Vindman Tried to Alter Call Transcript. Failed

Micawber said:
Gnat tried to turn lemons into lemonade, failed.

We all already know the story about the omissions Vindman noticed from Trump's call he heard that Repukes kept out.
Click to expand...
Can't blame them for trying to obfuscate. As seen here, it works with the 'under educated'.
 
Darth Omar said:
Maybe we’ll get to see how honest he is or isn’t under oath.

Or not. It’s raining academic questions today.
Click to expand...

I do not believe his story will change, he appears to be a man of character, unlike Trump, who wouldn’t testify because his lawyers are afraid he’ll lie.
 
Phantasmal said:
I do not believe his story will change he appears to be a man of character, unlike Trump, who wouldn’t testify because his lawyers are afraid he’ll lie.
Click to expand...

Trump didn’t testify because Mullet lacked the justification for it.

Aka ‘lacking evidence’. If Weismann could have forced Trump to testify he absolutely would have—but he lacked the goods.

I’ve learned to be skeptical of people the News Fakers claim to have character.
 
Phantasmal said:
Lol, yes, he wanted what was omitted placed back in. He also objected to them putting it in the classified server. He objected to what the WH lawyers omitted, imagine that. He wanted the truth.
Click to expand...

Let's see the Col. is a registered Democrat, close to Biden of course his testimony would never be biased in any way.
 
Darth Omar said:
In a courtroom that’s called ‘altering evidence’ and gets thrown out and the individual doing the altering is lucky they don’t get charged with a crime.
Click to expand...

dear fucking idiot

it was NOT court evidence at the time

trumpanzees didn't want to make a true record of the call


Venerman objected to not fully documenting the call and didn't want it burried in a top secret file



No worries

others heard the call too


the True record is being documented now
 
Darth Omar said:
In a courtroom that’s called ‘altering evidence’ and gets thrown out and the individual doing the altering is lucky they don’t get charged with a crime.
Click to expand...

You're absolutely wrong. In a court the transcript that was released would be suspect because witnesses may testify that it did not contain all that was said. Another way to look at it: Two parties in court are arguing about a contract breach. One party produces a copy of the contract but a page is missing, and that page possibly changes the outcome of the contract breach complaint. If the other party can show that a page is missing, how do you think the judge will rule? Okay to go ahead with the partial contract, or with the entire document?

You guys need some better arguments.
 
This is the same thing the republican party did to John Kerry


a hero with many medals of bravery and honorable service


The republican party has hated military service for a long time folks
 
anatta said:
“I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained. This would all undermine U.S. national security. Following the call, I again reported my concerns to NSC’s lead counsel.” Lt Lt Col Vindman

~~

so we are not supposed to ask Zelensky to investigate because it might put aid at risk? WTF?

Vindmen has also been advising Ukraine on dealing around Guliani w/State instead.
WTF?
Does he work in the NSC or the USA -or for Ukraine?
More NSC moles left over from Obama
Click to expand...

The greatest threat to our Republic are non-elected leftist bureaucrats who believe they should be making our foreign policy and not the President.

:smh:
 
Eagle-Eye said:
Let's see the Col. is a registered Democrat, close to Biden of course his testimony would never be biased in any way.
Click to expand...

And you know this how? So you don't think that a fellow veteran could be honorable or honest unless he votes (R)? And isn't this exactly the same thing said about the unknown whistleblower?

AuKr3KX.jpg
 
anatta said:
“I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained. This would all undermine U.S. national security. Following the call, I again reported my concerns to NSC’s lead counsel.” Lt Lt Col Vindman

~~

so we are not supposed to ask Zelensky to investigate because it might put aid at risk? WTF?

Vindmen has also been advising Ukraine on dealing around Guliani w/State instead.
WTF?
Does he work in the NSC or the USA -or for Ukraine?


More NSC moles left over from Obama
Click to expand...

It sounds like he works for the Ukraine. Fire the asshole and shut off his retirement pay for being a foreign spy and traitor to the USA.
 
Darth Omar said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1189966947397574656

This thing is starting to stink.

If it’s true the WB was Biden’s point man in Ukraine, republicans need to demand that the WB testify under oath—or just call the whole thing off. If Democrats don’t want to do that, then send articles of impeachment over to the senate so they won’t have to go around Schiff to get to the bottom of this.
Click to expand...
starting to stink?? :rolleyes:

Yes this WB is a Democratic operative - who colluded with the Schiff staff
 
Gonzomin said:
Zelensky is a foreign leader so that is a big NO. Also, we have 16 agencies whose function is to investigate crimes here and abroad.
Threatening or using mil;military aid as a cudgel to get Zelensky is against principles and laws.
Click to expand...

That's a massive pile of BULL SHIT Gonzo. You seem to love wallowing in it like a pig in heat. :rolleyes:
 
Gonzomin said:
Zelensky is a foreign leader so that is a big NO. Also, we have 16 agencies whose function is to investigate crimes here and abroad.
Threatening or using mil;military aid as a cudgel to get Zelensky is against principles and laws.
Click to expand...
areyou clueless about everything? asking Zelensky for a favor to investigate corruption is perfectly fine
 
anatta said:
Yesterday, Lt Col Alexander Vindman, a member of the National Security Council, testified in Adam Schiff’s kangaroo court in the basement of the Capitol Building…the coup continues.
Several things became readily apparent:
1) NSC members are not supposed to wear their uniforms (the theatrical presence), and
2) Adam Schiff shut down ANY Republican questions, only allowing Democrats to question the witness, 3) Vindman admitted attempting to alter the President’s transcript of the Ukraine call but was unsuccessful in two cases,
4) Vindman admitted attempting to share the President’s classified call to other operatives.

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

Vindman claimed that there were at least two omissions in the White House transcript, so he set about to alter it to put the omissions back.
But the left wing NYT said that even with the phrases gone, the understanding of the transcript wasn’t changed.
But of course, the left is seizing on the transcript not being “exact” and shrieking that it was not a true transcript.

Vindman believes that if the Ukraine pursued the investigation of Hunter Biden, they would lose bipartisan support. So the coup continues again.


We have undue influence or crimes possibly committed by an American connected to a high government official that may have caused serious national security issues and he didn’t want the US or the Ukraine to investigate it. What are his connections to Biden and the Democrats?

We have the possibility that this Lt Col violated US code 18 USC 798 in sharing a classified call with others.
~~

When Rep Jordan attempted to ask Vindman who he shared the information with, Adam Schiff shut down the question.

Vindman’s testimony causes serious problems for the President, even though it is fraught with the admission of leaking, altering a document, etc. If arrogance was against the US Code, we could probably prosecute Vindman for that.
Click to expand...

You Trumperoos are such fibbers.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
You're absolutely wrong. In a court the transcript that was released would be suspect because witnesses may testify that it did not contain all that was said. Another way to look at it: Two parties in court are arguing about a contract breach. One party produces a copy of the contract but a page is missing, and that page possibly changes the outcome of the contract breach complaint. If the other party can show that a page is missing, how do you think the judge will rule? Okay to go ahead with the partial contract, or with the entire document?

You guys need some better arguments.
Click to expand...
transcript is not a legal document.. it is a composite. Vindman did get 2 entries altered
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top