for and I still believe would be a good oneNot totally. I have an open mind. It's why I now support what Trump's doing. i have an open mind.
As far as my support for the American conservative agenda does this post of mine support that?

Supporting Donald Trump is not having an open mind.

It is having a twisted mind.

At least, that is the way I see it.

I acknowledge your right to see it otherwise.

The posts indicating support for Donald Trump...IS, accidentally or on purpose...supporting the American conservative agenda.

Don't worry Frank. My side has never prevailed nor we ever expect it to.

If you are being real...if you are being honest...

...you are being cosmically naive, Aloysious.

Please include the words, "...in my opinion..." when considering anything I write here.
 
I don't need google, I actually read the article. Of course leftist loons are going to mischaracterize him, just like they do everything else.
Actually, you do need Google if you think the author is a Liberal. Why do you fight the facts?
 
The OP is spot on.
During the primaries I considered Trump to be the #3 worst candidate behind hrc and Cruz. I never considered voting for him.
After the election came the antifas with their violent protests against the first amendment. Then came the investigation over supposed collusion between Trump's campaign and da Russians initiated by the Steele dossier which was initiated by hrc's campaign and now Mueller indicts a company that didn't exist at the time of the campaign.
Now we have CNN with it's daily headlines "news" about a porn star and her 2 bit lawyer who is actually doing a better job investigating nothing than the highly regarded Mueller.
In spite of Trump's negatives, and there are many, he has some real positives - North Korea (yes even the S. Koreans are positive about the latest events), China in trade negotiations, Gorsuch appointment, attempting to enforce existing immigration laws ,repeal of the individual mandate in Obamacare, reigning back on the use of the EPA to circumvent Congress in making illegal laws (see WOTUS) come to the top of my head, not to mention the humming economy. (I admit I don't know enuf about the Iran deal except that we paid a cash ransom to get it and Iran is threatening to expose Euro leaders they bribed to OK it.)
If the election were held today I'd have to vote for Trump. I've talked to several others who never would have voted for him but would today. Don't forget, there are some out there who voted for hrc but now that's she's continually made an ass out of herself since the election I've no doubt there are hrc voters that would vote for Trump today.
and I don't think he'd have any problem winning if the election were held today, especially against his former opponent or against Bernie.
There were so many factual errors in the first paragraph, I simply can't waste a second more on the rest.

And the fact that Annoise agrees, is certification of that.

Collusion was proven/known long before the Steele dossier. But do keep quoting Hannity.
 
Sorry, A...but I am so fucking tired of that bullshit American conservative nonsense that I cannot respond courteously.
It's on Wiki too:

Classical liberalism is a political ideology and a branch of liberalism which advocates civil liberties under the rule of law with an emphasis on economic freedom. Closely related to economic liberalism, it developed in the early 19th century, building on ideas from the previous century as a response to urbanization and to the Industrial Revolution in Europe and the United States.[1][2][3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism

Hmmmm. sounds as if you've been...
th.jpg
 
Then we end up with Pence, who is much more dangerous
so once again Trump was a genius picking him. Dims don't impeach Trump even though he colluded wid da Russians because Pence is worse. Got it.
Either way, since collusion has been proven beyond any doubt what is Mueller investigating? Or does he just investigate until he's dead?
 
Back
Top