NY Times caught blatantly lying about Russia targeting U.S. Soldiers

Darth Omar said:
It’s ‘invented’ in the sense that Trump was briefed on it.

That appears to be ‘something perhaps not accurate’ at this point. But, that’s what we come to expect from the media these days.
Click to expand...

200.webp
 
PostmodernProphet said:
the Mueller investigation......didn't you pay attention?....
Click to expand...

PostmodernProphet said:
lol....and there was a noose in Wallace's garage........and the Russians helped Trump get elected.......you realize how bad your track record is, right?.....
Click to expand...

FreeSpeech said:
Where is the statement from US intelligence agencies you lying fuck? Was it from the same authors of the NIE that claimed Russia hacked the DNC despite the head of Crowdstrike who conducted the forensic analysis of the DNC servers personally now claiming under oath that there is no real evidence to prove that claim?
Click to expand...

200.webp
 
Nordberg said:
The soldiers were aware something was not right long ago. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...ian-bounties-on-us-troops/ar-BB164Uci?ocid=sf They gathered evidence which of course just evaporates if Trump says not true.
Click to expand...

Your own article claims the UNCONFIRMED SUSPICIONS were reported up from forces on the ground in January, while the review of troops who might have died as a result turned up nothing because there was a ceasefire and the Taliban stopped killing ANYONE in February. So, where is the scandal you're so desperate to convince people exists here?

:awesome:
 
Arminius said:


Again, from the people who spent four years telling us President Trump would be proven to be a secret Russian agent. And that Hillary had a 92% chance of winning. And that repealing "Net Neutrality" would destroy the Internet. And their 40+ humiliated global warming doomsday predictions, etc.

:awesome:
Click to expand...

Patience, you will be proven to be the same dumb cunt you always have been
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
You think the Mueller investigation established that there was no Russian interference in the 2016 election?
Click to expand...

This is the standard demagogue deflection. Misrepresent anyone noting that the Mueller investigation debunked the left's 4-year lying spree over an obviously ludicrous conspiracy theory...as them saying Russia didn't make some Facebook posts to help Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. Totally dishonest horseshit spin and you know it.

Tranquillus in Exile said:
I guess I wan't paying attention! Either that, or you have learned from Trump to confuse your wishes with reality.
Click to expand...

That's literally what ONLY YOU are doing...and JUST GOT DONE doing. :rofl2:

 
First they denied it.

Then, they said they were never briefed about it.

Now, they're saying it wasn't solid intel.

They've changed their story twice in the last 72 hours.
 
floridafan said:
Every single person in this administration outright LIES. Its interesting that supposedly the president was not "briefed" yet our allies were. This story has legs is going to continue and grow over the coming weeks and months. Just what your kind wants in an election season.
Click to expand...

Or he's literally already been proven to be the most plotted against president in history. And it always turns out to be fake. :laugh:
 
LV426 said:
First they denied it.

Then, they said they were never briefed about it.

Now, they're saying it wasn't solid intel.

They've changed their story twice in the last 72 hours.
Click to expand...
Typical, as more info comes out proving they lie all the time.
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
You can, apparently, over and over.

Even the conservative Daily Telegraph comments on it as established fact. From an editorial comment today:

> It now transpires that the Russian secret service bribed Taliban commanders to break this pact [the Doha agreement]. A GRU intelligence unit behind the attempted murder in Salisbury of Sergei Skripal offered a bounty to fighters to kill British and American soldiers.

Although Mr Trump says he was not aware of this, security sources on both sides of the Atlantic have confirmed it. The Russians deny it, accusing the New York Times of "fake news". <


And so do the Trump suckers, lol. Can you say useful idiots?
Click to expand...

ALL sides deny it, including the Taliban. And we've seen British intelligence participate in hoaxes against President Trump before...a British spy is how we got the fake dossier. Fiona Hill lied under oath about it being "fiction" that Ukraine tried to influence U.S. elections (a provable fact), etc. Literally everyone you're listening to has a track record of getting caught lying to hurt this president and is being contradicted by the facts and all involved.

:bs:
 
Darth Omar said:
Pretty much.

Especially if was raw intelligence. It could have been Russian misinformation for all they knew. And there’s the argument about priorities: analysts have to prioritize what they bring to the briefings since they only have X amount of time before the president has to move onto something else.

Nothing Burger.
Click to expand...

So when was your tenure with NSC? LOL at you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top